File chosen.jquery.js
has 1109 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
Chosen, a Select Box Enhancer for jQuery and Prototype
by Patrick Filler for Harvest, http://getharvest.com
Version 1.1.0
Function has too many statements (46). Maximum allowed is 30. Open
Chosen = (function(_super) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
enforce a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks (max-statements)
The max-statements
rule allows you to specify the maximum number of statements allowed in a function.
function foo() {
var bar = 1; // one statement
var baz = 2; // two statements
var qux = 3; // three statements
}
Rule Details
This rule enforces a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks.
Options
This rule has a number or object option:
-
"max"
(default10
) enforces a maximum number of statements allows in function blocks
Deprecated: The object property maximum
is deprecated; please use the object property max
instead.
This rule has an object option:
-
"ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true
ignores top-level functions
max
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
};
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
ignoreTopLevelFunctions
Examples of additional correct code for this rule with the { "max": 10 }, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }
options:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }]*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11;
}
Related Rules
- [complexity](complexity.md)
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has too many statements (41). Maximum allowed is 30. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.winnow_results = function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
enforce a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks (max-statements)
The max-statements
rule allows you to specify the maximum number of statements allowed in a function.
function foo() {
var bar = 1; // one statement
var baz = 2; // two statements
var qux = 3; // three statements
}
Rule Details
This rule enforces a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks.
Options
This rule has a number or object option:
-
"max"
(default10
) enforces a maximum number of statements allows in function blocks
Deprecated: The object property maximum
is deprecated; please use the object property max
instead.
This rule has an object option:
-
"ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true
ignores top-level functions
max
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
};
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
ignoreTopLevelFunctions
Examples of additional correct code for this rule with the { "max": 10 }, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }
options:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }]*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11;
}
Related Rules
- [complexity](complexity.md)
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function register_observers
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.register_observers = function() {
var _this = this;
this.container.bind('mousedown.chosen', function(evt) {
_this.container_mousedown(evt);
});
Function has a complexity of 15. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.keyup_checker = function(evt) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 15. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.winnow_results = function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 12. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.set_default_values = function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function winnow_results
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.winnow_results = function() {
var escapedSearchText, option, regex, regexAnchor, results, results_group, searchText, startpos, text, zregex, _i, _len, _ref;
this.no_results_clear();
results = 0;
searchText = this.get_search_text();
Function has a complexity of 9. Open
Chosen.prototype.result_select = function(evt) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 9. Open
Chosen.prototype.keydown_checker = function(evt) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 9. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.set_default_text = function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 8. Open
Chosen.prototype.container_mousedown = function(evt) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 8. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.result_add_option = function(option) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has too many statements (31). Maximum allowed is 30. Open
AbstractChosen = (function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
enforce a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks (max-statements)
The max-statements
rule allows you to specify the maximum number of statements allowed in a function.
function foo() {
var bar = 1; // one statement
var baz = 2; // two statements
var qux = 3; // three statements
}
Rule Details
This rule enforces a maximum number of statements allowed in function blocks.
Options
This rule has a number or object option:
-
"max"
(default10
) enforces a maximum number of statements allows in function blocks
Deprecated: The object property maximum
is deprecated; please use the object property max
instead.
This rule has an object option:
-
"ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true
ignores top-level functions
max
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11; // Too many.
};
Examples of correct code for this rule with the default { "max": 10 }
option:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10]*/
/*eslint-env es6*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
let foo = () => {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
return function () {
// The number of statements in the inner function does not count toward the
// statement maximum.
return 42;
};
}
ignoreTopLevelFunctions
Examples of additional correct code for this rule with the { "max": 10 }, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }
options:
/*eslint max-statements: ["error", 10, { "ignoreTopLevelFunctions": true }]*/
function foo() {
var foo1 = 1;
var foo2 = 2;
var foo3 = 3;
var foo4 = 4;
var foo5 = 5;
var foo6 = 6;
var foo7 = 7;
var foo8 = 8;
var foo9 = 9;
var foo10 = 10;
var foo11 = 11;
}
Related Rules
- [complexity](complexity.md)
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 7. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.results_option_build = function(options) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 7. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.search_string_match = function(search_string, regex) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function has a complexity of 7. Open
Chosen.prototype.set_up_html = function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)
Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x; // 1st path
} else if (false) {
return x+1; // 2nd path
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20
).
Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else if (false) {
return x+1;
} else {
return 4; // 3rd path
}
}
Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:
/*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
function a(x) {
if (true) {
return x;
} else {
return 4;
}
}
Options
Optionally, you may specify a max
object property:
"complexity": ["error", 2]
is equivalent to
"complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]
Deprecated: the object property maximum
is deprecated. Please use the property max
instead.
When Not To Use It
If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [max-depth](max-depth.md)
- [max-len](max-len.md)
- [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
- [max-params](max-params.md)
- [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Function set_up_html
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.set_up_html = function() {
var container_classes, container_props;
container_classes = ["chosen-container"];
container_classes.push("chosen-container-" + (this.is_multiple ? "multi" : "single"));
if (this.inherit_select_classes && this.form_field.className) {
Function result_select
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.result_select = function(evt) {
var high, item;
if (this.result_highlight) {
high = this.result_highlight;
this.result_clear_highlight();
Function keyup_checker
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.keyup_checker = function(evt) {
var stroke, _ref;
stroke = (_ref = evt.which) != null ? _ref : evt.keyCode;
this.search_field_scale();
switch (stroke) {
Function result_add_option
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
AbstractChosen.prototype.result_add_option = function(option) {
var classes, option_el;
if (!option.search_match) {
return '';
}
Function keydown_checker
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.keydown_checker = function(evt) {
var stroke, _ref1;
stroke = (_ref1 = evt.which) != null ? _ref1 : evt.keyCode;
this.search_field_scale();
if (stroke !== 8 && this.pending_backstroke) {
Function add_option
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
SelectParser.prototype.add_option = function(option, group_position, group_disabled) {
if (option.nodeName.toUpperCase() === "OPTION") {
if (option.text !== "") {
if (group_position != null) {
this.parsed[group_position].children += 1;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (results_group != null) {
results_group.group_match = true;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ((option.group_array_index != null) && this.results_data[option.group_array_index].search_match) {
option.search_match = true;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (searchText.length) {
startpos = option.search_text.search(zregex);
text = option.search_text.substr(0, startpos + searchText.length) + '</em>' + option.search_text.substr(startpos + searchText.length);
option.search_text = text.substr(0, startpos) + '<em>' + text.substr(startpos);
}
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
this.allow_single_deselect = (this.options.allow_single_deselect != null) && (this.form_field.options[0] != null) && this.form_field.options[0].text === "" ? this.options.allow_single_deselect : false;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
this.enable_split_word_search = this.options.enable_split_word_search != null ? this.options.enable_split_word_search : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
this.enable_split_word_search = this.options.enable_split_word_search != null ? this.options.enable_split_word_search : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
} else if ((option.group_array_index != null) && this.results_data[option.group_array_index].search_match) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (delta != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '===' and instead saw '=='. Open
if (text == null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
this.options = options != null ? options : {};
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (option.group_array_index != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
} else if ((option.group_array_index != null) && this.results_data[option.group_array_index].search_match) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.active_field = true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
return this.display_disabled_options = this.options.display_disabled_options != null ? this.options.display_disabled_options : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (option.group_array_index != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if ((option.group_array_index != null) && this.results_data[option.group_array_index]) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
stroke = (_ref = evt.which) != null ? _ref : evt.keyCode;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.mouse_on_container = false;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (options != null ? options.first : void 0) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (!((evt != null) && ($(evt.target)).hasClass("search-choice-close"))) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
stroke = (_ref1 = evt.which) != null ? _ref1 : evt.keyCode;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '===' and instead saw '=='. Open
if ((text == null) || text === false) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
this.allow_single_deselect = (this.options.allow_single_deselect != null) && (this.form_field.options[0] != null) && this.form_field.options[0].text === "" ? this.options.allow_single_deselect : false;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
this.display_selected_options = this.options.display_selected_options != null ? this.options.display_selected_options : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.display_disabled_options = this.options.display_disabled_options != null ? this.options.display_disabled_options : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (group_position != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.options_index += 1;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if ((text == null) || text === false) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (this.selected_option_count != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
this.allow_single_deselect = (this.options.allow_single_deselect != null) && (this.form_field.options[0] != null) && this.form_field.options[0].text === "" ? this.options.allow_single_deselect : false;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
this.display_selected_options = this.options.display_selected_options != null ? this.options.display_selected_options : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (this.options.width != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (delta != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
