Showing 10 of 29 total issues
File index.ts
has 329 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import {
IDENTITY,
COMPARE,
} from "extra-function";
import {
Function rangedMerge
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function rangedMerge<T, U=T>(x: T[], i: number, I: number, y: T[], j: number, J: number, fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): T[] {
Function symmetricDifference
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function symmetricDifference<T, U=T>(x: T[], y: T[], fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): T[] {
var fc = fc || COMPARE;
var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
var a = [];
for (var i=0, j=0, I=x.length, J=y.length; i<I && j<J;) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function union
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function union<T, U=T>(x: T[], y: T[], fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): T[] {
var fc = fc || COMPARE;
var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
var a = [];
for (var i=0, j=0, I=x.length, J=y.length; i<I && j<J;) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateWiki
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function generateWiki(ds) {
var rkind = /namespace|function/i, useWiki = true;
var dm = new Map(ds.map(d => [d.name, d]));
for (var d of ds) {
var f = `wiki/${d.name}.md`;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function difference
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function difference<T, U=T>(x: T[], y: T[], fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): T[] {
var fc = fc || COMPARE;
var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
var a = [];
for (var i=0, j=0, I=x.length, J=y.length; i<I && j<J;) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function intersection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function intersection<T, U=T>(x: T[], y: T[], fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): T[] {
var fc = fc || COMPARE;
var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
var a = [];
for (var i=0, j=0, I=x.length, J=y.length; i<I && j<J;) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function searchValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function searchValue<T, U=T>(x: T[], v: T, fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): number {
var fc = fc || COMPARE;
var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
var w = fm(v, 0, null);
for (var i=0, I=x.length; i<I;) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function rangedMerge
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function rangedMerge<T, U=T>(x: T[], i: number, I: number, y: T[], j: number, J: number, fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): T[] {
var fc = fc || COMPARE;
var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
var a = [];
while (i<I && j<J) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mergeAll
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function mergeAll<T, U=T>(xs: T[][], fc: CompareFunction<T|U> | null=null, fm: MapFunction<T, T|U> | null=null): T[] {
var fc = fc || COMPARE;
var fm = fm || IDENTITY;
// Merge in a binary tree fashion.
while (xs.length>1) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"