meteor/meteor

View on GitHub
tools/utils/utils.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

File utils.js has 472 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

var _ = require('underscore');
var semver = require('semver');
var os = require('os');
var url = require('url');

Severity: Minor
Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 7 hrs to fix

    Function defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    exports.defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion = function (v) {
      var m = v.match(/^(\d{1,4}(?:\.\d{1,4})*)(?:-([-A-Za-z.]{1,15})(\d{0,4}))?$/);
      if (!m) {
        return null;
      }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 1 hr to fix

      Function generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      exports.generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize = function (total, cb) {
        // We'll throw this if cb ever returns true, which is a simple way to pop us
        // out of our recursion.
        var Done = function () {};
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function execFileSync has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      exports.execFileSync = function (file, args, opts) {
        var child_process = require('child_process');
        var { eachline } = require('./eachline');
      
        opts = opts || {};
      Severity: Minor
      Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Function generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        exports.generateSubsetsOfIncreasingSize = function (total, cb) {
          // We'll throw this if cb ever returns true, which is a simple way to pop us
          // out of our recursion.
          var Done = function () {};
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 1 hr to fix

          Function parsePackageAndVersion has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          exports.parsePackageAndVersion = function (packageAtVersionString, options) {
            var error = null;
            var separatorPos = Math.max(packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf(' '),
                                        packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf('@'));
            if (separatorPos < 0) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function parsePackageAndVersion has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          exports.parsePackageAndVersion = function (packageAtVersionString, options) {
            var error = null;
            var separatorPos = Math.max(packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf(' '),
                                        packageAtVersionString.lastIndexOf('@'));
            if (separatorPos < 0) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 1 hr to fix

            Function defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            exports.defaultOrderKeyForReleaseVersion = function (v) {
              var m = v.match(/^(\d{1,4}(?:\.\d{1,4})*)(?:-([-A-Za-z.]{1,15})(\d{0,4}))?$/);
              if (!m) {
                return null;
              }
            Severity: Minor
            Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 55 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function getHost has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            exports.getHost = function (...args) {
              var ret;
              var attempt = function (...args) {
                var output = exports.execFileSync(args[0], args.slice(1)).stdout;
                if (output) {
            Severity: Minor
            Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 55 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function parseUrl has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            exports.parseUrl = function (str, defaults) {
              // XXX factor this out into a {type: host/port}?
            
              defaults = defaults || {};
              var defaultHostname = defaults.hostname || undefined;
            Severity: Minor
            Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 35 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Avoid too many return statements within this function.
            Open

              return ret + '$';
            Severity: Major
            Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 30 mins to fix

              Function execFileAsync has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              exports.execFileAsync = function (file, args, opts) {
                opts = opts || {};
                var child_process = require('child_process');
                var { eachline } = require('./eachline');
                var p = child_process.spawn(file, args, opts);
              Severity: Minor
              Found in tools/utils/utils.js - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                var leftPad = function (chr, len, str) {
                  if (str.length > len) {
                    throw Error("too long to pad!");
                  }
                  var padding = new Array(len - str.length + 1).join(chr);
              Severity: Major
              Found in tools/utils/utils.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              tools/utils/utils.js on lines 378..384

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 74.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                var rightPad = function (chr, len, str) {
                  if (str.length > len) {
                    throw Error("too long to pad!");
                  }
                  var padding = new Array(len - str.length + 1).join(chr);
              Severity: Major
              Found in tools/utils/utils.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              tools/utils/utils.js on lines 371..377

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 74.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                try {
                  return packageVersionParser.validatePackageName(name, options);
                } catch (e) {
                  if (! (e.versionParserError && options && options.useBuildmessage)) {
                    throw e;
              Severity: Major
              Found in tools/utils/utils.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              tools/utils/utils.js on lines 224..232

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 65.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                try {
                  return packageVersionParser.parsePackageConstraint(constraintString);
                } catch (e) {
                  if (! (e.versionParserError && options && options.useBuildmessage)) {
                    throw e;
              Severity: Major
              Found in tools/utils/utils.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              tools/utils/utils.js on lines 236..244

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 65.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              There are no issues that match your filters.

              Category
              Status