File json.js
has 382 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Copyright Joyent, Inc. and other Node contributors.
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
// copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
// "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
Function doJSON
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doJSON(input, filename, cb) {
var root = {source: filename};
var stack = [root];
var depth = 0;
var current = root;
Function finishSection
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function finishSection(section, parent) {
if (!section || !parent) {
throw new Error('Invalid finishSection call\n'+
JSON.stringify(section) + '\n' +
JSON.stringify(parent));
Function processList
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processList(section) {
var list = section.list;
var values = [];
var current;
var stack = [];
Function finishSection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function finishSection(section, parent) {
if (!section || !parent) {
throw new Error('Invalid finishSection call\n'+
JSON.stringify(section) + '\n' +
JSON.stringify(parent));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseListItem
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseListItem(item) {
if (item.options) item.options.forEach(parseListItem);
if (!item.textRaw) return;
// the goal here is to find the name, type, default, and optional.
Function parseSignature
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseSignature(text, sig) {
var params = text.match(paramExpr);
if (!params) return;
params = params[1];
// the [ is irrelevant. ] indicates optionalness.
Function parseListItem
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseListItem(item) {
if (item.options) item.options.forEach(parseListItem);
if (!item.textRaw) return;
// the goal here is to find the name, type, default, and optional.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function newSection
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function newSection(tok) {
var section = {};
// infer the type from the text.
var text = section.textRaw = tok.text;
if (text.match(eventExpr)) {
Function newSection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function newSection(tok) {
var section = {};
// infer the type from the text.
var text = section.textRaw = tok.text;
if (text.match(eventExpr)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processList
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processList(section) {
var list = section.list;
var values = [];
var current;
var stack = [];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (eq !== -1) {
def = p.substr(eq + 1);
p = p.substr(0, eq);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76