this.group_search = this.options.group_search != null ? this.options.group_search : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (results_group != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (this.options.width != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.results_none_found = this.form_field.getAttribute("data-no_results_text") || this.options.no_results_text || AbstractChosen.default_no_result_text;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
stroke = (_ref = evt.which) != null ? _ref : evt.keyCode;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (!((evt != null) && ($(evt.target)).hasClass("search-choice-close"))) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if (do_high != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.pending_backstroke = null;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
this.single_backstroke_delete = this.options.single_backstroke_delete != null ? this.options.single_backstroke_delete : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.results_showing = false;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (text == null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
this.options = options != null ? options : {};
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (results_group != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (do_high != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
stroke = (_ref1 = evt.which) != null ? _ref1 : evt.keyCode;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (group_position != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
this.single_backstroke_delete = this.options.single_backstroke_delete != null ? this.options.single_backstroke_delete : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
return this.display_disabled_options = this.options.display_disabled_options != null ? this.options.display_disabled_options : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
this.allow_single_deselect = (this.options.allow_single_deselect != null) && (this.form_field.options[0] != null) && this.form_field.options[0].text === "" ? this.options.allow_single_deselect : false;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (this.selected_option_count != null) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
if ((option.group_array_index != null) && this.results_data[option.group_array_index]) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.is_rtl = this.form_field_jq.hasClass("chosen-rtl");
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='. Open
this.group_search = this.options.group_search != null ? this.options.group_search : true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require === and !== (eqeqeq)
It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators ===
and !==
instead of their regular counterparts ==
and !=
.
The reason for this is that ==
and !=
do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm.
For instance, the following statements are all considered true
:
[] == false
[] == ![]
3 == "03"
If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b
the actual problem is very difficult to spot.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
if (x == 42) { }
if ("" == text) { }
if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }
The --fix
option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof
expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.
Options
always
The "always"
option (default) enforces the use of ===
and !==
in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null
[see below]).
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a == b
foo == true
bananas != 1
value == undefined
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
a === b
foo === true
bananas !== 1
value === undefined
typeof foo === 'undefined'
'hello' !== 'world'
0 === 0
true === true
foo === null
This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:
-
"null"
: Customize how this rule treatsnull
literals. Possible values:-
always
(default) - Always use === or !==. -
never
- Never use === or !== withnull
. -
ignore
- Do not apply this rule tonull
.
-
smart
The "smart"
option enforces the use of ===
and !==
except for these cases:
- Comparing two literal values
- Evaluating the value of
typeof
- Comparing against
null
Examples of incorrect code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
// comparing two variables requires ===
a == b
// only one side is a literal
foo == true
bananas != 1
// comparing to undefined requires ===
value == undefined
Examples of correct code for the "smart"
option:
/*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
typeof foo == 'undefined'
'hello' != 'world'
0 == 0
true == true
foo == null
allow-null
Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null
literal.
["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]
When Not To Use It
If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.mouse_on_container = true;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’. Open
if (options != null ? options.first : void 0) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)
Comparing to null
without a type-checking operator (==
or !=
), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null
, but also an undefined
value.
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
Rule Details
The no-eq-null
rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null
only match null
, and not also undefined
. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using ==
and !=
.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo == null) {
bar();
}
while (qux != null) {
baz();
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
if (foo === null) {
bar();
}
while (qux !== null) {
baz();
}
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.parsing = false;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.result_highlight = null;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Return statement should not contain assignment. Open
return this.search_field[0].tabIndex = ti;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow Assignment in return Statement (no-return-assign)
One of the interesting, and sometimes confusing, aspects of JavaScript is that assignment can happen at almost any point. Because of this, an errant equals sign can end up causing assignment when the true intent was to do a comparison. This is especially true when using a return
statement. For example:
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
It is difficult to tell the intent of the return
statement here. It's possible that the function is meant to return the result of bar + 2
, but then why is it assigning to foo
? It's also possible that the intent was to use a comparison operator such as ==
and that this code is an error.
