Showing 345 of 363 total issues
Function embedding_model_fitting
has 30 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def embedding_model_fitting(
Function deep_unsupervised_embedding
has 28 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deep_unsupervised_embedding(
Function query
has 87 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
query: (query) => {
const filenames = Search._index.filenames;
const docNames = Search._index.docnames;
const titles = Search._index.titles;
const allTitles = Search._index.alltitles;
Function get_graph_dataset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_graph_dataset(
self,
animal_id: str = None,
precomputed_tab_dict: table_dict = None,
center: str = False,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function rupture_per_experiment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rupture_per_experiment(
table_dict: table_dict,
to_rupture: np.ndarray,
rupture_indices: list,
automatic_changepoints: str,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function CHILD
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, _argument, first, last ) {
var simple = type.slice( 0, 3 ) !== "nth",
forward = type.slice( -4 ) !== "last",
ofType = what === "of-type";
Function Sizzle
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Sizzle( selector, context, results, seed ) {
var m, i, elem, nid, match, groups, newSelector,
newContext = context && context.ownerDocument,
// nodeType defaults to 9, since context defaults to document
Function send
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
var i,
xhr = options.xhr();
xhr.open(
Function plot_embeddings
has 24 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plot_embeddings(
Function add
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
var handleObjIn, eventHandle, tmp,
events, t, handleObj,
special, handlers, type, namespaces, origType,
Function matcherFromGroupMatchers
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherFromGroupMatchers( elementMatchers, setMatchers ) {
var bySet = setMatchers.length > 0,
byElement = elementMatchers.length > 0,
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, outermost ) {
var elem, j, matcher,
Function performTermsSearch
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
performTermsSearch: (searchTerms, excludedTerms) => {
// prepare search
const terms = Search._index.terms;
const titleTerms = Search._index.titleterms;
const filenames = Search._index.filenames;
Function done
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done( status, nativeStatusText, responses, headers ) {
var isSuccess, success, error, response, modified,
statusText = nativeStatusText;
// Ignore repeat invocations
Function setMatcher
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setMatcher( preFilter, selector, matcher, postFilter, postFinder, postSelector ) {
if ( postFilter && !postFilter[ expando ] ) {
postFilter = setMatcher( postFilter );
}
if ( postFinder && !postFinder[ expando ] ) {
Function resolve
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function resolve( depth, deferred, handler, special ) {
return function() {
var that = this,
args = arguments,
mightThrow = function() {
Function annotate_video
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def annotate_video(
coordinates: coordinates,
tag_dict: pd.DataFrame,
vid_index: int,
frame_limit: int = np.inf,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has 22 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(
Function heatmap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def heatmap(
dframe: pd.DataFrame,
bodyparts: List,
xlim: tuple = None,
ylim: tuple = None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( forward && useCache ) {
// Seek `elem` from a previously-cached index
// ...in a gzip-friendly way
Function deepEq
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function deepEq(a, b, aStack, bStack) {
// Unwrap any wrapped objects.
if (a instanceof _$1) a = a._wrapped;
if (b instanceof _$1) b = b._wrapped;
// Compare `[[Class]]` names.