File jquery-1.7.2.js
has 6474 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.7.2
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Copyright 2011, John Resig
Function jQuery
has 614 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var jQuery = (function() {
// Define a local copy of jQuery
var jQuery = function( selector, context ) {
// The jQuery object is actually just the init constructor 'enhanced'
Function ajax
has 242 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
Function support
has 172 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.support = (function() {
var support,
all,
a,
Function Callbacks
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( flags ) {
// Convert flags from String-formatted to Object-formatted
// (we check in cache first)
flags = flags ? ( flagsCache[ flags ] || createFlags( flags ) ) : {};
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && original.clientX != null ) {
eventDoc = event.target.ownerDocument || document;
doc = eventDoc.documentElement;
body = eventDoc.body;
Function Sizzle
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Sizzle = function( selector, context, results, seed ) {
results = results || [];
context = context || document;
var origContext = context;
Function clean
has 95 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clean: function( elems, context, fragment, scripts ) {
var checkScriptType, script, j,
ret = [];
context = context || document;
Function animate
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
animate: function( prop, speed, easing, callback ) {
var optall = jQuery.speed( speed, easing, callback );
if ( jQuery.isEmptyObject( prop ) ) {
return this.each( optall.complete, [ false ] );
Function trigger
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
// Don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem && (elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8) ) {
return;
}
Function send
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
// Get a new xhr
var xhr = s.xhr(),
handle,
Function doAnimation
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doAnimation() {
// XXX 'this' does not always have a nodeName when running the
// test suite
if ( optall.queue === false ) {
Function Deferred
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Deferred: function( func ) {
var doneList = jQuery.Callbacks( "once memory" ),
failList = jQuery.Callbacks( "once memory" ),
progressList = jQuery.Callbacks( "memory" ),
state = "pending",
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( "getBoundingClientRect" in document.documentElement ) {
getOffset = function( elem, doc, docElem, box ) {
try {
box = elem.getBoundingClientRect();
} catch(e) {}
Function add
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
var elemData, eventHandle, events,
t, tns, type, namespaces, handleObj,
handleObjIn, quick, handlers, special;
Function done
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done( status, nativeStatusText, responses, headers ) {
// Called once
if ( state === 2 ) {
return;
Function filter
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Sizzle.filter = function( expr, set, inplace, not ) {
var match, anyFound,
type, found, item, filter, left,
i, pass,
old = expr,
Function dispatch
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dispatch: function( event ) {
// Make a writable jQuery.Event from the native event object
event = jQuery.event.fix( event || window.event );
Function init
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function( selector, context, rootjQuery ) {
var match, elem, ret, doc;
// Handle $(""), $(null), or $(undefined)
if ( !selector ) {
Function domManip
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domManip: function( args, table, callback ) {
var results, first, fragment, parent,
value = args[0],
scripts = [];
Function ajaxConvert
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxConvert( s, response ) {
// Apply the dataFilter if provided
if ( s.dataFilter ) {
response = s.dataFilter( response, s.dataType );
Function data
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function( elem, name, data, pvt /* Internal Use Only */ ) {
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function removeData
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
removeData: function( elem, name, pvt /* Internal Use Only */ ) {
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function remove
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {
var elemData = jQuery.hasData( elem ) && jQuery._data( elem ),
t, tns, type, origType, namespaces, origCount,
j, events, special, handle, eventType, handleObj;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( args.length === 1 && typeof first === "string" && first.length < 512 && doc === document &&
first.charAt(0) === "<" && !rnocache.test( first ) &&
(jQuery.support.checkClone || !rchecked.test( first )) &&
(jQuery.support.html5Clone || !rnoshimcache.test( first )) ) {
Function step
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
step: function( gotoEnd ) {
var p, n, complete,
t = fxNow || createFxNow(),
done = true,
elem = this.elem,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( ( mappedTypes || origType === handleObj.origType ) &&
( !handler || handler.guid === handleObj.guid ) &&
( !namespaces || namespaces.test( handleObj.namespace ) ) &&
( !selector || selector === handleObj.selector || selector === "**" && handleObj.selector ) ) {
eventType.splice( j--, 1 );
Function data
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function( key, value ) {
var parts, part, attr, name, l,
elem = this[0],
i = 0,
