Function notNeeded
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.notNeeded = function(layer) {
var metaViewport;
var chromeVersion;
var blackberryVersion;
var firefoxVersion;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File fastclick.js
has 398 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* @preserve FastClick: polyfill to remove click delays on browsers with touch UIs.
*
* @codingstandard ftlabs-jsv2
* @copyright The Financial Times Limited [All Rights Reserved]
Function onTouchEnd
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.prototype.onTouchEnd = function(event) {
var forElement, trackingClickStart, targetTagName, scrollParent, touch, targetElement = this.targetElement;
if (!this.trackingClick) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function FastClick
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function FastClick(layer, options) {
'use strict';
var oldOnClick;
options = options || {};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function FastClick
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function FastClick(layer, options) {
'use strict';
var oldOnClick;
options = options || {};
Function onTouchEnd
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.prototype.onTouchEnd = function(event) {
var forElement, trackingClickStart, targetTagName, scrollParent, touch, targetElement = this.targetElement;
if (!this.trackingClick) {
return true;
Function notNeeded
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.notNeeded = function(layer) {
var metaViewport;
var chromeVersion;
var blackberryVersion;
var firefoxVersion;
Function onTouchStart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.prototype.onTouchStart = function(event) {
var targetElement, touch, selection;
// Ignore multiple touches, otherwise pinch-to-zoom is prevented if both fingers are on the FastClick element (issue #111).
if (event.targetTouches.length > 1) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onTouchStart
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.prototype.onTouchStart = function(event) {
var targetElement, touch, selection;
// Ignore multiple touches, otherwise pinch-to-zoom is prevented if both fingers are on the FastClick element (issue #111).
if (event.targetTouches.length > 1) {
Function updateScrollParent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.prototype.updateScrollParent = function(targetElement) {
var scrollParent, parentElement;
scrollParent = targetElement.fastClickScrollParent;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onMouse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.prototype.onMouse = function(event) {
// If a target element was never set (because a touch event was never fired) allow the event
if (!this.targetElement) {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return false;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return false;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return false;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return false;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Function needsClick
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
FastClick.prototype.needsClick = function(target) {
switch (target.nodeName.toLowerCase()) {
// Don't send a synthetic click to disabled inputs (issue #62)
case 'button':
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (deviceIsAndroid) {
layer.addEventListener('mouseover', this.onMouse, true);
layer.addEventListener('mousedown', this.onMouse, true);
layer.addEventListener('mouseup', this.onMouse, true);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (deviceIsAndroid) {
layer.removeEventListener('mouseover', this.onMouse, true);
layer.removeEventListener('mousedown', this.onMouse, true);
layer.removeEventListener('mouseup', this.onMouse, true);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76