File earley-boyer.js has 3397 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// This file is automatically generated by scheme2js, except for the
// benchmark harness code at the beginning and end of the file.
var EarleyBoyer = new BenchmarkSuite('EarleyBoyer', 666463, [
new Benchmark("Earley", function () { BgL_earleyzd2benchmarkzd2(); }),Function nextToken has a Cognitive Complexity of 102 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Tokenizer.prototype.nextToken = function() {
var port = this.port;
function isNumberChar(c) {
return (c >= "0" && c <= "9");- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function nextToken has 168 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Tokenizer.prototype.nextToken = function() {
var port = this.port;
function isNumberChar(c) {
return (c >= "0" && c <= "9");Function read has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Reader.prototype.read = function() {
function readList(listBeginType) {
function matchesPeer(open, close) {
return open === 1/*OPEN_PAR*/ && close === 2/*CLOSE_PAR*/
|| open === 3/*OPEN_BRACE*/ && close === 4/*CLOSE_BRACE*/- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_format has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_format(s, args) {
var len = s.length;
var p = new sc_StringOutputPort();
var i = 0, j = 1;
Function read has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Reader.prototype.read = function() {
function readList(listBeginType) {
function matchesPeer(open, close) {
return open === 1/*OPEN_PAR*/ && close === 2/*CLOSE_PAR*/
|| open === 3/*OPEN_BRACE*/ && close === 4/*CLOSE_BRACE*/Function sc_prepWriteCircle has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_prepWriteCircle(o, symb, nbPointer) {
// TODO sc_Struct
if (o instanceof sc_Pair ||
o instanceof sc_Vector) {
if (o[symb] !== undefined) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readString has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function readString() {
res = "";
while (true) {
var c = port.readChar();
switch (c) {Function sc_format has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_format(s, args) {
var len = s.length;
var p = new sc_StringOutputPort();
var i = 0, j = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readSharp has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function readSharp() {
var c = port.readChar();
if (isWhitespace(c))
return new sc_Token(13/*ERROR*/, "bad #-pattern0.");
Function sc_toWriteCircleString has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Pair.prototype.sc_toWriteCircleString = function(symb, inList) {
if (this[symb + "use"]) { // use-flag is set. Just use it.
var nb = this[symb + "nb"];
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_jsstring2number has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_jsstring2number(s, radix) {
if (s === "") return false;
if (radix) {
var t = parseInt(s, radix);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_toWriteCircleString has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Pair.prototype.sc_toWriteCircleString = function(symb, inList) {
if (this[symb + "use"]) { // use-flag is set. Just use it.
var nb = this[symb + "nb"];
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];Function sc_escapeWriteString has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_escapeWriteString(s) {
var res = "";
var j = 0;
for (i = 0; i < s.length; i++) {
switch (s.charAt(i)) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_escapeWriteString has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_escapeWriteString(s) {
var res = "";
var j = 0;
for (i = 0; i < s.length; i++) {
switch (s.charAt(i)) {Function sc_euclid_gcd has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_euclid_gcd(a, b) {
var temp;
if (a === 0) return b;
if (b === 0) return a;
if (a < 0) {a = -a;};- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_toWriteCircleString has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Vector.prototype.sc_toWriteCircleString = function(symb) {
if (this[symb + "use"]) { // use-flag is set. Just use it.
