Showing 155 of 899 total issues
Function xpdf
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xpdf(filename=None, paper=(14, 11), crop=False, png=False, prog=False, debug=False, pt='10pt', pdfprog='pdflatex'):
Function __init__
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, __u, __coords, *, ga, norm=False, name=None, root='e', debug=False):
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if expr.exp.is_Rational and abs(expr.exp.p) == 1 and expr.exp.q != 1:
#base = self._print(expr.base)
expq = expr.exp.q
if expq == 2:
Function collect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect(self, deep=False) -> 'Mv':
"""
group coeffients of blades of multivector
so there is only one coefficient per grade
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _latex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _latex(self, print_obj):
parts = []
for base in self.Ga.basis: # base is a basis symbol
if self.versor:
b = mv.Mv(base, ga=self.Ga) # b is the corresponding basis vector
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _eval_derivative_n_times_terms
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _eval_derivative_n_times_terms(terms, x, n):
for i in range(n):
new_terms = []
for k, term in enumerate(terms):
dc = _basic_diff(term[0], x)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function is_blade
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def is_blade(self) -> bool:
"""
True is self is blade, otherwise False
sets self.blade_flg and returns value
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if x != S.Zero:
dA += reduce(operator.mul, c, x)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for l in ga.n_range:
s += dxdu[k][i] * dxdu[l][j] * g_base[k, l].subs(sub_pairs)
g[i, j] = trigsimp(s)
Function _sympystr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _sympystr(self, print_obj):
if self.versor: # ## GSG: changed `self.spinor` to `self.versor` ###
return 'R = ' + print_obj._print(self.V)
else:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if str_sdop[0] == '-' and not isinstance(sdop.terms[0][0], Add):
if self.cmpflg:
s += str_sdop + str_base
else:
s += '-' + str_base + ' ' + str_sdop[1:]
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for i in range(len(g)):
m[i, i] = g[i]
self.g = m
Function __call__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __call__(self, *args):
"""
Evaluate the multilinear function for the given vector arguments.
Note that a sympy scalar is returned, *not* a multilinear function.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __mul__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __mul__(self, A):
if isinstance(A, dop._BaseDop):
return NotImplemented
if not isinstance(A, Mv):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _arithmetic_op
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _arithmetic_op(self, A, op, name: str):
""" Common implementation for + and - """
if isinstance(A, dop._BaseDop):
return NotImplemented
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if index in terms:
c_tmp, base, g_keys = terms[index]
terms[index] = (c_tmp + c, base, g_keys)
else:
terms[index] = (c, base, grade_keys[base])
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if self.cmpflg:
s += str_sdop + '*' + str_base
else:
s += str_base + '*' + str_sdop
s += ' + '
Function connection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def connection(self, rbase, key_base, mode, left):
"""
Compute required multivector connections of the form
(Einstein summation convention) :math:`e^{j}*(D_{j}e_{i_{1}...i_{r}})`
and :math:`(D_{j}e_{i_{1}...i_{r}})*e^{j}` where :math:`*` could be
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if '_' in name or '^' in name:
name = r'\left ( ' + name + r'\right )^{' + exp + '}'
else:
name += '^{' + exp + '}'
Function Mul
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def Mul(A: 'Mv', B: 'Mv', op: str) -> 'Mv':
"""
Function for all types of geometric multiplications called by
overloaded operators for ``*``, ``^``, ``|``, ``<``, and ``>``.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"