Showing 24 of 28 total issues
Method parse_docrefs_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_docrefs_xml(mnf)
mnf.xpath("xmlns:docref").map do |dr|
h = { "identifier" => parse_docrefs_xml_id(dr) }
%i(fileref url attachment sectionsplit index).each do |s|
h[s.to_s] = dr[s] if dr[s]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_anchors1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_anchors1(key, val, ret)
val[:type] ||= "clause"
ret[val[:type]] ||= {}
index = if val[:container] || val[:label].nil? || val[:label].empty?
UUIDTools::UUID.random_create.to_s
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method docref_to_xml_attrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def docref_to_xml_attrs(elem, docref)
f = docref["fileref"] and elem[:fileref] = @disambig.strip_root(f)
%i(attachment sectionsplit url).each do |i|
elem[i] = docref[i.to_s] if docref[i.to_s]
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract(isodoc, dirname, extract_types)
return unless dirname
extract_types.nil? || extract_types.empty? and
extract_types = %i[sourcecode image requirement]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"