File js.js
has 2043 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* Disable console output unless DEBUG mode is enabled.
* Add
* 'debug' => true,
* To the definition of $CONFIG in config/config.php to enable debug mode.
Function _generateHTML
has a Cognitive Complexity of 220 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.datepicker._generateHTML = function( inst ) {
var maxDraw, prevText, prev, nextText, next, currentText, gotoDate,
controls, buttonPanel, firstDay, showWeek, dayNames, dayNamesMin,
monthNames, monthNamesShort, beforeShowDay, showOtherMonths,
selectOtherMonths, defaultDate, html, dow, row, group, col, selectedDate,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function initCore
has 267 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function initCore() {
// setup tooltip
$('.section .icon-info').tooltip({placement: 'right'});
/**
Function _generateHTML
has 240 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.datepicker._generateHTML = function( inst ) {
var maxDraw, prevText, prev, nextText, next, currentText, gotoDate,
controls, buttonPanel, firstDay, showWeek, dayNames, dayNamesMin,
monthNames, monthNamesShort, beforeShowDay, showOtherMonths,
selectOtherMonths, defaultDate, html, dow, row, group, col, selectedDate,
Function initCore
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function initCore() {
// setup tooltip
$('.section .icon-info').tooltip({placement: 'right'});
/**
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extend
has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend = jQuery.fn.extend = function() {
var options, name, src, copy, copyIsArray, clone,
target = arguments[0] || {},
i = 1,
length = arguments.length,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function position
has 147 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.position = function( options ) {
if ( !options || !options.of ) {
return _position.apply( this, arguments );
}
OC
has 39 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var OC = {
PERMISSION_CREATE: 4,
PERMISSION_READ: 1,
PERMISSION_UPDATE: 2,
PERMISSION_DELETE: 8,
Function appSettings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
appSettings: function (args) {
if (typeof args === 'undefined' || typeof args.appid === 'undefined') {
throw {name: 'MissingParameter', message: 'The parameter appid is missing'};
}
var props = {scriptName: 'settings.php', cache: true};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function filePath
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
filePath: function (app, type, file) {
var isCore = OC.coreApps.indexOf(app) !== -1,
link = OC.getRootPath();
if (file.substring(file.length - 3) === 'php' && !isCore) {
link += '/index.php/apps/' + app;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function tipsy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.tipsy = function (argument) {
console.warn('Deprecation warning: tipsy is deprecated. Use tooltip instead.');
if (typeof argument === 'object' && argument !== null) {
// tipsy defaults
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _attachments
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.datepicker._attachments = function (input, inst) {
var showOn, buttonText, buttonImage,
appendText = this._get(inst, "appendText"),
isRTL = this._get(inst, "isRTL");
Function _attachments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.datepicker._attachments = function (input, inst) {
var showOn, buttonText, buttonImage,
appendText = this._get(inst, "appendText"),
isRTL = this._get(inst, "isRTL");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function appSettings
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
appSettings: function (args) {
if (typeof args === 'undefined' || typeof args.appid === 'undefined') {
throw {name: 'MissingParameter', message: 'The parameter appid is missing'};
}
var props = {scriptName: 'settings.php', cache: true};
Function tipsy
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.tipsy = function (argument) {
console.warn('Deprecation warning: tipsy is deprecated. Use tooltip instead.');
if (typeof argument === 'object' && argument !== null) {
// tipsy defaults
Function initMouseTrack
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function initMouseTrack() {
var interval = 120; // 2 minutes
if (oc_config.session_lifetime) {
interval = Math.floor(oc_config.session_lifetime / 2);
}
Function parseQueryString
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseQueryString: function (queryString) {
var parts,
pos,
components,
result = {},
Function extend
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend = jQuery.fn.extend = function() {
var options, name, src, copy, copyIsArray, clone,
target = arguments[0] || {},
i = 1,
length = arguments.length,
Function filePath
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
filePath: function (app, type, file) {
var isCore = OC.coreApps.indexOf(app) !== -1,
link = OC.getRootPath();
if (file.substring(file.length - 3) === 'php' && !isCore) {
link += '/index.php/apps/' + app;
Function parseQueryString
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseQueryString: function (queryString) {
var parts,
pos,
components,
result = {},
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function hide
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hide: function ($row, callback) {
var self = this;
var $notification = $('#notification');
if (_.isFunction($row)) {
Function joinPaths
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
joinPaths: function () {
if (arguments.length < 1) {
return '';
}
var path = '';
Function computerFileSize
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
computerFileSize: function (string) {
if (typeof string !== 'string') {
return null;
}
Function dialog_createTitlebar
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.ui.dialog.dialog_createTitlebar = function() {
var uiDialogTitle;
this.uiDialogTitlebar = $( "<div>" );
this._addClass( this.uiDialogTitlebar,
"ui-dialog-titlebar", "ui-widget-header ui-helper-clearfix" );
Function joinPaths
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
joinPaths: function () {
if (arguments.length < 1) {
return '';
}
var path = '';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function showHtml
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
showHtml: function (html, options) {
options = options || {};
_.defaults(options, {
timeout: 0
});
Function getDimensions
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getDimensions( elem ) {
var raw = elem[ 0 ];
if ( raw.nodeType === 9 ) {