data = null;
Function CHILD
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
CHILD: function( elem, match ) {
var first, last,
doneName, parent, cache,
count, diff,
type = match[1],
Function ajaxHandleResponses
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxHandleResponses( s, jqXHR, responses ) {
var contents = s.contents,
dataTypes = s.dataTypes,
responseFields = s.responseFields,
Function stop
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
stop: function( type, clearQueue, gotoEnd ) {
if ( typeof type !== "string" ) {
gotoEnd = clearQueue;
clearQueue = type;
type = undefined;
Function load
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
load: function( url, params, callback ) {
if ( typeof url !== "string" && _load ) {
return _load.apply( this, arguments );
// Don't do a request if no elements are being requested
Function on
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {
var origFn, type;
// Types can be a map of types/handlers
if ( typeof types === "object" ) {
Function val
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
val: function( value ) {
var hooks, ret, isFunction,
elem = this[0];
if ( !arguments.length ) {
Function extend
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend = jQuery.fn.extend = function() {
var options, name, src, copy, copyIsArray, clone,
target = arguments[0] || {},
i = 1,
length = arguments.length,
Function when
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
when: function( firstParam ) {
var args = sliceDeferred.call( arguments, 0 ),
i = 0,
length = args.length,
pValues = new Array( length ),
Function getWidthOrHeight
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getWidthOrHeight( elem, name, extra ) {
// Start with offset property
var val = name === "width" ? elem.offsetWidth : elem.offsetHeight,
i = name === "width" ? 1 : 0,
Function attr
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
attr: function( elem, name, value, pass ) {
var ret, hooks, notxml,
nType = elem.nodeType;
// don't get/set attributes on text, comment and attribute nodes
Function access
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
access: function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, pass ) {
var exec,
bulk = key == null,
i = 0,
length = elems.length;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( match[1] === "nth" ) {
if ( !match[2] ) {
Sizzle.error( match[0] );
}
Function each
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
each: function( object, callback, args ) {
var name, i = 0,
length = object.length,
isObj = length === undefined || jQuery.isFunction( object );
Function closest
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
closest: function( selectors, context ) {
var ret = [], i, l, cur = this[0];
// Array (deprecated as of jQuery 1.7)
if ( jQuery.isArray( selectors ) ) {
Function setOffset
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setOffset: function( elem, options, i ) {
var position = jQuery.css( elem, "position" );
// set position first, in-case top/left are set even on static elem
if ( position === "static" ) {
Function ATTR
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ATTR: function( elem, match ) {
var name = match[1],
result = Sizzle.attr ?
Sizzle.attr( elem, name ) :
Expr.attrHandle[ name ] ?
Function cleanData
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
cleanData: function( elems ) {
var data, id,
cache = jQuery.cache,
special = jQuery.event.special,
deleteExpando = jQuery.support.deleteExpando;
Function dirCheck
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dirCheck( dir, cur, doneName, checkSet, nodeCheck, isXML ) {
for ( var i = 0, l = checkSet.length; i < l; i++ ) {
var elem = checkSet[i];
if ( elem ) {
Function cloneFixAttributes
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function cloneFixAttributes( src, dest ) {
var nodeName;
// We do not need to do anything for non-Elements
if ( dest.nodeType !== 1 ) {
Function promise
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
promise: function( type, object ) {
if ( typeof type !== "string" ) {
object = type;
type = undefined;
}
Function style
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
style: function( elem, name, value, extra ) {
// Don't set styles on text and comment nodes
if ( !elem || elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 || !elem.style ) {
return;
}
Function clone
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clone: function( elem, dataAndEvents, deepDataAndEvents ) {
var srcElements,
destElements,
i,
// IE<=8 does not properly clone detached, unknown element nodes
Function html
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
html: function( value ) {
return jQuery.access( this, function( value ) {
var elem = this[0] || {},
i = 0,
l = this.length;
Function find
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
find: function( selector ) {
var self = this,
i, l;
if ( typeof selector !== "string" ) {
Function show
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
show: function( speed, easing, callback ) {
var elem, display;
if ( speed || speed === 0 ) {
return this.animate( genFx("show", 3), speed, easing, callback );
Function addClass
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addClass: function( value ) {
var classNames, i, l, elem,
setClass, c, cl;
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
Function setup
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup: function() {
if ( rformElems.test( this.nodeName ) ) {
// IE doesn't fire change on a check/radio until blur; trigger it on click
// after a propertychange. Eat the blur-change in special.change.handle.