var nb = this[symb + "nb"];
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];Function sc_isList has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_isList(o) {
var rabbit;
var turtle;
var rabbit = o;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((lst1 === null))
return (lst2 === null);
else
if ((lst2 === null))
return false;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while (true) {
if ((l instanceof sc_Pair))
{
(ender = (l.car));
(ender_set = ((state = (sc_states_129[j])), (state[(ender+(1))])));Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((((conf_set = (sc_state_82[(ender+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(BgL_sc_statezd2num_68zd2+(5))]):false))!== false))
{
(next = (sc_conf_80+(1)));
(next_set = (BgL_sc_confzd2setzd2getza2_44za2(sc_state_82, BgL_sc_statezd2num_68zd2, next)));
(conf_set_union(sc_state_82, next_set, next, BgL_sc_confzd2set_79zd2));Function sc_vectorCopyBang has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_vectorCopyBang(target, tstart, source, sstart, send) {
if (!sstart) sstart = 0;
if (!send) send = source.length;
// if target == source we don't want to overwrite not yet copied elements.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (hexC >= '0' && hexC <= '9') {
port.readChar();
nb = nb * 16 + hexC.charCodeAt(0) - '0'.charCodeAt(0);
} else if (hexC >= 'a' && hexC <= 'f') {
port.readChar();Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while ((i>=(0))) {
{
(pred_set = ((sc_state_83 = (sc_states_78[i])), (sc_state_83[(pred+(1))])));
if ((pred_set!== false))
{Function sc_toWriteCircleString has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Vector.prototype.sc_toWriteCircleString = function(symb) {
if (this[symb + "use"]) { // use-flag is set. Just use it.
var nb = this[symb + "nb"];
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (((k>=i)&&(((state = (sc_states_114[k])), (conf_set = (state[(prev+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(i+(5))]):false))!== false)))
{
(nb_prev_trees = (nb_deriv_trees(prev, i, k, sc_enders_111, sc_steps_112, sc_toks_113, sc_states_114, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_115zd2)));
(nb_ender_trees = (nb_deriv_trees(ender, k, j, sc_enders_111, sc_steps_112, sc_toks_113, sc_states_114, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_115zd2)));
(k = (ender_set[(k+(5))]));Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (((starter_set[(BgL_sc_statezd2num_68zd2+(5))])=== false))
{
(conf_set_adjoin(sc_state_82, starter_set, starter, BgL_sc_statezd2num_68zd2));
(sc_l_74 = (sc_l_74.cdr));
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((k>=(0)))
if (((k>=i)&&(((sc_state_99 = (sc_states_96[k])), (conf_set = (sc_state_99[(prev+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(i+(5))]):false))!== false)))
{
(prev_trees = (deriv_trees(prev, i, k, sc_enders_92, sc_steps_93, sc_names_94, sc_toks_95, sc_states_96, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_97zd2)));
(ender_trees = (deriv_trees(ender, k, j, sc_enders_92, sc_steps_93, sc_names_94, sc_toks_95, sc_states_96, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_97zd2)));Function sc_vectorCopyBang has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_vectorCopyBang(target, tstart, source, sstart, send) {Function sc_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_hash(o) {
if (o === null)
return "null";
else if (o === undefined)
return "undefined";- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_filterMap has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_filterMap(proc, l1, l2, l3) {
if (l2 === undefined)
return sc_filterMap1(proc, l1);
else if (l3 === undefined)
return sc_filterMap2(proc, l1, l2);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_remqBang has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_remqBang(o, l) {
var dummy = { cdr : null };
var tail = dummy;
var needsAssig = true;
while (l !== null) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_deleteBang has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_deleteBang(o, l) {
var dummy = { cdr : null };
var tail = dummy;
var needsAssig = true;
while (l !== null) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return "num-" + o;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return (lst2 === null);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return new sc_Token(20/*CHAR*/, entry);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return "jsstr-" + o;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return "#<procedure " + sc_hash(o) + ">";Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return (sc_isEqual(x, y));Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return b;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return new sc_Token(13/*ERROR*/, "bad #-pattern5");Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return "#<procedure " + sc_hash(o) + ">";Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return o.toString();Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return res;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (+c === 0 && c !== "0") return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return o.sc_toWriteString();Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return o.sc_getHash();Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return sc_counterHash.call(o);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return new sc_Token(13/*ERROR*/, "unknown character description: #\\" + tmp);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return new sc_Token(13/*ERROR*/, "bad #-pattern4 " + c + " " + needing);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return o.sc_toDisplayString();Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return o.toString();Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (!t && t !== 0) return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return t;Function sc_pregexpMatch has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_pregexpMatch(re, s) {
var reg = (re instanceof RegExp) ? re : sc_pregexp(re);
var tmp = reg.exec(sc_string2jsstring(s));
if (tmp == null) return false;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_toWriteString has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_toWriteString(o) {
if (o === null)
return "()";
else if (o === true)
return "#t";- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sc_toDisplayString has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_toDisplayString(o) {
if (o === null)
return "()";
else if (o === true)
return "#t";- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (((term1.car)===(term2.car)))
{
(lst1 = (term1.cdr));
(lst2 = (term2.cdr));
while (true) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 111.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((((r1 = (x.car)), (r2 = (y.car)), (r1===r2))!== false))
{
(lst1 = (x.cdr));
(lst2 = (y.cdr));
while (true) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 111.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_toDisplayString(o) {
if (o === null)
return "()";
else if (o === true)
return "#t";- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_toWriteString(o) {
if (o === null)
return "()";
else if (o === true)
return "#t";- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(sc_const_3_nboyer = sc_list((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccompile",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cform",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccodegen",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Coptimize",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cform",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ceqp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgreaterp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clesseqp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgreatereqp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cboolean",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ciff",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ceven1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Codd",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csub1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccountps-",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpred",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccountps-loop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpred",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfact-",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfact-loop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse-",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse-loop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdivides",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cassume-true",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cvar",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Calist",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cvar",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Calist",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cassume-false",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cvar",