Function AMTparseExpr has a Cognitive Complexity of 155 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTparseExpr(str, rightbracket) {
let symbol;
let node;
let result;
let i;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File ASCIIMathTeXImg.js has 888 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
ASCIIMathTeXImg.js
Based on ASCIIMathML, Version 1.4.7 Aug 30, 2005, (c) Peter Jipsen http://www.chapman.edu/~jipsen
Modified with TeX conversion for IMG rendering Sept 6, 2006 (c) David Lippman http://www.pierce.ctc.edu/dlippman
Updated to match ver 2.2 Mar 3, 2014Function AMTparseSexpr has a Cognitive Complexity of 71 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTparseSexpr(str) { // parses str and returns [node,tailstr]
let symbol;
let node;
let result;
let i;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AMprocessNodeR has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMprocessNodeR(n, linebreaks) {
let mtch;
let str;
let arr;
let frg;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AMTparseSexpr has 137 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTparseSexpr(str) { // parses str and returns [node,tailstr]
let symbol;
let node;
let result;
let i;Function AMTparseExpr has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTparseExpr(str, rightbracket) {
let symbol;
let node;
let result;
let i;Function AMgetSymbol has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMgetSymbol(str) {
// return maximal initial substring of str that appears in names
// return null if there is none
let k = 0; // new pos
let j = 0; // old pos- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AMTremoveBrackets has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTremoveBrackets(node) {
let st;
if (node.charAt(0)==='{' && node.charAt(node.length-1)==='}') {
let leftchop = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AMgetSymbol has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMgetSymbol(str) {
// return maximal initial substring of str that appears in names
// return null if there is none
let k = 0; // new pos
let j = 0; // old posFunction AMTparseIexpr has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTparseIexpr(str) {
let sym2;
let node;
let result;
str = AMremoveCharsAndBlanks(str, 0);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AMprocessNodeR has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMprocessNodeR(n, linebreaks) {
let mtch;
let str;
let arr;
let frg;Function AMTparseIexpr has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTparseIexpr(str) {
let sym2;
let node;
let result;
str = AMremoveCharsAndBlanks(str, 0);Function AMposition has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMposition(arr, str, n) {
// return position >=n where str appears or would be inserted
// assumes arr is sorted
let i;
if (n===0) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AMparseMath has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMparseMath(str) {
// DLMOD to remove , which editor adds on multiple spaces
str = str.replace(/( |\u00a0| )/g, '');
str = str.replace(/>/g, '>');
str = str.replace(/</g, '<');Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (st==='^' || st==='_' || st==='/' || st==='|' || st===','
|| (symbol.input.length===1 && symbol.input.match(/\w/) && st!=='(')) {
return [`{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}}`, str];
} else {
node = `{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}{${result[0]}}}`;Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((n.nodeType!==8 || linebreaks) &&
n.parentNode.nodeName!=='form' && n.parentNode.nodeName!=='FORM' &&
n.parentNode.nodeName!=='textarea' && n.parentNode.nodeName!=='TEXTAREA' &&
n.parentNode.nodeName!=='pre' && n.parentNode.nodeName!=='PRE') {
str = n.nodeValue;Function AMTremoveBrackets has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMTremoveBrackets(node) {
let st;
if (node.charAt(0)==='{' && node.charAt(node.length-1)==='}') {
let leftchop = 0;
Function AMprocessNode has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMprocessNode(n, linebreaks, spanclassAM) {
let frag;
let st;
if (spanclassAM!=null) {
frag = document.getElementsByTagName('span');- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AMstrarr2docFrag has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMstrarr2docFrag(arr, linebreaks) {
const newFrag=document.createDocumentFragment();
let expr = false;
for (let i=0; i<arr.length; i+=1) {
if (expr) newFrag.appendChild(AMparseMath(arr[i]));- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (mxnestingd===0 && pos.length>0 && matrix) {
for (i=0; i<pos.length-1; i+=1) {
let subarr;
if (i>0) mxout += '\\\\';
if (i===0) {Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (i=1; i<len-1; i+=1) {
if (newFrag.charAt(i)===left) mxnestingd+=1;
if (newFrag.charAt(i)===right) {
mxnestingd-=1;
