Showing 359 of 503 total issues
Method diagonalize
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diagonalize
# This is derived from the Algol procedures tql2, by
# Bowdler, Martin, Reinsch, and Wilkinson, Handbook for
# Auto. Comp., Vol.ii-Linear Algebra, and the corresponding
# Fortran subroutine in EISPACK.
Method mktmpprofile
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mktmpprofile
# for prefs see https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/blob/main/packages/browsers/src/browser-data/firefox.ts
# and https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/blob/main/packages/puppeteer-core/src/node/FirefoxLauncher.ts
profile = Dir.mktmpdir('firefox-opal-profile-')
default_prefs = {
Method step
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def step(n = undefined)
%x{
function coerceStepSize() {
if (n == null) {
n = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_part
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_part(sexp, missing_dynamic_require = @missing_dynamic_require)
if sexp
case sexp.type
when :str
return sexp.children[0]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method >>
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def >>(promise)
@next << promise
if exception?
promise.reject(@delayed[0])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method step
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def step(n = undefined)
%x{
function coerceStepSize() {
if (n == null) {
n = 1;
Method run_firefox_server
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run_firefox_server
raise 'Firefox server can be started only on localhost' if chrome_host != DEFAULT_CHROME_HOST
profile = mktmpprofile
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method def_formatter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.def_formatter(name, format, on_utc: false, utc_tz: nil, tz_format: nil, fractions: false, on: self)
on.define_method name do |fdigits = 0|
case self
when defined?(::DateTime) && ::DateTime
date = on_utc ? new_offset(0) : self
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method split
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def split(pattern = undefined, limit = undefined)
%x{
if (self.length === 0) {
return [];
}
Method []=
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def []=(index, value, extra = undefined)
`$deny_frozen_access(self)`
data = nil
%x{
Method cycle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cycle(n = nil, &block)
unless block_given?
return enum_for(:cycle, n) do
if n.nil?
respond_to?(:size) ? ::Float::INFINITY : nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method js_truthy_optimize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def js_truthy_optimize(sexp)
case sexp.type
when :send
receiver, mid, *args = *sexp
receiver_handler_class = receiver && compiler.handlers[receiver.type]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method gamma
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def gamma(n)
n = Math.float!(n)
%x{
var i, t, x, value, result, twoN, threeN, fourN, fiveN;
Method _racc_evalact
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _racc_evalact(act, arg)
action_table, action_check, _, action_pointer,
_, _, _, _,
_, _, _, shift_n, reduce_n,
_, _, * = arg
Method parse_in_order
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_in_order(argv = default_argv, setter = nil, &nonopt) # :nodoc:
opt, arg, val, rest = nil
nonopt ||= proc { |a| throw :terminate, a }
argv.unshift(arg) if arg = catch(:terminate) do
while arg = argv.shift
Method eval_ruby
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def eval_ruby(code)
builder = Opal::Builder.new
silencer = Silencer.new
code = "#{@incomplete}#{code}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_array
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_array(node)
children = node.children
# Optimize large arrays produced by lexer, but mainly we are interested
# in improving compile times, by reducing the tree for the further
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method complete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete(key, icase = false, pat = nil)
candidates = candidate(key, icase, pat, &method(:each)).sort_by { |k, v, kn| kn.size }
if candidates.size == 1
canon, sw, * = candidates[0]
elsif candidates.size > 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method thrower
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def thrower(type, value = nil)
case type
when :return
thrower_closure = select_closure(DEF, break_after: MODULE | TOP)
last_closure = select_closure(JS_FUNCTION)
Method slice!
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def slice!(index, length = undefined)
`$deny_frozen_access(self)`
result = nil