Showing 303 of 498 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((pr = p.right) != null && h >= pr.hash && (r = getTreeNode(h, k, pr)) != null)
return r;
else // continue descending down the left subtree
dir = -1;Method writeObject has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream s)
throws java.io.IOException {
if (segments == null) { // for serialization compatibility
segments = (Segment<K,V>[])
new Segment<?,?>[DEFAULT_CONCURRENCY_LEVEL];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((e.val = v) == null) {
deleted = true;
Node en = e.next;
if (pred != null)
pred.next = en;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (Node e = tabAt(tab, i); e != null; e = e.next) {
if (++c > TREE_THRESHOLD &&
(e.key instanceof Comparable)) {
replaceWithTreeBin(tab, i, e.key);
break;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!collide && q != null && q.hash == p.hash)
collide = true;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (count >= TREE_THRESHOLD)
replaceWithTreeBin(tab, i, k);Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((p.val = v) == null) {
deleted = true;
t.deleteTreeNode(p);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((p.val = v) == null) {
deleted = true;
t.deleteTreeNode(p);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (busy == 0 && casBusy()) {
boolean created = false;
try { // Recheck under lock
Cell[] rs; int m, j;
if ((rs = cells) != null &&Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (count >= TREE_THRESHOLD)
replaceWithTreeBin(tab, i, k);Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((pr = p.right) != null && h >= pr.hash && (r = getTreeNode(h, k, pr)) != null)
return r;
// try to continue iterating on the left side
else if ((pl = p.left) != null && h <= pl.hash)
dir = -1;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((e.val = v) == null) {
deleted = true;
Node en = e.next;
if (pred != null)
pred.next = en;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (Node e = tabAt(tab, i); e != null; e = e.next) {
if (++c > TREE_THRESHOLD &&
(e.key instanceof Comparable)) {
replaceWithTreeBin(tab, i, e.key);
break;Method writeObject has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream s)
throws java.io.IOException {
if (segments == null) { // for serialization compatibility
segments = (Segment<K,V>[])
new Segment<?,?>[DEFAULT_CONCURRENCY_LEVEL];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((pr = p.right) != null && h >= pr.hash && (r = getTreeNode(h, k, pr)) != null)
return r;
else // continue descending down the left subtree
dir = -1;Method para_prepare has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def para_prepare(&block)
num_threads = $conf[:num_threads]
count = $conf[:count_per_thread]
if num_threads % 2 > 0- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (count >= TREE_THRESHOLD)
replaceWithTreeBin(tab, i, k);Method ns_wait_until has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ns_wait_until(timeout = nil, &condition)
if timeout
wait_until = Concurrent.monotonic_time + timeout
loop do
now = Concurrent.monotonic_time- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_envelope has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_envelope(envelope)
command, reason = envelope.message
case command
when :terminated?
terminated?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method consume_signal has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def consume_signal(message)
if AbstractSignal === message
case message
when Ask
@reply = message.probe- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"