Showing 11 of 13 total issues
Class WordConvert
has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class WordConvert < IsoDoc::Iso::WordConvert
def initialize(options)
super
@libdir = File.dirname(__FILE__)
end
Class PresentationXMLConvert
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class PresentationXMLConvert < IsoDoc::Iso::PresentationXMLConvert
def termclause1(elem)
@is_iev or return clause1(elem)
@suppressheadingnumbers || elem["unnumbered"] and return
lbl = @xrefs.anchor(elem["id"], :label, true) or return
Class Converter
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Converter < ISO::Converter
XML_ROOT_TAG = "iec-standard".freeze
XML_NAMESPACE = "https://www.metanorma.org/ns/iec".freeze
register_for "iec"
Method docfunction
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def docfunction(isoxml)
b = isoxml&.at(ns("//bibdata/ext/function#{NOLANG}"))&.text || return
b and set(:function, status_print(b))
b1 = isoxml&.at(ns("//bibdata/ext/function#{currlang}"))&.text || b
b1 and set(:function_display, status_print(b1))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method xref_init
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xref_init(lang, script, _klass, labels, options)
Method tr_parse
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tr_parse(node, out, ord, totalrows, header)
Method make_tr_attr
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_tr_attr(cell, row, totalrows, header, bordered)
Method term_defs_boilerplate
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def term_defs_boilerplate(div, source, term, preface, isodoc)
Method output
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def output(isodoc_node, inname, outname, format, options = {})
Method foreword
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def foreword(sect, out)
out.div **attr_code(id: sect ? sect["id"] : "") do |s|
s.h1(class: "ForewordTitle") { |h1| h1 << @i18n.foreword }
sect&.elements&.each { |e| parse(e, s) unless e.name == "title" }
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method insert_foreword
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def insert_foreword(docxml)
@meta.get[:doctype] == "Amendment" and return
b = docxml.at(ns("//boilerplate/legal-statement")) or return
unless f = docxml.at(ns("//preface/foreword"))
ins = toc_title_insert_pt(docxml)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"