passport-next/passport

View on GitHub
lib/middleware/authenticate.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
5 days
Test Coverage

Function authenticate has a Cognitive Complexity of 112 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module.exports = function authenticate(passport, name, options, callback) {
  if (typeof options === 'function') {
    callback = options;
    options = {};
  }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js - About 2 days to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function authenticate has 171 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module.exports = function authenticate(passport, name, options, callback) {
  if (typeof options === 'function') {
    callback = options;
    options = {};
  }
Severity: Major
Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js - About 6 hrs to fix

    Function authenticate has 159 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      return function authenticate(req, res, next) {
        // accumulator for failures from each strategy in the chain
        const failures = [];
    
        // eslint-disable-next-line jsdoc/require-jsdoc
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js - About 6 hrs to fix

      Function attempt has 95 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          (function attempt(i) {
            let strategy;
            const layer = name[i];
            // If no more strategies exist in the chain, authentication has failed.
            if (!layer) { return allFailed(); }
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js - About 3 hrs to fix

        Function success has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              strategy.success = function success(user, info) {
                if (callback) {
                  return callback(null, user, info);
                }
        
        
        Severity: Major
        Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js - About 2 hrs to fix

          Function allFailed has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              function allFailed() {
                if (callback) {
                  if (!multi) {
                    return callback(null, false, failures[0].challenge, failures[0].status);
                  }
          Severity: Major
          Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js - About 2 hrs to fix

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                      if (typeof msg === 'string') {
                        req.session.messages = req.session.messages || [];
                        req.session.messages.push(msg);
                      }
            Severity: Major
            Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            lib/middleware/authenticate.js on lines 145..148

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 60.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    if (typeof msg === 'string') {
                      req.session.messages = req.session.messages || [];
                      req.session.messages.push(msg);
                    }
            Severity: Major
            Found in lib/middleware/authenticate.js and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            lib/middleware/authenticate.js on lines 248..251

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 60.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status