Showing 50 of 135 total issues
Function jt
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
}}function jt(n,t,r,e,u){if(!le(n))return n;var o=Rr(t.length)&&(Uo(t)||ve(t));if(!o){var i=Ko(t);iu.apply(i,Gu(t))}return Vn(i||t,function(a,f){if(i&&(f=a,a=t[f]),h(a)){e||(e=[]),u||(u=[]);n:{for(var c=f,l=e,s=u,p=l.length,_=t[c];p--;)if(l[p]==_){n[c]=s[p];break n}var p=n[c],v=r?r(p,_,c,n,t):w,g=v===w;g&&(v=_,Rr(_.length)&&(Uo(_)||ve(_))?v=Uo(p)?p:Zu(p)?Kn(p):[]:No(_)||ae(_)?v=ae(p)?ge(p):No(p)?p:{}:g=false),l.push(_),s.push(v),g?n[c]=jt(v,_,r,l,s):(v===v?v!==p:p===p)&&(n[c]=v)}}else c=n[f],l=r?r(c,a,f,n,t):w,
Function wt
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
o||(o=[]),c=u.length;c--;)if(u[c]==n){n=o[c]==t;break n}u.push(n),o.push(t),n=(a?vr:yr)(n,t,i,r,e,u,o),u.pop(),o.pop()}else n=false}else n=gr(n,t,c)}return n}function wt(n,t,r,e,u){for(var o=-1,i=t.length,a=!u;++o<i;)if(a&&e[o]?r[o]!==n[t[o]]:!(t[o]in n))return false;for(o=-1;++o<i;){var f=t[o],c=n[f],l=r[o];if(a&&e[o]?f=c!==w||f in n:(f=u?u(c,l,f):w,f===w&&(f=mt(l,c,u,true))),!f)return false}return true}function bt(n,t){var r=-1,e=Zu(n),u=Rr(e)?Te(e):[];return Bu(n,function(n,e,o){u[++r]=t(n,e,o)}),u}function xt(n){
Function generator
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
modifier.generator = function(prevGenerator, name, args, ctx) {
var mod = all[name],
fn;
args = args || [];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
}function at(n,t,r,e,u,o,i){var a;if(r&&(a=u?r(n,e,u):r(n)),a!==w)return a;if(!le(n))return n;if(e=Uo(n)){if(a=br(n),!t)return Kn(n,a)}else{var f=Je.call(n),c=f==K;if(f!=Y&&f!=B&&(!c||u))return Nn[f]?Ar(n,f,t):u?n:{};if(Gn(n))return u?n:{};if(a=xr(c?{}:n),!t)return Lu(a,n)}for(o||(o=[]),i||(i=[]),u=o.length;u--;)if(o[u]==n)return i[u];return o.push(n),i.push(a),(e?Vn:vt)(n,function(e,u){a[u]=at(e,t,r,u,n,o,i)}),a}function ft(n,t,r){if(typeof n!="function")throw new ze(L);return lu(function(){n.apply(w,r);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
for(;u--;)if(n[u]===t)return u;return-1},Ln.max=ui,Ln.min=oi,Ln.noConflict=function(){return _._=Xe,this},Ln.noop=Se,Ln.now=wo,Ln.pad=function(n,t,r){n=u(n),t=+t;var e=n.length;return e<t&&du(t)?(e=(t-e)/2,t=eu(e),e=tu(e),r=sr("",e,r),r.slice(0,t)+n+r):n},Ln.padLeft=Xo,Ln.padRight=Ho,Ln.parseInt=xe,Ln.random=function(n,t,r){r&&Er(n,t,r)&&(t=r=null);var e=null==n,u=null==t;return null==r&&(u&&typeof n=="boolean"?(r=n,n=1):typeof t=="boolean"&&(r=t,u=true)),e&&u&&(t=1,u=false),n=+n||0,u?(t=n,n=0):t=+t||0,
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
}function at(n,t,r,e,u,o,i){var a;if(r&&(a=u?r(n,e,u):r(n)),a!==w)return a;if(!le(n))return n;if(e=Uo(n)){if(a=br(n),!t)return Kn(n,a)}else{var f=Je.call(n),c=f==K;if(f!=Y&&f!=B&&(!c||u))return Nn[f]?Ar(n,f,t):u?n:{};if(Gn(n))return u?n:{};if(a=xr(c?{}:n),!t)return Lu(a,n)}for(o||(o=[]),i||(i=[]),u=o.length;u--;)if(o[u]==n)return i[u];return o.push(n),i.push(a),(e?Vn:vt)(n,function(e,u){a[u]=at(e,t,r,u,n,o,i)}),a}function ft(n,t,r){if(typeof n!="function")throw new ze(L);return lu(function(){n.apply(w,r);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
}function at(n,t,r,e,u,o,i){var a;if(r&&(a=u?r(n,e,u):r(n)),a!==w)return a;if(!le(n))return n;if(e=Uo(n)){if(a=br(n),!t)return Kn(n,a)}else{var f=Je.call(n),c=f==K;if(f!=Y&&f!=B&&(!c||u))return Nn[f]?Ar(n,f,t):u?n:{};if(Gn(n))return u?n:{};if(a=xr(c?{}:n),!t)return Lu(a,n)}for(o||(o=[]),i||(i=[]),u=o.length;u--;)if(o[u]==n)return i[u];return o.push(n),i.push(a),(e?Vn:vt)(n,function(e,u){a[u]=at(e,t,r,u,n,o,i)}),a}function ft(n,t,r){if(typeof n!="function")throw new ze(L);return lu(function(){n.apply(w,r);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
}function at(n,t,r,e,u,o,i){var a;if(r&&(a=u?r(n,e,u):r(n)),a!==w)return a;if(!le(n))return n;if(e=Uo(n)){if(a=br(n),!t)return Kn(n,a)}else{var f=Je.call(n),c=f==K;if(f!=Y&&f!=B&&(!c||u))return Nn[f]?Ar(n,f,t):u?n:{};if(Gn(n))return u?n:{};if(a=xr(c?{}:n),!t)return Lu(a,n)}for(o||(o=[]),i||(i=[]),u=o.length;u--;)if(o[u]==n)return i[u];return o.push(n),i.push(a),(e?Vn:vt)(n,function(e,u){a[u]=at(e,t,r,u,n,o,i)}),a}function ft(n,t,r){if(typeof n!="function")throw new ze(L);return lu(function(){n.apply(w,r);
Function isParentOf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
KVPair.prototype.isParentOf = function(pair) {
var node = pair.node;
if (this.hasChildPairs) {
while (node) {
if (node === this.value) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _callConfig
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _callConfig(caller) {
var series = caller.series.slice(1); // Shift '@Config'
var ser = series[0];
var value = allConfig;
if (!ser || ser.args || !value.hasOwnProperty(ser.name)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"