Function fire
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fire = function( context, args ) {
args = args || [];
memory = !flags.memory || [ context, args ];
fired = true;
firing = true;
Function >
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
">": function( checkSet, part ) {
var elem,
isPartStr = typeof part === "string",
i = 0,
l = checkSet.length;
Function buildFragment
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.buildFragment = function( args, nodes, scripts ) {
var fragment, cacheable, cacheresults, doc,
first = args[ 0 ];
// nodes may contain either an explicit document object,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( run_all || (!event.namespace && !handleObj.namespace) || event.namespace_re && event.namespace_re.test( handleObj.namespace ) ) {
event.data = handleObj.data;
event.handleObj = handleObj;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( jQuery.expr && jQuery.expr.filters ) {
jQuery.expr.filters.hidden = function( elem ) {
var width = elem.offsetWidth,
height = elem.offsetHeight;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( typeof value === "string" && !rnoInnerhtml.test( value ) &&
( jQuery.support.leadingWhitespace || !rleadingWhitespace.test( value ) ) &&
!wrapMap[ ( rtagName.exec( value ) || ["", ""] )[1].toLowerCase() ] ) {
value = value.replace( rxhtmlTag, "<$1></$2>" );
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( (!id || !cache[id] || (!isEvents && !pvt && !cache[id].data)) && getByName && data === undefined ) {
return;
}
Function access
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
access: function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, pass ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( elem && elem.parentNode ) {
// Handle the case where IE and Opera return items
// by name instead of ID
if ( elem.id === match[3] ) {
return makeArray( [ elem ], extra );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !relativeHierarchySelector || hasParent ) {
return makeArray( context.querySelectorAll( "[id='" + nid + "'] " + query ), extra );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( xml && xml.documentElement /* #4958 */ ) {
responses.xml = xml;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( c = 0, cl = classNames.length; c < cl; c++ ) {
className = className.replace(" " + classNames[ c ] + " ", " ");
}
Function CLASS
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
CLASS: function( match, curLoop, inplace, result, not, isXML ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( firing ) {
if ( i <= firingLength ) {
firingLength--;
if ( i <= firingIndex ) {
firingIndex--;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !old ) {
context.setAttribute( "id", nid );
} else {
nid = nid.replace( /'/g, "\\$&" );
}
Function dirCheck
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dirCheck( dir, cur, doneName, checkSet, nodeCheck, isXML ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( copyIsArray ) {
copyIsArray = false;
clone = src && jQuery.isArray(src) ? src : [];
} else {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( i = 0; (item = curLoop[i]) != null; i++ ) {
if ( item ) {
found = filter( item, match, i, curLoop );
pass = not ^ found;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( special[ type ] ) {
jQuery.event.remove( elem, type );
// This is a shortcut to avoid jQuery.event.remove's overhead
} else {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !xhrCallbacks ) {
xhrCallbacks = {};
jQuery( window ).unload( xhrOnUnloadAbort );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( selMatch[ sel ] === undefined ) {
selMatch[ sel ] = (
handleObj.quick ? quickIs( cur, handleObj.quick ) : jqcur.is( sel )
);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !old ) {
oldContext.removeAttribute( "id" );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( typeof cur !== "string" ) {
if ( elem === cur ) {
match = true;
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( elem.id !== match[2] ) {
return rootjQuery.find( selector );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( j = tbody.length - 1; j >= 0 ; --j ) {
if ( jQuery.nodeName( tbody[ j ], "tbody" ) && !tbody[ j ].childNodes.length ) {
tbody[ j ].parentNode.removeChild( tbody[ j ] );
}
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ( copy !== undefined ) {
target[ name ] = copy;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( c = 0, cl = classNames.length; c < cl; c++ ) {
if ( !~setClass.indexOf( " " + classNames[ c ] + " " ) ) {
setClass += classNames[ c ] + " ";
}
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !isXML ) {
elem[ expando ] = doneName;
elem.sizset = i;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !status && s.isLocal && !s.crossDomain ) {
status = responses.text ? 200 : 404;
// IE - #1450: sometimes returns 1223 when it should be 204
} else if ( status === 1223 ) {
status = 204;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( selMatch[ sel ] ) {
matches.push( handleObj );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( relativeHierarchySelector && hasParent ) {
context = context.parentNode;
}
Function dirNodeCheck
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dirNodeCheck( dir, cur, doneName, checkSet, nodeCheck, isXML ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( flags.unique ) {
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( name.indexOf( "data-" ) === 0 ) {
name = jQuery.camelCase( name.substring(5) );
dataAttr( elem, name, data[ name ] );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ret[r] === ret[n] ) {
ret.splice(n--, 1);
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( name in thisCache ) {
name = [ name ];
} else {
name = name.split( " " );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ret === false ) {
event.preventDefault();
event.stopPropagation();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( safeChildNodes.length > 0 ) {
remove = safeChildNodes[ safeChildNodes.length - 1 ];
