Sign upLogin

nodef/extra-map

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 8 of 34 total issues

File index.ts has 542 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

import {
  IDENTITY,
  COMPARE,
} from "extra-function";
import {
Severity: Major
Found in src/index.ts - About 1 day to fix

    Function cartesianProduct has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    export function* cartesianProduct<K, V, W=Map<K, V>>(xs: Map<K, V>[], fm: MapFunction<number, Map<K, V>, Map<K, V>|W> | null=null): IterableIterator<Map<K, V>|W> {
  var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
  var XS = xs.length;
  var kx = xs.map(x => [...x.keys()]);
  var ls = kx.map(ks => ks.length);
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/index.ts - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function intersectionKeys has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    export function intersectionKeys<K, V>(...xs: Map<K, V>[]): Set<K> {
  var a = new Set<K>();
  if (xs.length===0) return a;
  var x = xs[0], ys = xs.slice(1);
  LOOPX: for (var k of x.keys()) {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/index.ts - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function flatTo$ has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    function flatTo$<K>(a: Map<K, any>, x: Map<K, any>, n: number, fm: MapFunction<K, any, any>, ft: TestFunction<K, any>): Map<K, any> {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/index.ts - About 35 mins to fix

      Function compare has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      export function compare<K, V, W=V>(x: Map<K, V>, y: Map<K, V>, fc: CompareFunction<V|W> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<K, V, V|W> | null=null): number {
  var fc = fc || COMPARE;
  var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
  var ks = unionKeys(x, y);
  for (var k of ks) {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/index.ts - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function hasSubset has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      export function hasSubset<K, V, W=V>(x: Map<K, V>, y: Map<K, V>, fc: CompareFunction<V|W> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<K, V, V|W> | null=null): boolean {
  var fc = fc || COMPARE;
  var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
  for (var [k, v] of y) {
    if (!x.has(k)) return false;
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/index.ts - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function generateWiki has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      function generateWiki(ds) {
  var rkind = /namespace|function/i, useWiki = true;
  var dm = new Map(ds.map(d => [d.name, d]));
  for (var d of ds) {
    var f = `wiki/${d.name}.md`;
      Severity: Minor
      Found in build.js - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function zip has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      export function zip<K, V, W=V>(xs: Map<K, V>[], fm: MapFunction<K, V[], V[]|W> | null=null, fe: EndFunction=null, vd?: V): Map<K, V[]|W> {
  var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
  var fe = fe || arraySome as EndFunction;
  var ks = unionKeys(...xs), a = new Map();
  for (var k of ks) {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/index.ts - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Severity
      Category
      Status
      Source
      Language