Showing 71 of 84 total issues
File haml_parser.rb
has 626 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'ripper'
require 'strscan'
module Hamlit
class HamlParser
Class HamlParser
has 49 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HamlParser
include Hamlit::HamlUtil
attr_reader :root
Method tag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tag(line)
tag_name, attributes, attributes_hashes, object_ref, nuke_outer_whitespace,
nuke_inner_whitespace, action, value, last_line = parse_tag(line.text)
preserve_tag = @options.preserve.include?(tag_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(template)
match = template.rstrip.scan(/(([ \t]+)?(.*?))(?:\Z|\r\n|\r|\n)/m)
# discard the last match which is always blank
match.pop
@template = match.each_with_index.map do |(full, whitespace, text), index|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_tag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_tag(text)
match = text.scan(/%([-:\w]+)([-:\w.#\@]*)(.+)?/)[0]
raise HamlSyntaxError.new(HamlError.message(:invalid_tag, text)) unless match
tag_name, attributes, rest = match
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_line
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_line(line)
case line.text[0]
when DIV_CLASS; push div(line)
when DIV_ID
return push plain(line) if %w[{ @ $].include?(line.text[1])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_attributes(is_html, attr_wrapper, escape_attrs, hyphenate_data_attrs, attributes = {})
# @TODO this is an absolutely ridiculous amount of arguments. At least
# some of this needs to be moved into an instance method.
join_char = hyphenate_data_attrs ? '-' : '_'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method haml_tag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def haml_tag(name, *rest, &block)
ret = ErrorReturn.new("haml_tag")
text = rest.shift.to_s unless [Symbol, Hash, NilClass].any? {|t| rest.first.is_a? t}
flags = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_new_attribute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_new_attribute(scanner)
unless (name = scanner.scan(/[-:\w]+/))
return if scanner.scan(/\)/)
return false
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method merge_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_value(key, to, from)
if from.kind_of?(Hash) || to.kind_of?(Hash)
from = { nil => from } if !from.is_a?(Hash)
to = { nil => to } if !to.is_a?(Hash)
to.merge(from)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tag
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tag(line)
tag_name, attributes, attributes_hashes, object_ref, nuke_outer_whitespace,
nuke_inner_whitespace, action, value, last_line = parse_tag(line.text)
preserve_tag = @options.preserve.include?(tag_name)
Method haml_tag
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def haml_tag(name, *rest, &block)
ret = ErrorReturn.new("haml_tag")
text = rest.shift.to_s unless [Symbol, Hash, NilClass].any? {|t| rest.first.is_a? t}
flags = []
Method parse_new_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_new_attributes(text)
scanner = StringScanner.new(text)
last_line = @line.index + 1
attributes = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_static_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_static_hash(text)
attributes = {}
return attributes if text.empty?
text = text[1...-1] # strip brackets
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method flatten_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def flatten_attributes(attributes)
flattened = {}
attributes.each do |key, value|
case value
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method unescape_interpolation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unescape_interpolation(str, escape_html = nil)
res = ''.dup
rest = Hamlit::HamlUtil.handle_interpolation str.dump do |scan|
escapes = (scan[2].size - 1) / 2
char = scan[3] # '{', '@' or '$'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_tag
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_tag(text)
match = text.scan(/%([-:\w]+)([-:\w.#\@]*)(.+)?/)[0]
raise HamlSyntaxError.new(HamlError.message(:invalid_tag, text)) unless match
tag_name, attributes, rest = match
Method call
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(template)
match = template.rstrip.scan(/(([ \t]+)?(.*?))(?:\Z|\r\n|\r|\n)/m)
# discard the last match which is always blank
match.pop
@template = match.each_with_index.map do |(full, whitespace, text), index|
Method silent_script
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def silent_script(line)
raise HamlSyntaxError.new(HamlError.message(:no_end), line.index) if line.text[1..-1].strip == 'end'
line = handle_ruby_multiline(line)
keyword = block_keyword(line.text)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method filter_and_join
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filter_and_join(value, separator)
return '' if (value.respond_to?(:empty?) && value.empty?)
if value.is_a?(Array)
value = value.flatten
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"