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Calist",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cvar",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Calist",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctautology-checker",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctautologyp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnormalize",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfalsify",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfalsify1",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnormalize",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cprime",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))),null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cprime1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csub1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cq",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cq",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),null)))))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cq",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cq",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),null)))))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cq",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cq",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),null)))))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cd",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ce",null)))))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cd",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ce",null)))))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cd",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ce",null)))))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-tree",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-tree",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-tree",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-tree",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-fringe",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexec",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpds",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cenvrn",null)))))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexec",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexec",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpds",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cenvrn",null)))))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cenvrn",null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmc-flatten",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cflatten",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cintersect",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnth",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ck",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ck",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ck",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cexp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ck",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse-loop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse-loop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccount-list",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csort-lp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccount-list",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccount-list",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cquotient",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-eval",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbig-plus1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-eval",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-eval",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbig-plus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-eval",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-eval",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cquotient",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),null)))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-eval",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-rep",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-eval",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbig-plus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-rep",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cpower-rep",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cbase",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgcd",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgcd",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnth",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnth",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnth",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cw",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cw",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgcd",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgcd",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cvalue",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnormalize",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cvalue",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cflatten",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnlistp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clistp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgopher",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clistp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csamefringe",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cflatten",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cflatten",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgreatest-factor",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgreatest-factor",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgreatest-factor",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes-list",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes-list",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes-list",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cprime-list",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cprime-list",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cprime-list",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cw",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cw",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgreatereqp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cor",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((1),null)))))),(new sc_Pair(sc_list("\u1E9Cand", (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),null)))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),null)))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csub1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csub1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdelete",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",null)))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csort2",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdelete",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdelete",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csort2",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cl",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdsort",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csort2",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx1",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx2",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx3",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx4",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx5",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx6",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx7",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((6),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx7",null)))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((2),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cquotient",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((2),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cquotient",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair((2),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Csigma",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cquotient",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((2),null)))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnot",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))),null)))))),null)))))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-tree",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdelete",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-tree",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmeaning",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus-tree",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cadd1",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnumberp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnth",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clast",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clistp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clast",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