jaredhanson/oauth2orize

View on GitHub
lib/exchange/password.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

Function exports has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module.exports = function(options, issue) {
  if (typeof options == 'function') {
    issue = options;
    options = undefined;
  }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/exchange/password.js - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function exports has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module.exports = function(options, issue) {
  if (typeof options == 'function') {
    issue = options;
    options = undefined;
  }
Severity: Major
Found in lib/exchange/password.js - About 2 hrs to fix

    Function password has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      return function password(req, res, next) {
        if (!req.body) { return next(new Error('OAuth2orize requires body parsing. Did you forget app.use(express.bodyParser())?')); }
        
        // The 'user' property of `req` holds the authenticated user.  In the case
        // of the token endpoint, the property will contain the OAuth 2.0 client.
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/exchange/password.js - About 2 hrs to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

            return next(ex);
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/exchange/password.js - About 30 mins to fix

        Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            function issued(err, accessToken, refreshToken, params) {
              if (err) { return next(err); }
              if (!accessToken) { return next(new TokenError('Invalid resource owner credentials', 'invalid_grant')); }
              if (refreshToken && typeof refreshToken == 'object') {
                params = refreshToken;
        Severity: Major
        Found in lib/exchange/password.js and 3 other locations - About 1 day to fix
        lib/exchange/authorizationCode.js on lines 80..99
        lib/exchange/clientCredentials.js on lines 103..122
        lib/exchange/refreshToken.js on lines 104..123

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 215.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            if (scope) {
              if (typeof scope !== 'string') {
                return next(new TokenError('Invalid parameter: scope must be a string', 'invalid_request'));
              }
        
        
        Severity: Major
        Found in lib/exchange/password.js and 2 other locations - About 5 hrs to fix
        lib/exchange/clientCredentials.js on lines 86..101
        lib/exchange/refreshToken.js on lines 87..102

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 138.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status