if (mxnestingd===0 && newFrag.charAt(i+2)===',' && newFrag.charAt(i+3)==='{') {Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (matrix) { newFrag = mxout; }Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (config.AMusedelimiter2) {
arr[i]=arr[i].replace(/AMescape2/g, config.AMdelimiter2).replace(/AMescape1/g, config.AMdelimiter1);
} else {
arr[i]=arr[i].replace(/AMescape1/g, config.AMdelimiter1);
}Function AMparseMath has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AMparseMath(str) {
// DLMOD to remove , which editor adds on multiple spaces
str = str.replace(/( |\u00a0| )/g, '');
str = str.replace(/>/g, '>');
str = str.replace(/</g, '<');- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((integ && k>1) || k>2) {
st = str.slice(0, k-1);
tagst = 'mn';
} else {
k = 2;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`{\\quad\\text{${symbol.input}}\\quad}`, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [symbol.output, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [newFrag, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [node, result[1]];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [node, result[1]];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`\\sqrt{${result[0]}}`, result[1]];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (result2[0]==null) return [`{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}}`, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}}`, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}{${result[0]}}`, result[1]];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}{${result[0]}}}`, result[1]];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [newFrag, result2[1]];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (result[0]==null) return [`{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}}`, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`\\cancel{${result[0]}}`, result[1]];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (result[0]==null) return [`{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}}`, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}}`, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [node, str];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return [`{\\left${symbol.rewriteleftright[0]}${result[0]}\\right${symbol.rewriteleftright[1]}}`, result[1]];Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (subpos[pos[i]].length===1) {
subarr = [newFrag.substr(pos[i]+7, pos[i+1]-pos[i]-15)];
} else {
subarr = [newFrag.substring(pos[i]+7, subpos[pos[i]][1])];
for (let j=2; j<subpos[pos[i]].length; j+=1) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 195.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (subpos[pos[i]].length===1) { // var subarr = newFrag.substr(pos[i]+8,pos[i+1]-pos[i]-16).split(',');
subarr = [newFrag.substr(pos[i]+8, pos[i+1]-pos[i]-16)];
} else {
subarr = [newFrag.substring(pos[i]+8, subpos[pos[i]][1])];
for (let j=2; j<subpos[pos[i]].length; j+=1) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 195.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (typeof symbol.invisible == 'boolean' && symbol.invisible) { node = `{\\left.${result[0]}}`; } else {
node = `{\\left${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}${result[0]}}`;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (typeof symbol.invisible == 'boolean' && symbol.invisible) { node = `{${result[0]}}`; } else {
node = `{${AMTgetTeXsymbol(symbol)}${result[0]}}`;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (st==='\\rbrace}') {
node = `{${node.substr(leftchop)}`;
node = `${node.substr(0, node.length-14)}}`;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (st==='\\right)}' || st==='\\right]}' || st==='\\right.}') {
node = `{${node.substr(leftchop)}`;
node = `${node.substr(0, node.length-8)}}`;
} else if (st==='\\rbrace}') {
node = `{${node.substr(leftchop)}`;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while (st>='0' && st<='9' && k<=str.length) {
st = str.slice(k, k+1);
k+=1;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while (st>='0' && st<='9' && k<=str.length) {
st = str.slice(k, k+1);
k+=1;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (newFrag.charAt(i)===']' || newFrag.charAt(i)===')' || newFrag.charAt(i)==='}') { mxanynestingd-=1; }- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (newFrag.charAt(i)==='[' || newFrag.charAt(i)==='(' || newFrag.charAt(i)==='{') { mxanynestingd+=1; }- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (result[0] == null) { // show box in place of missing argument
result[0] = '{}';
} else result[0] = AMTremoveBrackets(result[0]);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (result[0] == null) { // show box in place of missing argument
result[0] = '{}';
} else result[0] = AMTremoveBrackets(result[0]);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
subarr = [newFrag.substr(pos[i]+7, pos[i+1]-pos[i]-15)];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
subarr = [newFrag.substr(pos[i]+8, pos[i+1]-pos[i]-16)];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76