Showing 27 of 29 total issues
Method review_note_parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def review_note_parse(node, out)
out.cref **attr_code(anchor: node["id"], display: node["display"],
source: node["reviewer"]) do |c|
if name = node.at(ns("./name"))
name.children.each { |n| parse(n, c) }- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method figure_parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def figure_parse(node, out)
node["class"] == "pseudocode" || node["type"] == "pseudocode" and
return pseudocode_parse(node, out)
@in_figure = true
out.figure **attr_code(anchor: node["id"]) do |div|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method date_attr has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def date_attr(date)
date.nil? and return nil
if date.length == 4 && date =~ /^\d\d\d\d$/ then { year: date }
elsif /^\d\d\d\d-?\d\d$/.match?(date)
m = /^(?<year>\d\d\d\d)-(?<month>\d\d)$/.match date- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method bcp14_cleanup has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bcp14_cleanup(xmldoc)
return unless @bcp_bold
xmldoc.xpath("//strong").each do |s|
next unless BCP_KEYWORDS.include?(s.text)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method which has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def which(cmd)
exts = ENV["PATHEXT"] ? ENV["PATHEXT"].split(";") : [""]
ENV["PATH"].split(File::PATH_SEPARATOR).each do |path|
exts.each do |ext|
exe = File.join(path, "#{cmd}#{ext}")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_postamble has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_postamble(docxml)
docxml.xpath("//figure").each do |f|
a = f.at("./artwork | ./sourcecode") || next
name = f.at("./name")&.remove
b = a.xpath("./preceding-sibling::*")&.remove- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_table_footnote_text has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_table_footnote_text(node, _fnid, fnref)
first = node.first_element_child
noko do |xml|
xml.t **attr_code(anchor: first ? first["id"] : nil) do |div|
div << "[#{fnref}] "- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"