Showing 24 of 30 total issues
Method note_style_cleanup1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def note_style_cleanup1(multi, div, seq)
div.xpath(".//p[@class = 'Note' or not(@class)]")
.each_with_index do |p, i|
p["class"] =
i.zero? && multi ? "IEEEStdsMultipleNotes" : "IEEEStdsSingleNote"- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method title_validate_type has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def title_validate_type(xml)
title = xml.at("//bibdata/title") or return
draft = xml.at("//bibdata//draft")
trial = xml.at("//bibdata/ext/trial-use[text() = 'true']")
target = draft ? "Draft " : ""- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method td_style has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def td_style(cell, idx)
if cell.name == "th" && idx.zero? then stylesmap[:table_head]
elsif cell.name == "th" then stylesmap[:table_subhead]
elsif cell["align"] == "center" ||
cell["style"].include?("text-align:center")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sequential_formula_names has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sequential_formula_names(clause, container: false)
c = Counter.new
clause.xpath(ns(".//formula")).noblank.each do |t|
@anchors[t["id"]] = anchor_struct(
c.increment(t).print, container ? t : nil,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"