Showing 11 of 83 total issues
Function friendlyClassNames
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function friendlyClassNames({ StyleContainer, Component, element, newProps, styles, config }) {
// Only transform if not already transformed and a className exists
if (!newProps._hasFriendlyClassNames && newProps.className) {
newProps.className = newProps.className.split(' ').reduce((className, cls) => {
cls = cls.trim()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function resolveStyles
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function resolveStyles(Component, element, config) {
if (element && element.props) {
// early return if element itself is a Look component
// it will be resolved anyways
if (isLookEnhanced(element)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function resolveStyles
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function resolveStyles(Component, element, config) {
if (element && element.props) {
// early return if element itself is a Look component
// it will be resolved anyways
if (isLookEnhanced(element)) {
Function className
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
newProps.className = newProps.className.split(' ').reduce((className, cls) => {
cls = cls.trim()
// If the className has already been resolved
// just use the former new className
if (classMapping.has(cls)) {
Function resolveStyles
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function resolveStyles(Component, element, config) {
if (element && element.props) {
// early return if element itself is a Look component
// it will be resolved anyways
if (isLookEnhanced(element)) {
Function resolveChildren
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function resolveChildren(Component, newProps, config) {
if (newProps.children) {
const { children } = newProps
// directly return primitive children
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extractDynamicStyles
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function extractDynamicStyles(styles) {
// early return stateful selectors
if (_.isFunction(styles)) {
return { _statefulSelector: styles }
}
Function resolvePlugins
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function resolvePlugins(pluginInterface, forceModePossible = false) {
let { styles, config } = pluginInterface
// Triggers plugin resolving
// Uses the exact plugin lineup defined within Config
Function resolveStyles
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function resolveStyles(Component, element, config) {
if (element && element.props) {
// early return if element itself is a Look component
// it will be resolved anyways
if (isLookEnhanced(element)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getResolvedStyle
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function getResolvedStyle(element, Component, config, mediaConfig, pseudoClass) {
Function renderStaticStyles
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function renderStaticStyles(styles, scope) {
// Extracts dynamic parts remaining only static styles
const dynamicStyles = extractDynamicStyles(styles)
// Determines the base styles used to generate the className
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"