File utils.js
has 472 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _ = require('underscore');
var semver = require('semver');
var os = require('os');
var url = require('url');
Function defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion = function (v) {
var m = v.match(/^(\d{1,4}(?:\.\d{1,4})*)(?:-([-A-Za-z.]{1,15})(\d{0,4}))?$/);
if (!m) {
return null;
}
Function generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize = function (total, cb) {
// We'll throw this if cb ever returns true, which is a simple way to pop us
// out of our recursion.
var Done = function () {};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function execFileSync
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.execFileSync = function (file, args, opts) {
var child_process = require('child_process');
var { eachline } = require('./eachline');
opts = opts || {};
Function generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize = function (total, cb) {
// We'll throw this if cb ever returns true, which is a simple way to pop us
// out of our recursion.
var Done = function () {};
Function parsePackageAndVersion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.parsePackageAndVersion = function (packageAtVersionString, options) {
var error = null;
var separatorPos = Math.max(packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf(' '),
packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf('@'));
if (separatorPos < 0) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parsePackageAndVersion
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.parsePackageAndVersion = function (packageAtVersionString, options) {
var error = null;
var separatorPos = Math.max(packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf(' '),
packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf('@'));
if (separatorPos < 0) {
Function defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion = function (v) {
var m = v.match(/^(\d{1,4}(?:\.\d{1,4})*)(?:-([-A-Za-z.]{1,15})(\d{0,4}))?$/);
if (!m) {
return null;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getHost
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.getHost = function (...args) {
var ret;
var attempt = function (...args) {
var output = exports.execFileSync(args[0], args.slice(1)).stdout;
if (output) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseUrl
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.parseUrl = function (str, defaults) {
// XXX factor this out into a {type: host/port}?
defaults = defaults || {};
var defaultHostname = defaults.hostname || undefined;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret + '$';
Function execFileAsync
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.execFileAsync = function (file, args, opts) {
opts = opts || {};
var child_process = require('child_process');
var { eachline } = require('./eachline');
var p = child_process.spawn(file, args, opts);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var leftPad = function (chr, len, str) {
if (str.length > len) {
throw Error("too long to pad!");
}
var padding = new Array(len - str.length + 1).join(chr);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var rightPad = function (chr, len, str) {
if (str.length > len) {
throw Error("too long to pad!");
}
var padding = new Array(len - str.length + 1).join(chr);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
return packageVersionParser.validatePackageName(name, options);
} catch (e) {
if (! (e.versionParserError && options && options.useBuildmessage)) {
throw e;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
return packageVersionParser.parsePackageConstraint(constraintString);
} catch (e) {
if (! (e.versionParserError && options && options.useBuildmessage)) {
throw e;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76