nanoexpress/nanoexpress

View on GitHub
src/Route.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
6 days
Test Coverage

Function _prepareMethod has 338 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  _prepareMethod(method, { originalUrl, path }, ...middlewares) {
    const { _config, _baseUrl, _middlewares, _ajv, _console } = this;

    const fetchMethod = method === 'ANY';
    const isWebSocket = method === 'WS';
Severity: Major
Found in src/Route.js - About 1 day to fix

    Function _prepareMethod has a Cognitive Complexity of 63 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      _prepareMethod(method, { originalUrl, path }, ...middlewares) {
        const { _config, _baseUrl, _middlewares, _ajv, _console } = this;
    
        const fetchMethod = method === 'ANY';
        const isWebSocket = method === 'WS';
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/Route.js - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    File Route.js has 535 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    import Events from '@dalisoft/events';
    import fastQueryParse from 'fast-query-parse';
    import { Route as RouteCompiler } from './compilers/index.js';
    import {
      httpMethods,
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/Route.js - About 1 day to fix

      Function use has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        use(path, ...middlewares) {
          let { _middlewares } = this;
      
          if (!_middlewares) {
            _middlewares = [];
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/Route.js - About 4 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function wsExpose has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      Route.prototype.ws = function wsExpose(path, handler, options = {}) {
        const { _baseUrl, _module, _ajv, _app } = this;
        const { isRaw, isStrictRaw, schema } = options;
      
        if (typeof handler === 'object') {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/Route.js - About 4 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function wsExpose has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      Route.prototype.ws = function wsExpose(path, handler, options = {}) {
        const { _baseUrl, _module, _ajv, _app } = this;
        const { isRaw, isStrictRaw, schema } = options;
      
        if (typeof handler === 'object') {
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/Route.js - About 3 hrs to fix

        Function use has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          use(path, ...middlewares) {
            let { _middlewares } = this;
        
            if (!_middlewares) {
              _middlewares = [];
        Severity: Major
        Found in src/Route.js - About 2 hrs to fix

          Function upgrade has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              async upgrade(res, req, context) {
                const secWsKey = req.getHeader('sec-websocket-key');
                const secWsProtocol = req.getHeader('sec-websocket-protocol');
                const secWsExtensions = req.getHeader('sec-websocket-extensions');
          
          
          Severity: Minor
          Found in src/Route.js - About 1 hr to fix

            Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
            Open

                          if (
                            req.headers &&
                            ((!isRaw && bodyAllowedMethod && res.onData) ||
                              req.headers['transfer-encoding'] ||
                              (req.headers['content-length'] &&
            Severity: Major
            Found in src/Route.js - About 1 hr to fix

              Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
              Open

                          if (middleware._middlewares !== _middlewares) {
                            middleware._middlewares = _middlewares
                              .concat(middleware._middlewares)
                              .filter(
                                (currentMiddleware, index, self) =>
              Severity: Major
              Found in src/Route.js - About 45 mins to fix

                Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                Open

                              if (!valid) {
                                ws.emit(
                                  'message',
                                  {
                                    type: 'websocket.message',
                Severity: Major
                Found in src/Route.js - About 45 mins to fix

                  Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
                  Open

                                if (
                                  !isRaw &&
                                  !res._modifiedEnd &&
                                  (!res.writeHead.notModified ||
                                    (res.statusCode && res.statusCode !== 200) ||
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/Route.js - About 40 mins to fix

                    Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                    Open

                                  return routeFunction(req, res);
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in src/Route.js - About 30 mins to fix

                      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                                  if (
                                    fetchUrl &&
                                    reqPathLength > 1 &&
                                    req.path.charAt(reqPathLength - 1) === '/'
                                  ) {
                      Severity: Major
                      Found in src/Route.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                      src/Route.js on lines 306..312

                      Duplicated Code

                      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                      Tuning

                      This issue has a mass of 69.

                      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                      Refactorings

                      Further Reading

                      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                                    if (
                                      fetchUrl &&
                                      reqPathLength > 1 &&
                                      req.path.charAt(reqPathLength - 1) === '/'
                                    ) {
                      Severity: Major
                      Found in src/Route.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                      src/Route.js on lines 370..376

                      Duplicated Code

                      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                      Tuning

                      This issue has a mass of 69.

                      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                      Refactorings

                      Further Reading

                      There are no issues that match your filters.

                      Category
                      Status