Showing 36 of 40 total issues
Method convread has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convread(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NumericConversion.new, &block)Method ungetbyte has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ungetbyte(bytes)
raise(IOError, "not opened for reading") unless @readable
return nil if bytes == nil
bytes = bytes.chr if bytes.kind_of?(Fixnum)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(io, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)Method out has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def out(data, mode = 'w', quot = '"', sep = ',', quotenum = false, &block)Method read has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
table << row unless row.empty?Method parse_headers has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_headers(data, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)Method headers has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def headers(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
row << column.convert(false) unless column.empty? && endlineMethod ungetc has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ungetc(chars)
raise(IOError, "not opened for reading") unless @readable
return nil if chars == nil
chars = chars.chr if chars.kind_of?(Fixnum)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(data, quot = '"', sep = ',', quotenum = false, &block)Method append has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def append(data, quot = '"', sep = ',', quotenum = false, &block)Method truncate has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def truncate(len)
raise(IOError, "closing non-duplex IO for writing") unless @writable
raise(TypeError) unless len.respond_to?(:to_int)
length = len.to_int
raise(Errno::EINVAL, "negative length") if (length < 0)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method << has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def <<(ch)
if ch == ?-.ord
@float = @int = size == 0
elsif (ch > ?9.ord || ch < ?0.ord) && ch != ?..ord
@int = @float = false- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method define_mode has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def define_mode(mode=nil)
if mode == nil
# default modes
@string.frozen? ? set_mode_from_string("r") : set_mode_from_string("r+")
elsif mode.is_a?(Integer)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method print has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def print(*args)
raise IOError, "not opened for writing" unless @writable
args << $_ if args.empty?
args.map! { |x| (x == nil) ? "nil" : x }
write((args << $\).flatten.join)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"