Showing 247 of 412 total issues
Function trigger
has 96 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
var i, cur, tmp, bubbleType, ontype, handle, special, lastElement,
eventPath = [ elem || document ],
type = hasOwn.call( event, "type" ) ? event.type : event,
Function forward
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def forward(self, x):
g_encoder, g_decoder, g_maxpool, g_upsampl, indices = ([0] * 5 for _ in range(5))
for i in range(5):
g_encoder[i], g_decoder[-i - 1] = ([0] * 2 for _ in range(2))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convert_examples_to_features_sc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_examples_to_features_sc(
examples,
tokenizer,
max_length=512,
label_list=None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function xnli_preprocess
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xnli_preprocess(args):
def _preprocess_file(infile, output_dir, split):
all_langs = defaultdict(list)
for i, line in enumerate(open(infile, 'r')):
if i == 0:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function CHILD
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, _argument, first, last ) {
var simple = type.slice( 0, 3 ) !== "nth",
forward = type.slice( -4 ) !== "last",
ofType = what === "of-type";
Function send
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
var i,
xhr = options.xhr();
xhr.open(
Function performTermsSearch
has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
performTermsSearch : function(searchterms, excluded, terms, titleterms) {
var docnames = this._index.docnames;
var filenames = this._index.filenames;
var titles = this._index.titles;
Function add
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
var handleObjIn, eventHandle, tmp,
events, t, handleObj,
special, handlers, type, namespaces, origType,
Function matcherFromGroupMatchers
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function matcherFromGroupMatchers( elementMatchers, setMatchers ) {
var bySet = setMatchers.length > 0,
byElement = elementMatchers.length > 0,
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, outermost ) {
var elem, j, matcher,
Function splitChars
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var splitChars = (function() {
var result = {};
var singles = [96, 180, 187, 191, 215, 247, 749, 885, 903, 907, 909, 930, 1014, 1648,
1748, 1809, 2416, 2473, 2481, 2526, 2601, 2609, 2612, 2615, 2653, 2702,
2706, 2729, 2737, 2740, 2857, 2865, 2868, 2910, 2928, 2948, 2961, 2971,
File conll.py
has 284 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# https://github.com/google-research/xtreme/issues/63
try:
import networkx as nx
except ModuleNotFoundError:
Function setMatcher
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setMatcher( preFilter, selector, matcher, postFilter, postFinder, postSelector ) {
if ( postFilter && !postFilter[ expando ] ) {
postFilter = setMatcher( postFilter );
}
if ( postFinder && !postFinder[ expando ] ) {
Function done
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done( status, nativeStatusText, responses, headers ) {
var isSuccess, success, error, response, modified,
statusText = nativeStatusText;
// Ignore repeat invocations
Function resolve
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function resolve( depth, deferred, handler, special ) {
return function() {
var that = this,
args = arguments,
mightThrow = function() {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( forward && useCache ) {
// Seek `elem` from a previously-cached index
// ...in a gzip-friendly way
Function deepEq
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function deepEq(a, b, aStack, bStack) {
// Unwrap any wrapped objects.
if (a instanceof _$1) a = a._wrapped;
if (b instanceof _$1) b = b._wrapped;
// Compare `[[Class]]` names.
Function superMatcher
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, outermost ) {
var elem, j, matcher,
matchedCount = 0,
i = "0",
unmatched = seed && [],
Function pawsx_preprocess
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pawsx_preprocess(args):
def _preprocess_one_file(infile, outfile, remove_label=False):
data = []
for i, line in enumerate(open(infile, 'r')):
if i == 0:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self):
super(SegNet_MTAN_encoder, self).__init__()
# initialise network parameters
filter = [64, 128, 256, 512, 512]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function write_conll
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_conll(self, list_of_graphs, conll_path,conllformat, print_fused_forms=False,print_comments=False):
# TODO add comment writing
if conllformat == "conllu":
columns = [colname for colname, fname in self.CONLL_U_COLUMNS]
else:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"