Function convertToAPI
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function convertToAPI (node) {
var api = function __ (key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
if (typeof namedValues === 'object' && namedValues !== null) {
return ___(node, key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j)
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convertToAPI
has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function convertToAPI (node) {
var api = function __ (key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
if (typeof namedValues === 'object' && namedValues !== null) {
return ___(node, key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j)
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function _____n
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _____n (node, singular, plural, count, namedValues, args) {
var keys
var fallbackKey
if (count > 1) {
if (typeof plural === 'object' && plural !== null) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ____n
has 15 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ____n (node, singular, plural, count, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function ___n
has 15 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ___n (node, singular, plural, count, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function __n
has 14 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
api.__n = function __n (singular, plural, count, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function absN
has 14 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
api.absN = function absN (singular, plural, count, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function _____n
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _____n (node, singular, plural, count, namedValues, args) {
var keys
var fallbackKey
if (count > 1) {
if (typeof plural === 'object' && plural !== null) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function ___
has 13 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ___ (node, key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function abs
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
api.abs = function abs (key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function api
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var api = function __ (key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function ____n
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ____n (node, singular, plural, count, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
var args
if (j !== undefined) {
args = [count, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j]
} else if (i !== undefined) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ___
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ___ (node, key, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
var args
if (j !== undefined) {
args = [a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j]
} else if (i !== undefined) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ____n
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ____n (node, singular, plural, count, namedValues, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) {
var args
if (j !== undefined) {
args = [count, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j]
} else if (i !== undefined) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function _____n
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _____n (node, singular, plural, count, namedValues, args) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
api.absPrefix = function prefix (prefix, allowModification) {
if (allowModification) {
return convertToAPI(node.absPrefix(prefix, allowModification))
}
var subAPI
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
api.prefix = function (prefix, allowModification) {
if (allowModification) {
return convertToAPI(node.prefix(prefix, allowModification))
}
var subAPI
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76