Showing 162 of 333 total issues
Function _callee
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, customize, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
Function send
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { from, to, text, type, ttl, messageClass } =
request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const response = await fetch('https://rest.nexmo.com/sms/json', {
method: 'POST',
Function channel
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
acc[channel] = _this.providers[channel].length > 0 ? strategies[channel](_this.providers[channel]) : (/*#__PURE__*/function () {
var _ref = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var provider;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function _callee$
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
_providers = (0, _toArray2["default"])(providers), current = _providers[0], others = _providers.slice(1);
_context.prev = 1;
Function _callee3
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _ref3 = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee3(channel) {
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee3$(_context3) {
while (1) switch (_context3.prev = _context3.next) {
case 0:
_context3.prev = 0;
Function _callee2$
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee2$(_context2) {
while (1) switch (_context2.prev = _context2.next) {
case 0:
_context2.next = 2;
return this.sendOnEachChannel(request);
Function _callee$
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee$
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee$
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function send
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { id, userId, from, to, text, type, nature } =
request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const response = await fetch('https://api.callr.com/rest/v1.1/sms', {
method: 'POST',
Function send
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { from, text, to, type, ttl, messageClass } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const params = {
flash: messageClass === 0 ? 1 : 0,
from,
Function factory
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function factory(_ref) {
var type = _ref.type,
config = (0, _objectWithoutProperties2["default"])(_ref, _excluded);
switch (type) {
// Development
Function send
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { id, to, text, type, ttl } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const response = await fetch('https://platform.clickatell.com/messages', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
Function _callee3$
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee3$(_context3) {
while (1) switch (_context3.prev = _context3.next) {
case 0:
_context3.prev = 0;
_context3.t0 = _objectSpread;
Function send
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { id, to, text, type, ttl } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const response = await fetch('https://platform.clickatell.com/messages', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _objectSpread
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _objectSpread
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _objectSpread
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _objectSpread
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _objectSpread
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"