Because of this ambiguity, it's considered a best practice to not use assignment in return
statements.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate assignments from return
statements. As such, it will warn whenever an assignment is found as part of return
.
Options
The rule takes one option, a string, which must contain one of the following values:
-
except-parens
(default): Disallow assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses. -
always
: Disallow all assignments.
except-parens
This is the default option. It disallows assignments unless they are enclosed in parentheses.
Examples of incorrect code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
Examples of correct code for the default "except-parens"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: "error"*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
always
This option disallows all assignments in return
statements.
All assignments are treated as problems.
Examples of incorrect code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo = bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo += 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return (foo = bar + 2);
}
Examples of correct code for the "always"
option:
/*eslint no-return-assign: ["error", "always"]*/
function doSomething() {
return foo == bar + 2;
}
function doSomething() {
return foo === bar + 2;
}
When Not To Use It
If you want to allow the use of assignment operators in a return
statement, then you can safely disable this rule.
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected 'undefined' and instead saw 'void'. Open
_results.push(void 0);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow use of the void operator. (no-void)
The void
operator takes an operand and returns undefined
: void expression
will evaluate expression
and return undefined
. It can be used to ignore any side effects expression
may produce:
The common case of using void
operator is to get a "pure" undefined
value as prior to ES5 the undefined
variable was mutable:
// will always return undefined
(function(){
return void 0;
})();
// will return 1 in ES3 and undefined in ES5+
(function(){
undefined = 1;
return undefined;
})();
// will throw TypeError in ES5+
(function(){
'use strict';
undefined = 1;
})();
Another common case is to minify code as void 0
is shorter than undefined
:
foo = void 0;
foo = undefined;
When used with IIFE (immediately-invoked function expression), void
can be used to force the function keyword to be treated as an expression instead of a declaration:
var foo = 1;
void function(){ foo = 1; }() // will assign foo a value of 1
+function(){ foo = 1; }() // same as above
function(){ foo = 1; }() // will throw SyntaxError
Some code styles prohibit void
operator, marking it as non-obvious and hard to read.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate use of void operator.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-void: "error"*/
void foo
var foo = void bar();
When Not To Use It
If you intentionally use the void
operator then you can disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [no-undef-init](no-undef-init.md)
- [no-undefined](no-undefined.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Expected 'undefined' and instead saw 'void'. Open
if (options != null ? options.first : void 0) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Disallow use of the void operator. (no-void)
The void
operator takes an operand and returns undefined
: void expression
will evaluate expression
and return undefined
. It can be used to ignore any side effects expression
may produce:
The common case of using void
operator is to get a "pure" undefined
value as prior to ES5 the undefined
variable was mutable:
// will always return undefined
(function(){
return void 0;
})();
// will return 1 in ES3 and undefined in ES5+
(function(){
undefined = 1;
return undefined;
})();
// will throw TypeError in ES5+
(function(){
'use strict';
undefined = 1;
})();
Another common case is to minify code as void 0
is shorter than undefined
:
foo = void 0;
foo = undefined;
When used with IIFE (immediately-invoked function expression), void
can be used to force the function keyword to be treated as an expression instead of a declaration:
var foo = 1;
void function(){ foo = 1; }() // will assign foo a value of 1
+function(){ foo = 1; }() // same as above
function(){ foo = 1; }() // will throw SyntaxError
Some code styles prohibit void
operator, marking it as non-obvious and hard to read.
Rule Details
This rule aims to eliminate use of void operator.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-void: "error"*/
void foo
var foo = void bar();
When Not To Use It
If you intentionally use the void
operator then you can disable this rule.
