Sign upLogin

opal/opal

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 355 of 499 total issues

Method coerce_to has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.coerce_to(obj, cls, meth) # :nodoc:
      return obj if obj.kind_of?(cls)
      raise TypeError, "Expected a #{cls} but got a #{obj.class}" unless obj.respond_to? meth
      begin
        ret = obj.__send__(meth)
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/matrix.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method directory? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.directory?(path)
    return false unless exist? path
    result = `executeIOAction(function(){return !!__fs__.lstatSync(path).isDirectory()})`
    unless result
      realpath = realpath(path)
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/nodejs/file.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method directory? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.directory?(path)
    return false unless exist? path
    result = `executeIOAction(function(){return !!Deno.lstatSync(path).isDirectory})`
    unless result
      realpath = realpath(path)
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/deno/file.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method __getobj__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __getobj__ # :nodoc:
      unless defined?(@delegate_dc_obj)
        return yield if block_given?
        __raise__ ::ArgumentError, 'not delegated'
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/delegate.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method summarize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def summarize(*args, &block)
      sum = []
      list.reverse_each do |opt|
        if opt.respond_to?(:summarize) # perhaps OptionParser::Switch
          s = []
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/optparse.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add_banner has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def add_banner(to) # :nodoc:
      unless @short || @long
        s = desc.join
        to << ' [' + s + ']...' unless s.empty?
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/optparse.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method file? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.file?(path)
    return false unless exist? path
    result = `executeIOAction(function(){return !!Deno.lstatSync(path).isFile})`
    unless result
      realpath = realpath(path)
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/deno/file.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method file? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.file?(path)
    return false unless exist? path
    result = `executeIOAction(function(){return !!__fs__.lstatSync(path).isFile()})`
    unless result
      realpath = realpath(path)
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/nodejs/file.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method join has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.join(*paths)
    # by itself, `path.posix.join` normalizes leading // to /.
    # restore the leading / on UNC paths (i.e., paths starting with //).
    paths = paths.map(&:to_s)
    prefix = paths.first&.start_with?('//') ? '/' : ''
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/deno/file.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def parse(arg, argv, &error)
        if !(val = arg) && (argv.empty? || /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
          return nil, block, nil
        end
        opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/optparse.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method rank has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def rank
    # We currently use Bareiss' multistep integer-preserving gaussian elimination
    # (see comments on determinant)
    a = to_a
    last_column = column_count - 1
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/matrix.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method alias_native has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def alias_native(new, old = new, as: nil)
      if old.end_with? '='
        define_method new do |value|
          `#{@native}[#{old[0..-2]}] = #{Native.convert(value)}`
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/native.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(path)
    if Pathname === path
      @path = path.path.to_s
    elsif path.respond_to?(:to_path)
      @path = path.to_path
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/pathname.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method colorize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.colorize(str)
      tokens = tokenize(str)

      tokens.map do |tok|
        case tok
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/opal-replutils.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method define_by_keywords has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def define_by_keywords(options, meth, **opts)
    meth.parameters.each do |type, name|
      case type
      when :key, :keyreq
        op, cl = *(type == :key ? %w"[ ]" : ['', ''])
Severity: Minor
Found in stdlib/optparse/kwargs.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language