clistp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccar",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clast",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null)),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null)),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cassignment",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cassignedp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cassignment",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cassignment",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccar",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgopher",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clistp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccar",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cflatten",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cflatten",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccdr",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cgopher",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clistp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccdr",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cflatten",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ccons",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cquotient",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czerop",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cfix",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",null)))),null)))))))),null)))))), (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cget",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cset",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cval",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmem",null)))))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cif",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ceqp",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ci",null)))))),(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cval",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cget",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cj",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmem",null)))))),null)))))))),null))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while ((sc_l_74 instanceof sc_Pair)) {
{
(starter = (sc_l_74.car));
(starter_set = (BgL_sc_confzd2setzd2getza2_44za2(sc_state_82, BgL_sc_statezd2num_68zd2, starter)));
if (((starter_set[(BgL_sc_statezd2num_68zd2+(5))])=== false))- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while ((l1 instanceof sc_Pair)) {
{
(sc_conf_59 = (l1.car));
(conf_set = (BgL_sc_confzd2setzd2getza2_44za2(state, BgL_sc_statezd2num_58zd2, sc_conf_59)));
if (((conf_set[(i+(5))])=== false))- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ind = function(nt, sc_nts_10) {
var i;
{
(i = ((sc_nts_10.length)-(1)));
while (true) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
sc_ind_43 = function(nt, sc_nts_49) {
var i;
{
(i = ((sc_nts_49.length)-(1)));
while (true) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(sc_const_4_nboyer = (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cand",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cu",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cu",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cw",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cimplies",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cw",null)))))),null)))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < nbApplyArgs; i++) {
applyArgs[i] = arguments[i + 1].car;
arguments[i + 1] = arguments[i + 1].cdr;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < nbApplyArgs; i++) {
applyArgs[i] = arguments[i + 1].car;
arguments[i + 1] = arguments[i + 1].cdr;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < nbApplyArgs; i++) {
applyArgs[i] = arguments[i + 1].car;
arguments[i + 1] = arguments[i + 1].cdr;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < nbApplyArgs; i++) {
applyArgs[i] = arguments[i + 1].car;
arguments[i + 1] = arguments[i + 1].cdr;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_greaterEqual(x, y) {
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
if (x < arguments[i])
return false;
x = arguments[i];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_greater(x, y) {
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
if (x <= arguments[i])
return false;
x = arguments[i];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_lessEqual(x, y) {
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
if (x > arguments[i])
return false;
x = arguments[i];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_readChar(port) {
if (port === undefined) // we assume the port hasn't been given.
port = SC_DEFAULT_IN; // THREAD: shared var...
var t = port.readChar();
return t === SC_EOF_OBJECT? t: new sc_Char(t);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_peekChar(port) {
if (port === undefined) // we assume the port hasn't been given.
port = SC_DEFAULT_IN; // THREAD: shared var...
var t = port.peekChar();
return t === SC_EOF_OBJECT? t: new sc_Char(t);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(const_nboyer = (new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Czero",null)),null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ctimes",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cc",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cd",null)))))),null)))))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cz",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Creverse",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cappend",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cnil",null)),null)))))),null)))),null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cu",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cequal",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cplus",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cdifference",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cx",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cy",null)))))),null)))))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cw",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clessp",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cremainder",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))))),(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cmember",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ca",(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair("\u1E9Clength",(new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cb",null)))),null)))))),null)))))))),null)))))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return ((lst === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((rewrite_nboyer((lst.car))), ((sc_lst_14 = (lst.cdr)), ((sc_lst_14 === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((rewrite_nboyer((sc_lst_14.car))), (rewrite_args_nboyer((sc_lst_14.cdr))))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_multi() {
var product = 1;
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++)
product *= arguments[i];
return product;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_plus() {
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++)
sum += arguments[i];
return sum;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return (!(term instanceof sc_Pair)?term:(new sc_Pair((BgL_sc_symbolzd2ze3symbolzd2record_1ze3_nboyer((term.car))), ((lst = (term.cdr)), ((lst === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((translate_term_nboyer((lst.car))), (translate_args_nboyer((lst.cdr))))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (((k>=i)&&(((sc_state_99 = (sc_states_96[k])), (conf_set = (sc_state_99[(prev+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(i+(5))]):false))!== false)))
{
(prev_trees = (deriv_trees(prev, i, k, sc_enders_92, sc_steps_93, sc_names_94, sc_toks_95, sc_states_96, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_97zd2)));
(ender_trees = (deriv_trees(ender, k, j, sc_enders_92, sc_steps_93, sc_names_94, sc_toks_95, sc_states_96, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_97zd2)));
loop3 = function(l3, l2) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (((k>=i)&&(((state = (sc_states_114[k])), (conf_set = (state[(prev+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(i+(5))]):false))!== false)))
{
(nb_prev_trees = (nb_deriv_trees(prev, i, k, sc_enders_111, sc_steps_112, sc_toks_113, sc_states_114, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_115zd2)));
(nb_ender_trees = (nb_deriv_trees(ender, k, j, sc_enders_111, sc_steps_112, sc_toks_113, sc_states_114, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_115zd2)));
(k = (ender_set[(k+(5))]));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];
delete this[symb + "nb"];
delete this[symb + "use"];
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];
delete this[symb + "nb"];
delete this[symb + "use"];
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];
delete this[symb + "nb"];
delete this[symb + "use"];
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this[symb]-- === 0) { // if we are the last use. remove all fields.