Further Reading
Related Rules
- [no-undef-init](no-undef-init.md)
- [no-undefined](no-undefined.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Move the invocation into the parens that contain the function. Open
SelectParser = (function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require IIFEs to be Wrapped (wrap-iife)
You can immediately invoke function expressions, but not function declarations. A common technique to create an immediately-invoked function expression (IIFE) is to wrap a function declaration in parentheses. The opening parentheses causes the contained function to be parsed as an expression, rather than a declaration.
// function expression could be unwrapped
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}();
// function declaration must be wrapped
function () { /* side effects */ }(); // SyntaxError
Rule Details
This rule requires all immediately-invoked function expressions to be wrapped in parentheses.
Options
This rule has two options, a string option and an object option.
String option:
-
"outside"
enforces always wrapping the call expression. The default is"outside"
. -
"inside"
enforces always wrapping the function expression. -
"any"
enforces always wrapping, but allows either style.
Object option:
-
"functionPrototypeMethods": true
additionally enforces wrapping function expressions invoked using.call
and.apply
. The default isfalse
.
outside
Examples of incorrect code for the default "outside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
Examples of correct code for the default "outside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
inside
Examples of incorrect code for the "inside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
Examples of correct code for the "inside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
any
Examples of incorrect code for the "any"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
Examples of correct code for the "any"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
functionPrototypeMethods
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true }
options:
/* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
var x = function(){ foo(); }()
var x = (function(){ foo(); }())
var x = function(){ foo(); }.call(bar)
var x = (function(){ foo(); }.call(bar))
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true }
options:
/* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
var x = (function(){ foo(); })()
var x = (function(){ foo(); }).call(bar)
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Move the invocation into the parens that contain the function. Open
AbstractChosen = (function() {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require IIFEs to be Wrapped (wrap-iife)
You can immediately invoke function expressions, but not function declarations. A common technique to create an immediately-invoked function expression (IIFE) is to wrap a function declaration in parentheses. The opening parentheses causes the contained function to be parsed as an expression, rather than a declaration.
// function expression could be unwrapped
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}();
// function declaration must be wrapped
function () { /* side effects */ }(); // SyntaxError
Rule Details
This rule requires all immediately-invoked function expressions to be wrapped in parentheses.
Options
This rule has two options, a string option and an object option.
String option:
-
"outside"
enforces always wrapping the call expression. The default is"outside"
. -
"inside"
enforces always wrapping the function expression. -
"any"
enforces always wrapping, but allows either style.
Object option:
-
"functionPrototypeMethods": true
additionally enforces wrapping function expressions invoked using.call
and.apply
. The default isfalse
.
outside
Examples of incorrect code for the default "outside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
Examples of correct code for the default "outside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
inside
Examples of incorrect code for the "inside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
Examples of correct code for the "inside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
any
Examples of incorrect code for the "any"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
Examples of correct code for the "any"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
functionPrototypeMethods
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true }
options:
/* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
var x = function(){ foo(); }()
var x = (function(){ foo(); }())
var x = function(){ foo(); }.call(bar)
var x = (function(){ foo(); }.call(bar))
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true }
options:
/* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
var x = (function(){ foo(); })()
var x = (function(){ foo(); }).call(bar)
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Move the invocation into the parens that contain the function. Open
Chosen = (function(_super) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require IIFEs to be Wrapped (wrap-iife)
You can immediately invoke function expressions, but not function declarations. A common technique to create an immediately-invoked function expression (IIFE) is to wrap a function declaration in parentheses. The opening parentheses causes the contained function to be parsed as an expression, rather than a declaration.
// function expression could be unwrapped
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}();
// function declaration must be wrapped
function () { /* side effects */ }(); // SyntaxError
Rule Details
This rule requires all immediately-invoked function expressions to be wrapped in parentheses.
Options
This rule has two options, a string option and an object option.
String option:
-
"outside"
enforces always wrapping the call expression. The default is"outside"
. -
"inside"
enforces always wrapping the function expression. -
"any"
enforces always wrapping, but allows either style.
