Showing 26 of 32 total issues
Method selector_option has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def selector_option(label, param, value, default=false, class_name=nil)
class_name = value unless class_name
selected = params[param] == value.to_s || (params[param].nil? && default)
"<a href=\"?#{param}=#{value}\" class=\"option #{class_name}#{' selected' if selected}\" data-selector-param=\"#{param}\" data-selector-value=\"#{value}\" #{'data-selector-default="true"' if default}>#{label}</a>".html_safe
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method map_options has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def map_options(obj)
obj_type = object_type obj
geojsonTileURL = obj_type == :map ? "/maps/#{obj.id}/tile/{z}/{x}/{y}" : "/geo_data/tile/{z}/{x}/{y}"
opts = {
layers: obj.try(:layers_values),- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method cleaned_relations_attributes has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cleaned_relations_attributes(_params)
_attrs = JSON.parse _params[:relations_attributes]
_attrs.map do |r|
OpenStruct.new(
id: (r['id'].blank? ? nil : r['id'].to_i ),- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method save_object has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def save_object(obj, params_hash)
obj.assign_attributes(params_hash)
changes = obj.changes
if obj.valid? && obj.save
obj_name = obj.class.name.underscore- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method featured= has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def featured=(value)
if value == true
Featured.find_or_create_by(_featured_params)
elsif value == false
featured = Featured.where(_featured_params).first- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method serialized_as has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.serialized_as(format, ids=nil)
collection = (ids ? where(id: ids) : all).map { |obj| active_model_serializer.new(obj) }
hashs_collection = collection.map &:serializable_hash
case format
when :json then hashs_collection.to_json- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"