Showing 31 of 40 total issues
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 69 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
@actual = actual.is_a?(Class) ? actual : actual.class
metadata = @actual.relations[@association[:name]]
if metadata.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matches?
has 138 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
@actual = actual.is_a?(Class) ? actual : actual.class
metadata = @actual.relations[@association[:name]]
if metadata.nil?
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(klass)
@klass = klass.is_a?(Class) ? klass : klass.class
@errors = []
@attributes.each do |attr|
if @klass.fields.include?(attr)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File associations.rb
has 315 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
if Mongoid::Compatibility::Version.mongoid7_or_newer?
require 'mongoid/association'
else
require 'mongoid/relations'
end
Method type_description
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_description(type = nil, passive = true)
type ||= @association[:type]
case type.name
when EMBEDS_ONE.name
(passive ? 'embed' : 'embeds') << ' one'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class HaveAssociationMatcher
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HaveAssociationMatcher
def initialize(name, association_type)
@association = {}
@association[:name] = name.to_s
@association[:type] = association_type
Method options_message
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def options_message(options)
type_msg = []
comp_msg = []
options.each_pair do |key, value|
case key
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
return false unless result = super(actual)
if @format
if @validator.options[:with] == @format
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(klass)
@model = klass.is_a?(Class) ? klass : klass.class
@errors = []
if model.index_options[index_key]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matches?
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(klass)
@klass = klass.is_a?(Class) ? klass : klass.class
@errors = []
@attributes.each do |attr|
if @klass.fields.include?(attr)
Method matches?
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
return false unless result = super(actual)
if @format
if @validator.options[:with] == @format
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
@klass = actual.is_a?(Class) ? actual : actual.class
@validator = @klass.validators_on(@field).detect do |v|
(v.kind.to_s == @type) && (!v.options[:on] || on_options_matches?(v)) &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(klass)
@klass = klass
if attr_mass_assignable?
if whitelisting?
@negative_failure_message = "#{@attribute} was made accessible"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
return false unless result = super(actual)
if @not_allowed_values
raw_validator_not_allowed_values = @validator.options[:in]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matches?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
return false unless result = super(actual)
if @allowed_values
raw_validator_allowed_values = @validator.options[:in]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_range
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_range
min, max = @within.minmax
if !actual_min.nil? && actual_max.nil?
@negative_result_message << " with no minimum but with maximum of #{actual_max}"
@result = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false