delete this[symb];
delete this[symb + "nb"];
delete this[symb + "use"];
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_assv(o, al) {
while (al !== null) {
if (al.car.car === o)
return al.car;
al = al.cdr;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_assq(o, al) {
while (al !== null) {
if (al.car.car === o)
return al.car;
al = al.cdr;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(true_term_nboyer = ((sc_term_18 = (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Ct",null))), (!(sc_term_18 instanceof sc_Pair)?sc_term_18:(new sc_Pair((BgL_sc_symbolzd2ze3symbolzd2record_1ze3_nboyer((sc_term_18.car))), (translate_args_nboyer((sc_term_18.cdr))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(false_term_nboyer = ((sc_term_19 = (new sc_Pair("\u1E9Cf",null))), (!(sc_term_19 instanceof sc_Pair)?sc_term_19:(new sc_Pair((BgL_sc_symbolzd2ze3symbolzd2record_1ze3_nboyer((sc_term_19.car))), (translate_args_nboyer((sc_term_19.cdr))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (hexC >= 'A' && hexC <= 'F') {
port.readChar();
nb = nb * 16 + hexC.charCodeAt(0) - 'A'.charCodeAt(0);
} else {
// next char isn't part of hex.- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (hexC >= 'a' && hexC <= 'f') {
port.readChar();
nb = nb * 16 + hexC.charCodeAt(0) - 'a'.charCodeAt(0);
} else if (hexC >= 'A' && hexC <= 'F') {
port.readChar();- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (hexC >= '0' && hexC <= '9') {
port.readChar();
nb = nb * 16 + hexC.charCodeAt(0) - '0'.charCodeAt(0);
} else if (hexC >= 'a' && hexC <= 'f') {
port.readChar();- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (arguments.length === 1)
return -x;
else {
var res = x;
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (arguments.length === 1)
return 1/x;
else {
var res = x;
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(sc_term_21 = (apply_subst_nboyer(((const_nboyer === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair((const_nboyer.car.car), (translate_term_nboyer((const_nboyer.car.cdr))))), (translate_alist_nboyer((const_nboyer.cdr)))))), optrOpnd)));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return ((alist === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair((alist.car.car), ((term = (alist.car.cdr)), (!(term instanceof sc_Pair)?term:(new sc_Pair((BgL_sc_symbolzd2ze3symbolzd2record_1ze3_nboyer((term.car))), (translate_args_nboyer((term.cdr))))))))), ((sc_alist_6 = (alist.cdr)), ((sc_alist_6 === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((new sc_Pair((sc_alist_6.car.car), (translate_term_nboyer((sc_alist_6.car.cdr))))), (translate_alist_nboyer((sc_alist_6.cdr))))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((((state = (sc_states_106[j])), (conf_set = (state[(sc_conf_107+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(i+(5))]):false))!== false))
{
(l = (l.cdr));
(trees = (sc_append((deriv_trees(sc_conf_107, i, j, sc_enders_102, sc_steps_103, sc_names_104, sc_toks_105, sc_states_106, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_108zd2)), trees)));
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((((state = (sc_states_123[j])), (conf_set = (state[(sc_conf_124+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(i+(5))]):false))!== false))
{
(l = (l.cdr));
(nb_trees = ((nb_deriv_trees(sc_conf_124, i, j, sc_enders_120, sc_steps_121, sc_toks_122, sc_states_123, BgL_sc_nbzd2nts_125zd2))+nb_trees));
