Showing 18 of 26 total issues
Method on_send has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_send(node) # rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength
expect_literal(node) do |actual, send_node, matcher, expected|
next if SKIPPED_MATCHERS.include?(matcher)
add_offense(actual) do |corrector|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_duplicates has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_duplicates(node)
setup_expressions = Set.new
node.each_child_node(:block) do |child|
next unless common_setup?(child)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_explicit has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_explicit(node) # rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength
predicate_matcher_block?(node) do |actual, matcher|
add_offense(node, message: message_explicit(matcher)) do |corrector|
to_node = node.send_node
corrector_explicit(corrector, to_node, actual, matcher, to_node)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_let_declarations has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_let_declarations(node)
first_example = find_first_example(node)
return unless first_example
correct = !example_group_with_include_examples?(node)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method corrector_explicit has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def corrector_explicit(corrector, to_node, actual, matcher, block_child)Method on_send has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_send(node)
return if node.chained? || node.each_ancestor(:def, :defs).any?
focus_metadata(node) do |focus|
add_offense(focus) do |corrector|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_top_level_group has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_top_level_group(node)
ivar_usage(node) do |ivar, name|
next if valid_usage?(ivar)
next if assignment_only? && !ivar_assigned?(node, name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_expect_to has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_expect_to(node)
node.each_ancestor.find do |ancestor|
break if ancestor.block_type?
next unless ancestor.send_type?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_send has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_send(node)
return unless inside_example_group?(node)
variable_definition?(node) do |variable|
return if variable.dstr_type? || variable.dsym_type?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_send has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_send(node)
return if node.parent.block_type? || node.arguments.empty?
return unless replaceable_arguments?(node)
method_name = node.method_name.to_s- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_send has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_send(node)
return unless inside_example_group?(node)
variable_definition?(node) do |variable|
next unless style_offense?(variable)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_block has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_block(node) # rubocop:disable InternalAffairs/NumblockHandler
return if node.each_ancestor(:def, :defs).any?
return if node.each_ancestor(:block).any? { |block| example?(block) }
example_group_body(node) do |body|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parent_node has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parent_node(node)
node_or_block = node.block_node || node
return unless (parent = node_or_block.parent)
parent.begin_type? && parent.parent ? parent.parent : parent- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_send has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_send(node)
unverified_double(node) do |name, *_args|
return if name.nil? && cop_config['IgnoreNameless']
return if symbol?(name) && cop_config['IgnoreSymbolicNames']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_block has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_block(node) # rubocop:disable InternalAffairs/NumblockHandler
return unless example?(node)
null_double(node) do |var, receiver|
have_received_usage(node) do |expected|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_hooks has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_hooks(node)
first_example = find_first_example(node)
return unless first_example
first_example.right_siblings.each do |sibling|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_top_level_example_group has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_top_level_example_group(node)
return unless top_level_groups.one?
example_group_arguments(node) do |send_node, class_name, arguments|
next if !class_name.const_type? || ignore_metadata?(arguments)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method offensive? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def offensive?(body)
return true unless body
return false if conditionals_with_examples?(body)
if body.if_type? || body.case_type?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"