Object option:
-
"functionPrototypeMethods": true
additionally enforces wrapping function expressions invoked using.call
and.apply
. The default isfalse
.
outside
Examples of incorrect code for the default "outside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
Examples of correct code for the default "outside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
inside
Examples of incorrect code for the "inside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
Examples of correct code for the "inside"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
any
Examples of incorrect code for the "any"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
Examples of correct code for the "any"
option:
/*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression
functionPrototypeMethods
Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true }
options:
/* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
var x = function(){ foo(); }()
var x = (function(){ foo(); }())
var x = function(){ foo(); }.call(bar)
var x = (function(){ foo(); }.call(bar))
Examples of correct code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true }
options:
/* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
var x = (function(){ foo(); })()
var x = (function(){ foo(); }).call(bar)
Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
AbstractChosen = (function() {
function AbstractChosen(form_field, options) {
this.form_field = form_field;
this.options = options != null ? options : {};
if (!AbstractChosen.browser_is_supported()) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 4139.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
SelectParser = (function() {
function SelectParser() {
this.options_index = 0;
this.parsed = [];
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 729.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.single_set_selected_text = function(text) {
if (text == null) {
text = this.default_text;
}
if (text === this.default_text) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
__extends = function(child, parent) { for (var key in parent) { if (__hasProp.call(parent, key)) child[key] = parent[key]; } function ctor() { this.constructor = child; } ctor.prototype = parent.prototype; child.prototype = new ctor(); child.__super__ = parent.prototype; return child; };
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
SelectParser.select_to_array = function(select) {
var child, parser, _i, _len, _ref;
parser = new SelectParser();
_ref = select.childNodes;
for (_i = 0, _len = _ref.length; _i < _len; _i++) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 116.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.results_hide = function() {
if (this.results_showing) {
this.result_clear_highlight();
this.container.removeClass("chosen-with-drop");
this.form_field_jq.trigger("chosen:hiding_dropdown", {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 89.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (_i = 0, _len = styles.length; _i < _len; _i++) {
style = styles[_i];
style_block += style + ":" + this.search_field.css(style) + ";";
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (prev_sibs.length) {
return this.result_do_highlight(prev_sibs.first());
} else {
if (this.choices_count() > 0) {
this.results_hide();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else {
this.search_container = this.container.find('div.chosen-search').first();
this.selected_item = this.container.find('.chosen-single').first();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.is_multiple) {
this.search_choices = this.container.find('ul.chosen-choices').first();
this.search_container = this.container.find('li.search-field').first();
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.form_field_label.length > 0) {
return this.form_field_label.bind('click.chosen', function(evt) {
if (_this.is_multiple) {
return _this.container_mousedown(evt);
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.container_mouseup = function(evt) {
if (evt.target.nodeName === "ABBR" && !this.is_disabled) {
return this.results_reset(evt);
}
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
target = $(evt.target).hasClass("active-result") ? $(evt.target) : $(evt.target).parents(".active-result").first();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
target = $(evt.target).hasClass("active-result") ? $(evt.target) : $(evt.target).parents(".active-result").first();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.blur_test = function(evt) {
if (!this.active_field && this.container.hasClass("chosen-container-active")) {
return this.close_field();
}
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.result_clear_highlight = function() {
if (this.result_highlight) {
this.result_highlight.removeClass("highlighted");
}
return this.result_highlight = null;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Chosen.prototype.clear_backstroke = function() {
if (this.pending_backstroke) {
this.pending_backstroke.removeClass("search-choice-focus");
}
return this.pending_backstroke = null;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.is_multiple && this.max_selected_options <= this.choices_count()) {
this.form_field_jq.trigger("chosen:maxselected", {
chosen: this
});
return false;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.is_multiple && this.max_selected_options <= this.choices_count()) {
this.form_field_jq.trigger("chosen:maxselected", {
chosen: this
});
return false;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
container_props = {
'class': container_classes.join(' '),
'style': "width: " + (this.container_width()) + ";",
'title': this.form_field.title
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.form_field.id.length) {
container_props.id = this.form_field.id.replace(/[^\w]/g, '_') + "_chosen";
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 9:
if (this.results_showing && !this.is_multiple) {
this.result_select(evt);
}
this.mouse_on_container = false;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76