mbroadst/rethunk

View on GitHub
lib/cursor.js

Summary

Maintainability
D
3 days
Test Coverage

File cursor.js has 353 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"use strict";
var Promise = require('bluebird'),
    EventEmitter = require('events').EventEmitter,
    errors = require('./error.js'),
    helper = require('./helper.js');
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cursor.js - About 4 hrs to fix

    Function _each has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    Cursor.prototype._each = function(callback, onFinish) {
      if (this._closed === true) {
        return callback(new errors.ReqlDriverError('You cannot retrieve data from a cursor that is closed'));
      }
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/cursor.js - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function _eachAsyncInternal has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    Cursor.prototype._eachAsyncInternal = function(callback, finalResolve, finalReject) {
      if (this._closed === true) {
        finalReject(new errors.ReqlDriverError('You cannot retrieve data from a cursor that is closed'));
        return;
      }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/cursor.js - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function _each has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    Cursor.prototype._each = function(callback, onFinish) {
      if (this._closed === true) {
        return callback(new errors.ReqlDriverError('You cannot retrieve data from a cursor that is closed'));
      }
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/cursor.js - About 1 hr to fix

      Function _eachAsyncInternal has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      Cursor.prototype._eachAsyncInternal = function(callback, finalResolve, finalReject) {
        if (this._closed === true) {
          finalReject(new errors.ReqlDriverError('You cannot retrieve data from a cursor that is closed'));
          return;
        }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/cursor.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Function _next has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        Cursor.prototype._next = function(callback) {
          var self = this;
          if (self._closed === true) {
            return Promise.reject(new errors.ReqlDriverError('You cannot call `next` on a closed ' + self._type))
              .nodeify(callback);
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/cursor.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function nextCb has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          var nextCb = function() {
            self._stackSize++;
            self._next().then(function(row) {
              if (self._stackSize <= MAX_CALL_STACK) {
                if (callback.length <= 1) {
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/cursor.js - About 1 hr to fix

          Function _next has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          Cursor.prototype._next = function(callback) {
            var self = this;
            if (self._closed === true) {
              return Promise.reject(new errors.ReqlDriverError('You cannot call `next` on a closed ' + self._type))
                .nodeify(callback);
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/cursor.js - About 1 hr to fix

            Function resolve has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              var resolve = function(data) {
                self._stackSize++;
                var keepGoing = callback(null, data);
                if (keepGoing === false) {
                  if (typeof onFinish === 'function') onFinish();
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/cursor.js - About 1 hr to fix

              Function close has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              Cursor.prototype.close = function(callback) {
                var self = this;
                if (self._closed === true) {
                  return self._closingPromise;
                }
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/cursor.js - About 45 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Function _flush has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              Cursor.prototype._flush = function() {
                while ((this._pendingPromises.length > 0) && ((this._data.length > 0) || ((this._fetching === false) && (this._canFetch === false)))) {
                  var fullfiller = this._pendingPromises.shift();
                  var resolve = fullfiller.resolve;
                  var reject = fullfiller.reject;
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/cursor.js - About 35 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Avoid too many return statements within this function.
              Open

                return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
                  self._pendingPromises.push({resolve: resolve, reject: reject});
                }).nodeify(callback);
              Severity: Major
              Found in lib/cursor.js - About 30 mins to fix

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                            self._next().then(resolve).error(function(error) {
                              if ((error.message !== 'You cannot retrieve data from a cursor that is closed.') &&
                                  (error.message.match(/You cannot call `next` on a closed/) === null)) {
                                reject(error);
                              }
                Severity: Major
                Found in lib/cursor.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                lib/cursor.js on lines 252..257

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 74.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                          self._next().then(resolve).error(function(error) {
                            if ((error.message !== 'You cannot retrieve data from a cursor that is closed.') &&
                                (error.message.match(/You cannot call `next` on a closed/) === null)) {
                              reject(error);
                            }
                Severity: Major
                Found in lib/cursor.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                lib/cursor.js on lines 261..266

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 74.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status