Showing 33 of 52 total issues
File ender.js
has 2318 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* =============================================================
* Ender: open module JavaScript framework (https://ender.no.de)
* Build: ender build jeesh reqwest --output app/assets/javascripts/rails_i18nterface/ender
* =============================================================
Function Event
has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, Event = (function () {
// a whitelist of properties (for different event types) tells us what to check for and copy
var commonProps = str2arr('altKey attrChange attrName bubbles cancelable ctrlKey currentTarget ' +
'detail eventPhase getModifierState isTrusted metaKey relatedNode relatedTarget shiftKey ' +
'srcElement target timeStamp type view which propertyName')
Function init
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function init(o, fn) {
this.url = typeof o == 'string' ? o : o.url
this.timeout = null
Function RegEntry
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, RegEntry = (function () {
// each handler is wrapped so we can handle delegation and custom events
var wrappedHandler = function (element, fn, condition, args) {
var call = function (event, eargs) {
return fn.apply(element, args ? slice.call(eargs, event ? 0 : 1).concat(args) : eargs)
Function registry
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, registry = (function () {
// our map stores arrays by event type, just because it's better than storing
// everything in a single array.
// uses '$' as a prefix for the keys for safety and 'r' as a special prefix for
// rootListeners so we can look them up fast
Function handleJsonp
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function handleJsonp(o, fn, err, url) {
var reqId = uniqid++
, cbkey = o.jsonpCallback || 'callback' // the 'callback' key
, cbval = o.jsonpCallbackName || reqwest.getcallbackPrefix(reqId)
// , cbval = o.jsonpCallbackName || ('reqwest_' + reqId) // the 'callback' value
Function on
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, on = function(element, events, selector, fn) {
var originalFn, type, types, i, args, entry, first
//TODO: the undefined check means you can't pass an 'args' argument, fix this perhaps?
if (selector === undefined && typeof events == 'object') {
Function interpret
has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function interpret(whole, tag, idsAndClasses, wholeAttribute, attribute, qualifier, value, wholePseudo, pseudo, wholePseudoVal, pseudoVal) {
Function offset
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, offset: function (opt_x, opt_y) {
if (opt_x && typeof opt_x == 'object' && (typeof opt_x.top == 'number' || typeof opt_x.left == 'number')) {
return this.each(function (el) {
xy(el, opt_x.left, opt_x.top)
})
Function serial
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function serial(el, cb) {
var n = el.name
, t = el.tagName.toLowerCase()
, optCb = function (o) {
// IE gives value="" even where there is no value attribute
Function css
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, css: function (o, opt_v) {
var p, iter = o
// is this a request for just getting a style?
if (opt_v === undefined && typeof o == 'string') {
// repurpose 'v'
Function dim
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, dim: function () {
if (!this.length) return { height: 0, width: 0 }
var el = this[0]
, de = el.nodeType == 9 && el.documentElement // document
, orig = !de && !!el.style && !el.offsetWidth && !el.offsetHeight ?
Function success
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function success(resp) {
var r = resp.responseText
if (r) {
switch (type) {
case 'json':
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (o) {
o.type && (o.method = o.type) && delete o.type
o.dataType && (o.type = o.dataType)
o.jsonpCallback && (o.jsonpCallbackName = o.jsonpCallback) && delete o.jsonpCallback
o.jsonp && (o.jsonpCallback = o.jsonp)
Method remove_blanks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_blanks(hash)
hash.each do |k, v|
hash.delete k if !v || v == '' || v.is_a?(Proc)
if v.is_a? Hash
remove_blanks v
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method populate_keys
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def populate_keys(root_dir, file)
files = {}
IO.read(file).scan(pattern2).each do |key, key2, count|
key = key || key2
path = relative_path(root_dir, file)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method deep_sort
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deep_sort(object)
if object.is_a?(Hash)
res = {}
object.each { |k, v| res[k] = deep_sort(v) }
Hash[res.sort { |a, b| a[0].to_s <=> b[0].to_s }]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function RegEntry
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, RegEntry = function (element, type, handler, original, namespaces, args, root) {
Function forAll
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
, forAll = function (element, type, original, handler, root, fn) {
Method sort_keys
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sort_keys(order = 'key')
if order == 'key'
@all_keys.sort!
else # text
@all_keys.sort! do |key1, key2|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"