File storage.js
has 278 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* services/storage.js
*/
const Promise = require('bluebird');
Function listEventSubs
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
listEventSubs(filters) {
let startTime = filters.startTime ? moment.utc(filters.startTime) : moment.utc();
let endTime = filters.endTime ? moment.utc(filters.endTime) : moment.utc().add(1, 'years');
startTime = startTime.toISOString();
Function getEvents
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getEvents(filter) {
const { owner, tags, hosts } = filter;
const knex = this.client;
const startTime = new Date(filter.startTime).toISOString();
Function createEvent
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createEvent(data) {
// won't be more than 365 e vents due to constraints we have
const knex = this.client;
const resultingEvent = pick(data, EVENT_FIELDS);
Function getEventTags
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getEventTags(filter) {
const knex = this.client;
const isActive = filter.active;
const startTime = filter.startTime || new Date().toISOString();
const endTime = filter.endTime || moment().add(2, 'month').toISOString();
TODO found Open
// TODO: assert that we do not request something 1 year from now
- Exclude checks
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
query
.joinRaw(`INNER JOIN ${EVENT_TABLE} on ${EVENT_TABLE}.tags @> ARRAY[${EVENT_TAGS_TABLE}.id]`)
.joinRaw((`INNER JOIN ${EVENT_SPANS_TABLE} on (`
+ `${EVENT_TABLE}.id = ${EVENT_SPANS_TABLE}.event_id AND `
+ `${EVENT_SPANS_TABLE}.period && tsrange(TIMESTAMP '${startTime}', TIMESTAMP '${endTime}')`
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const query = knex
.select([
'id',
'title',
'description',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76