Sign upLogin

jirutka/corefines

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 9 of 9 total issues

Method rekey has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def rekey(key_map = nil, &block)
          fail ArgumentError, "provide key_map, or block, not both" if key_map && block

          # Note: self.dup is used to preserve the default_proc.
          if key_map
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/hash.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method to_re has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def to_re(opts = {})

          if opts[:literal]
            content = ::Regexp.escape(self)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/string.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method camelcase has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def camelcase(*separators)
          first_letter = separators.shift if ::Symbol === separators.first
          separators = [/_+/, /\s+/] if separators.empty?

          self.dup.tap do |str|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/string.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method deep_dup has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def deep_dup(obj = self)
          return obj.deep_dup if obj != self && obj.respond_to?(:deep_dup)

          case obj
          when ::NilClass, ::FalseClass, ::TrueClass, ::Symbol, ::Numeric, ::Method
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/object.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method then_if has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def then_if(*conditions)
          return self if conditions.empty? && !self
          return self unless conditions.all? do |arg|
            case arg
            when ::Symbol then public_send(arg)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/object.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method define_refine has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.define_refine(target)
        target.send(:define_method, :refine) do |klass, &block|
          fail TypeError, "wrong argument type #{klass.class} (expected Class)" unless klass.is_a? ::Class
          fail ArgumentError, "no block given" unless block
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/support/fake_refinements.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method many? has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def many?
            cnt = 0
            if block_given?
              any? do |element|
                cnt += 1 if yield element
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/enumerable.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method force_utf8! has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def force_utf8!
          str = force_encoding(Encoding::UTF_8)

          if str.respond_to? :scrub!
            str.scrub!
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/string.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method color has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def color(opts)
          opts = {text: opts} unless opts.is_a? ::Hash
          opts[:fg] ||= opts[:text] || opts[:color]
          opts[:bg] ||= opts[:background]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/corefines/string.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language