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((((state = (sc_states_88[j])), (conf_set = (state[(sc_conf_89+(1))])), ((conf_set!== false)?(conf_set[(i+(5))]):false))!== false))
return true;
else
(l = (l.cdr));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var sc_tmp = arguments.length - 1; sc_tmp >= 0; sc_tmp--) {
args = sc_cons(arguments[sc_tmp], args);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var sc_tmp = arguments.length - 1; sc_tmp >= 0; sc_tmp--) {
args = sc_cons(arguments[sc_tmp], args);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_Token(type, val, pos) {
this.type = type;
this.val = val;
this.pos = pos;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((((sc_x_8 = (sc_x_11.cdr.car)), (tmp1126 = (is_term_equal_nboyer(sc_x_8, true_term_nboyer))), ((tmp1126!== false)?tmp1126:(is_term_member_nboyer(sc_x_8, true_lst))))!== false))
(sc_x_11 = (sc_x_11.cdr.cdr.car));
else
if ((((x = (sc_x_11.cdr.car)), (tmp1125 = (is_term_equal_nboyer(x, false_term_nboyer))), ((tmp1125!== false)?tmp1125:(is_term_member_nboyer(x, false_lst))))!== false))
(sc_x_11 = (sc_x_11.cdr.cdr.cdr.car));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
sc_InputPort.prototype.readChar = function() {
var tmp = this.peekChar();
delete this.peeked;
return tmp;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
sc_Tokenizer.prototype.readToken = function() {
var tmp = this.peekToken();
delete this.peeked;
return tmp;
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((((x = (sc_x_11.cdr.car)), (tmp1125 = (is_term_equal_nboyer(x, false_term_nboyer))), ((tmp1125!== false)?tmp1125:(is_term_member_nboyer(x, false_lst))))!== false))
(sc_x_11 = (sc_x_11.cdr.cdr.cdr.car));
else
if (((tautologyp_nboyer((sc_x_11.cdr.cdr.car), (new sc_Pair((sc_x_11.cdr.car), true_lst)), false_lst))!== false))
{- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_display(o, p) {
if (p === undefined) // we assume not given
p = SC_DEFAULT_OUT;
p.appendJSString(sc_toDisplayString(o));
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_write(o, p) {
if (p === undefined) // we assume not given
p = SC_DEFAULT_OUT;
p.appendJSString(sc_toWriteString(o));
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_writeCircle(o, p) {
if (p === undefined) // we assume not given
p = SC_DEFAULT_OUT;
p.appendJSString(sc_toWriteCircleString(o));
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return (!(term instanceof sc_Pair)?((temp_temp = (sc_assq(term, alist))), ((temp_temp!== false)?(temp_temp.cdr):term)):(new sc_Pair((term.car), ((lst = (term.cdr)), ((lst === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((apply_subst_nboyer(alist, (lst.car))), (apply_subst_lst_nboyer(alist, (lst.cdr))))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_withInputFromPort(p, thunk) {
try {
var tmp = SC_DEFAULT_IN; // THREAD: shared var.
SC_DEFAULT_IN = p;
return thunk();- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return ((lst === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((apply_subst_nboyer(alist, (lst.car))), ((sc_lst_7 = (lst.cdr)), ((sc_lst_7 === null)?null:(new sc_Pair((apply_subst_nboyer(alist, (sc_lst_7.car))), (apply_subst_lst_nboyer(alist, (sc_lst_7.cdr))))))))));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function sc_withOutputToPort(p, thunk) {
try {
var tmp = SC_DEFAULT_OUT; // THREAD: shared var.
SC_DEFAULT_OUT = p;
return thunk();- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76