Showing 156 of 405 total issues
Function clone
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clone(self, new_author, test_plans):
values = self.__dict__.copy()
del values["_state"]
del values["id"]
if "sortkey" in values:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_execution
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_execution( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments
self,
case,
assignee=None,
build=None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function property_matrix
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def property_matrix(properties, _type="full"):
"""
Return a sequence of tuples representing the property matrix!
"""
property_groups = OrderedDict()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function applyStyleToCell
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function applyStyleToCell (cell) {
const cellElement = cell[1]
if (cellElement) {
const cellChildren = cellElement.children
if (cellChildren) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ajax
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function (data, callback, settings) {
const query = {}
const productIds = $('#id_product').val()
if (productIds.length) {
Function ajax
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function (data, callback, settings) {
const params = {}
if ($('#id_summary').val()) {
params.summary__icontains = $('#id_summary').val()
Function preProcessData
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function preProcessData (data, callbackF) {
const runIds = []
const productIds = []
data.forEach(function (element) {
runIds.push(element.id)
Function pageBugsMutableReadyHandler
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function pageBugsMutableReadyHandler () {
$('#add_id_product').click(function () {
return showRelatedObjectPopup(this)
})
Function ajax
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function (data, callbackF, settings) {
const params = {}
if ($('#id_name').val()) {
params.name__icontains = $('#id_name').val()
Function filterTestExecutionsByProperty
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function filterTestExecutionsByProperty (runId, executions, filterBy, filterValue) {
// no input => show all rows
if (filterValue.trim().length === 0) {
$('.test-execution-element').show()
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drawTable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function drawTable () {
$('.js-spinner').show()
if (table) {
table.destroy()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_permissions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_permissions(
app_config,
verbosity=2,
interactive=True,
using=DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse_translation_string
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_translation_string(self, filename, lines):
startline = 0
startcol = 0
blocktrans_string = ""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function visit_call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def visit_call(self, node):
if node.func.as_string().endswith("Field") and node.keywords:
for keyword in node.keywords:
if keyword.arg == "label":
self.add_message("form-field-label-used", node=node)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function filterTestExecutionsByProperty
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function filterTestExecutionsByProperty (runId, executions, filterBy, filterValue) {
// no input => show all rows
if (filterValue.trim().length === 0) {
$('.test-execution-element').show()
return
Function advancedSearchAndAddTestCases
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function advancedSearchAndAddTestCases (objId, rpcMethod, href, errorMessage) {
window.addTestCases = function (testCaseIDs, sender) {
let rpcErrors = 0
// close the popup
Function renderTestExecutionRow
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function renderTestExecutionRow (testExecution) {
// refresh the internal data structure b/c some fields are used
// to render the expand area and may have changed via bulk-update meanwhile
testExecution.status__name = $('#test_run_pk').data(`trans-execution-status-${testExecution.status}`)
allExecutions[testExecution.id] = testExecution
Function jsonRPC
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function jsonRPC (rpcMethod, rpcParams, callback, isSync) {
// .filter() args are passed as dictionary but other args,
// e.g. for .add_tag() are passed as a list of positional values
if (!Array.isArray(rpcParams)) {
rpcParams = [rpcParams]
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$('#btn-search-cases').click(function () {
return advancedSearchAndAddTestCases(
testRunId, 'TestRun.add_case', $(this).attr('href'),
$('#test_run_pk').data('trans-error-adding-cases')
)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$('#btn-search-cases').click(function () {
return advancedSearchAndAddTestCases(
testPlanId, 'TestPlan.add_case', $(this).attr('href'),
$('#test_plan_pk').data('trans-error-adding-cases')
)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76