Showing 91 of 105 total issues
Method as_json
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def as_json(options = nil) #:nodoc:
# create a subset of the hash by applying :only or :except
subset = if options
if attrs = options[:only]
slice(*Array(attrs))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method in_groups
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def in_groups(number, fill_with = nil)
# size.div number gives minor group size;
# size % number gives how many objects need extra accommodation;
# each group hold either division or division + 1 items.
division = size.div number
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mattr_reader
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mattr_reader(*syms)
options = syms.extract_options!
syms.each do |sym|
raise NameError.new("invalid attribute name: #{sym}") unless sym =~ /\A[_A-Za-z]\w*\z/
class_eval(<<-EOS, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_query(namespace = nil)
collect do |key, value|
unless (value.is_a?(Hash) || value.is_a?(Array)) && value.empty?
value.to_query(namespace ? "#{namespace}[#{key}]" : key)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mattr_writer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mattr_writer(*syms)
options = syms.extract_options!
syms.each do |sym|
raise NameError.new("invalid attribute name: #{sym}") unless sym =~ /\A[_A-Za-z]\w*\z/
class_eval(<<-EOS, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handler_for_rescue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handler_for_rescue(exception)
# We go from right to left because pairs are pushed onto rescue_handlers
# as rescue_from declarations are found.
_, rescuer = self.class.rescue_handlers.reverse.detect do |klass_name, handler|
# The purpose of allowing strings in rescue_from is to support the
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collapse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collapse(element, depth)
hash = get_attributes(element)
child_nodes = element.child_nodes
if child_nodes.length > 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xml(options = {})
require 'core_ext/builder' unless defined?(Builder)
options = options.dup
options[:indent] ||= 2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method civil_from_format
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.civil_from_format(utc_or_local, year, month=1, day=1, hour=0, min=0, sec=0)
Method safe_constantize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def safe_constantize(camel_cased_word)
constantize(camel_cased_word)
rescue NameError => e
raise if e.name && !(camel_cased_word.to_s.split("::").include?(e.name.to_s) ||
e.name.to_s == camel_cased_word.to_s)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method +
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def +(other)
if duration_of_variable_length?(other)
method_missing(:+, other)
else
result = utc.acts_like?(:date) ? utc.since(other) : utc + other rescue utc.since(other)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tidy_bytes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tidy_bytes(string, force = false)
return string if string.empty?
return recode_windows1252_chars(string) if force
# We can't transcode to the same format, so we choose a nearly-identical encoding.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sum
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sum(sign, time = ::Time.current) #:nodoc:
parts.inject(time) do |t,(type,number)|
if t.acts_like?(:time) || t.acts_like?(:date)
if type == :seconds
t.since(sign * number)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method append_features
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def append_features(base)
if base.instance_variable_defined?(:@_dependencies)
base.instance_variable_get(:@_dependencies) << self
return false
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_hash(hash={})
node_hash = {}
# Insert node hash into parent hash correctly.
case hash[name]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method deprecated_false_terminator
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deprecated_false_terminator # :nodoc:
Proc.new do |target, result_lambda|
terminate = true
catch(:abort) do
result = result_lambda.call if result_lambda.is_a?(Proc)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method wrap_with_time_zone
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def wrap_with_time_zone(time)
if time.acts_like?(:time)
periods = time_zone.periods_for_local(time)
self.class.new(nil, time_zone, time, periods.include?(period) ? period : nil)
elsif time.is_a?(Range)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_hash(hash={})
node_hash = {}
# Insert node hash into parent hash correctly.
case hash[name]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rescue_from
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rescue_from(*klasses, &block)
options = klasses.extract_options!
unless options.has_key?(:with)
if block_given?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(name, filter, kind, options, chain_config)