Showing 122 of 200 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((newCache[2] = matcher(elem, context, xml))) {
return true;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ($k = 0; $k < $btcount; ++$k) {
if (!$tplfileHandler->delete($tplfiles[$k])) {
$msgs[] = ' <span style="color:#ff0000;">' . _AM_SYSTEM_MODULES_BLOCK_DEPRECATED_ERROR . '(ID: <strong>' . $tplfiles[$k]->getVar('tpl_id') . '</strong>)</span>';
} else {
$msgs[] = ' ' . sprintf(_AM_SYSTEM_MODULES_BLOCK_DEPRECATED, '<strong>' . $tplfiles[$k]->getVar('tpl_file') . '</strong>');
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (ofType ? node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name : node.nodeType === 1) {
return false;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!(unmatched[i] || setMatched[i])) {
setMatched[i] = pop.call(results);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!$moduleHandler->insert($module)) {
$error = true;
}
Function updateContent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
updateContent: function (responseText) {
var receiver = this.container[this.success() ? 'success' : 'failure'],
options = this.options;
if (!options.evalScripts) responseText = responseText.stripScripts();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((elem = matcherOut[i])) {
temp.push((matcherIn[i] = elem));
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ('default' === $xoopsConfig['template_set']) {
if (!xoops_template_touch($tplfile_new->getVar('tpl_id'))) {
$msgs[] = ' <span style="color:#ff0000;">' . sprintf(_AM_SYSTEM_MODULES_TEMPLATE_RECOMPILE_ERROR, '<strong>' . $block['template'] . '</strong>') . '</span>';
} else {
$msgs[] = ' ' . sprintf(_AM_SYSTEM_MODULES_TEMPLATE_RECOMPILE, '<strong>' . $block['template'] . '</strong>');
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!selector) {
push.apply(results, seed);
return results;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (is_file($templateFolder . $v)) {
unlink($templateFolder . $v);
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (matcher[expando]) {
j = ++i;
for (; j < len; j++) {
if (Expr.relative[tokens[j].type]) {
break;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (/\d/.test(value) && element && element.runtimeStyle && !(isPercentage && isViewport)) {
var style = element.style.left, rStyle = element.runtimeStyle.left;
element.runtimeStyle.left = element.currentStyle.left;
element.style.left = value || 0;
value = element.style.pixelLeft;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (child.className && (cn = ' ' + child.className + ' ') && (cn.include(className) ||
(classNames && classNames.all(function (name) {
return !name.toString().blank() && cn.include(' ' + name + ' ');
}))))
elements.push(Element.extend(child));
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (support.matchesSelector && documentIsHTML &&
(!rbuggyMatches || !rbuggyMatches.test(expr)) &&
(!rbuggyQSA || !rbuggyQSA.test(expr))) {
try {
Function condense
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function condense(unmatched, map, filter, context, xml) {
Function superMatcher
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
superMatcher = function (seed, context, xml, results, outermost) {
Function CHILD
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function (type, what, argument, first, last) {
Method truncateHtml
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
string $text,
?int $length = null,
?string $ending = null,
?bool $exact = null,
?bool $considerHtml = null
Function request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
request: function (form, options) {
form = $(form), options = Object.clone(options || {});
var params = options.parameters, action = form.readAttribute('action') || '';
if (action.blank()) action = window.location.href;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function xoopsExternalLinks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function xoopsExternalLinks() {
if (!document.getElementsByTagName) return;
var anchors = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (var i = 0; i < anchors.length; i++) {
var anchor = anchors[i];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"