if ( remove && remove.parentNode ) {
remove.parentNode.removeChild( remove );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( xhrOnUnloadAbort ) {
delete xhrCallbacks[ handle ];
}
Function inspectPrefiltersOrTransports
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function inspectPrefiltersOrTransports( structure, options, originalOptions, jqXHR,
dataType /* internal */, inspected /* internal */ ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !inplace ) {
curLoop = result;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !anyFound ) {
return [];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( tmp[ 0 ] === prev || tmp[ 0 ] === "*" ) {
conv2 = converters[ tmp[1] + " " + current ];
if ( conv2 ) {
conv1 = converters[ conv1 ];
if ( conv1 === true ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( xhr.readyState !== 4 ) {
xhr.abort();
}
Function ATTR
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ATTR: function( match, curLoop, inplace, result, not, isXML ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( jQuery.isPlainObject( context ) ) {
selector = [ document.createElement( ret[1] ) ];
jQuery.fn.attr.call( selector, context, true );
} else {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !match ) {
anyFound = found = true;
} else if ( match === true ) {
continue;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( ontype && elem[ type ] && ((type !== "focus" && type !== "blur") || event.target.offsetWidth !== 0) && !jQuery.isWindow( elem ) ) {
// Don't re-trigger an onFOO event when we call its FOO() method
old = elem[ ontype ];
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( !seed && parts.length > 1 && context.nodeType === 9 && !contextXML &&
Expr.match.ID.test(parts[0]) && !Expr.match.ID.test(parts[parts.length - 1]) ) {
ret = Sizzle.find( parts.shift(), context, contextXML );
context = ret.expr ?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( !jQuery.support.opacity ) {
jQuery.cssHooks.opacity = {
get: function( elem, computed ) {
// IE uses filters for opacity
return ropacity.test( (computed && elem.currentStyle ? elem.currentStyle.filter : elem.style.filter) || "" ) ?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( s.crossDomain == null ) {
parts = rurl.exec( s.url.toLowerCase() );
s.crossDomain = !!( parts &&
( parts[ 1 ] != ajaxLocParts[ 1 ] || parts[ 2 ] != ajaxLocParts[ 2 ] ||
( parts[ 3 ] || ( parts[ 1 ] === "http:" ? 80 : 443 ) ) !=
Function add
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
Function PSEUDO
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
PSEUDO: function( match, curLoop, inplace, result, not ) {
Function remove
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {
Function on
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.constructor( context ).find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return event.result;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return diff === 0;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ( context || rootjQuery ).find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return rootjQuery.find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return value;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret === null ?
undefined :
ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return jQuery.makeArray( selector, this );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return siblingCheck( ap[i], bp[i] );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return makeArray( context.querySelectorAll( "[id='" + nid + "'] " + query ), extra );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return elem[ name ];
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return makeArray( [], extra );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return 1;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ( diff % first === 0 && diff / first >= 0 );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return i === al ?
siblingCheck( a, bp[i], -1 ) :
siblingCheck( ap[i], b, 1 );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return makeArray( context.querySelectorAll(query), extra );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return oldSizzle(query, context, extra, seed);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return rootjQuery.ready( selector );
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"~": function( checkSet, part, isXML ) {
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"": function(checkSet, part, isXML){
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageY = original.clientY + ( doc && doc.scrollTop || body && body.scrollTop || 0 ) - ( doc && doc.clientTop || body && body.clientTop || 0 );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageX = original.clientX + ( doc && doc.scrollLeft || body && body.scrollLeft || 0 ) - ( doc && doc.clientLeft || body && body.clientLeft || 0 );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).removeClass( value.call(this, j, this.className) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
return this.each(function( j ) {
jQuery( this ).addClass( value.call(this, j, this.className) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
reset: function( elem ) {
var name = elem.nodeName.toLowerCase();
return (name === "input" || name === "button") && "reset" === elem.type;
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
submit: function( elem ) {
var name = elem.nodeName.toLowerCase();
return (name === "input" || name === "button") && "submit" === elem.type;
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapAll( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapInner( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( key in elems ) {
value = callback( elems[ key ], key, arg );
if ( value != null ) {
ret[ ret.length ] = value;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( ; i < length; i++ ) {
value = callback( elems[ i ], i, arg );
if ( value != null ) {
ret[ ret.length ] = value;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76