return {
width: elem.width(),
Function generateUrl
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
generateUrl: function (url, params, options) {
var defaultOptions = {
escape: true
},
allOptions = options || {};
Function _show
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_show: function (container, dir, leafname, leaflink) {
var self = this;
this._clear(container);
Function jqxhr
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var jqxhr = $.get(OC.filePath(props.appid, '', props.scriptName), function (data) {
popup.html(data).ready(function () {
popup.prepend('<span class="arrow ' + arrowclass + '"></span><h2>' + t('core', 'Settings') + '</h2><a class="close"></a>').show();
popup.find('.close').bind('click', function () {
popup.remove();
Function position
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.position = function( options ) {
if ( !options || !options.of ) {
return _position.apply( this, arguments );
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('hidden') && !$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('disappear')) {
controlsWidth -= $('#app-sidebar').width();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( copyIsArray ) {
copyIsArray = false;
clone = src && jQuery.isArray(src) ? src : [];
} else {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('hidden') && !$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('disappear')) {
controlsWidth -= $('#app-sidebar').width();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ( copy !== undefined ) {
target[ name ] = copy;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
switch ( col ) {
case 0: calender += " ui-datepicker-group-first";
cornerClass = " ui-corner-" + ( isRTL ? "right" : "left" ); break;
case numMonths[ 1 ] - 1: calender += " ui-datepicker-group-last";
cornerClass = " ui-corner-" + ( isRTL ? "left" : "right" ); break;
Function addScript
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addScript: function (app, script, ready) {
var deferred, path = OC.filePath(app, 'js', script + '.js');
if (!OC.addScript.loaded[path]) {
if (ready) {
deferred = $.getScript(path, ready);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function registerXHRForErrorProcessing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
registerXHRForErrorProcessing: function (xhr) {
var loadCallback = function () {
if (xhr.readyState !== 4) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _onPopState
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_onPopState: function (e) {
if (this._cancelPop) {
this._cancelPop = false;
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function humanFileSize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function humanFileSize(size, skipSmallSizes) {
var humanList = ['B', 'KB', 'MB', 'GB', 'TB'];
// Calculate Log with base 1024: size = 1024 ** order
var order = size > 0 ? Math.floor(Math.log(size) / Math.log(1024)) : 0;
// Stay in range of the byte sizes that are defined
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _pushState
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_pushState: function (params, replace) {
var strParams;
if (typeof(params) === 'string') {
strParams = params;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function naturalSortCompare
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
naturalSortCompare: function (a, b) {
var x;
var aa = OC.Util._chunkify(a);
var bb = OC.Util._chunkify(b);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computerFileSize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
computerFileSize: function (string) {
if (typeof string !== 'string') {
return null;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function hide
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hide: function ($row, callback) {
var self = this;
var $notification = $('#notification');
if (_.isFunction($row)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
attach: function (targetName, targetObject, options) {
var plugins = this.getPlugins(targetName);
plugins = this.sortPluginsByPriority(plugins);
for (var i = 0; i < plugins.length; i++) {
var plugin = plugins[i].plugin;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
detach: function (targetName, targetObject, options) {
var plugins = this.getPlugins(targetName);
plugins = this.sortPluginsByPriority(plugins);
for (var i = 0; i < plugins.length; i++) {
var plugin = plugins[i].plugin;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( this._canAdjustMonth( inst, -1, drawYear, drawMonth ) ) {
prev = $( "<a>" )
.attr( {
"class": "ui-datepicker-prev ui-corner-all",
"data-handler": "prev",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( this._canAdjustMonth( inst, +1, drawYear, drawMonth ) ) {
next = $( "<a>" )
.attr( {
"class": "ui-datepicker-next ui-corner-all",
"data-handler": "next",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( options.at[ 0 ] === "right" ) {
basePosition.left += targetWidth;
} else if ( options.at[ 0 ] === "center" ) {
basePosition.left += targetWidth / 2;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( options.my[ 0 ] === "right" ) {
position.left -= elemWidth;
} else if ( options.my[ 0 ] === "center" ) {
position.left -= elemWidth / 2;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( options.at[ 1 ] === "bottom" ) {
basePosition.top += targetHeight;
} else if ( options.at[ 1 ] === "center" ) {
basePosition.top += targetHeight / 2;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( options.my[ 1 ] === "bottom" ) {
position.top -= elemHeight;
} else if ( options.my[ 1 ] === "center" ) {
position.top -= elemHeight / 2;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('hidden') && !$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('disappear')) {
controlsWidth -= $('#app-sidebar').width();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('hidden') && !$('#app-sidebar').hasClass('disappear')) {
controlsWidth -= $('#app-sidebar').width();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
nextText = ( !navigationAsDateFormat ? nextText : this.formatDate( nextText,
this._daylightSavingAdjust( new Date( drawYear, drawMonth + stepMonths, 1 ) ),
this._getFormatConfig( inst ) ) );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
prevText = ( !navigationAsDateFormat ? prevText : this.formatDate( prevText,
this._daylightSavingAdjust( new Date( drawYear, drawMonth - stepMonths, 1 ) ),
this._getFormatConfig( inst ) ) );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
result.push(encodeURIComponent(parts[i]));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76