Showing 34 of 34 total issues
Class MessageExpectation
has 58 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
class MessageExpectation
# @!group Configuring Responses
# @overload and_return(value)
# @overload and_return(first_value, second_value)
Class ErrorGenerator
has 48 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
class ErrorGenerator
attr_writer :opts
def initialize(target=nil)
@target = target
File message_expectation.rb
has 441 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
RSpec::Support.require_rspec_support 'mutex'
module RSpec
module Mocks
# A message expectation that only allows concrete return values to be set
Class Proxy
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
class Proxy
# @private
SpecificMessage = Struct.new(:object, :message, :args) do
def ==(expectation)
expectation.orig_object == object && expectation.matches?(message, *args)
File proxy.rb
has 340 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
module RSpec
module Mocks
# @private
class Proxy
# @private
Class MethodDouble
has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
class MethodDouble
# @private
attr_reader :method_name, :object, :expectations, :stubs, :method_stasher
# @private
Class Recorder
has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
class Recorder
# @private
attr_reader :message_chains, :stubs, :klass
def initialize(klass)
Method message_received
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def message_received(message, *args, &block)
record_message_received message, *args, &block
expectation = find_matching_expectation(message, *args)
stub = find_matching_method_stub(message, *args)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class HaveReceived
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
class HaveReceived
include Matcher
COUNT_CONSTRAINTS = %w[exactly at_least at_most times time once twice thrice]
ARGS_CONSTRAINTS = %w[with]
File error_generator.rb
has 262 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
RSpec::Support.require_rspec_support "object_formatter"
module RSpec
module Mocks
# Raised when a message expectation is not satisfied.
Method enable_should
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def self.enable_should(syntax_host=default_should_syntax_host)
@warn_about_should = false if syntax_host == default_should_syntax_host
return if should_enabled?(syntax_host)
syntax_host.class_exec do
Method replay_received_message_on
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def replay_received_message_on(expectation, &block)
expected_method_name = expectation.message
meth_double = method_double_for(expected_method_name)
if meth_double.expectations.any?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method verify_constants_to_transfer!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def verify_constants_to_transfer!
return [] unless should_transfer_nested_constants?
{ @original_value => "the original value", @mutated_value => "the stubbed value" }.each do |value, description|
next if value.respond_to?(:constants)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method enable_expect
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def self.enable_expect(syntax_host=::RSpec::Mocks::ExampleMethods)
return if expect_enabled?(syntax_host)
syntax_host.class_exec do
def receive(method_name, &block)
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def call(*_args_to_ignore, &block)
return if @args_to_yield.empty? && @eval_context.nil?
@error_generator.raise_missing_block_error @args_to_yield unless block
value = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method original_method_handle_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def original_method_handle_for(message)
unbound_method = superclass_proxy &&
superclass_proxy.original_unbound_method_handle_from_ancestor_for(message.to_sym)
return super unless unbound_method
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method raise_expectation_error
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def raise_expectation_error(message, expected_received_count, argument_list_matcher,
actual_received_count, expectation_count_type, args,
backtrace_line=nil, source_id=nil)
Method initialize
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def initialize(error_generator, expectation_ordering, expected_from, method_double,
type=:expectation, opts={}, &implementation_block)
Method find_best_matching_expectation_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def find_best_matching_expectation_for(method_name)
first_match = nil
method_double_for(method_name).expectations.each do |expectation|
next unless yield expectation
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method invoke_incrementing_actual_calls_by
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def invoke_incrementing_actual_calls_by(increment, allowed_to_fail, parent_stub, *args, &block)
args.unshift(orig_object) if yield_receiver_to_implementation_block?
if negative? || (allowed_to_fail && (@exactly || @at_most) && (@actual_received_count == @expected_received_count))
# args are the args we actually received, @argument_list_matcher is the
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setup_simple_method_double
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def setup_simple_method_double(method_name, response, collection, error_generator=nil, backtrace_line=nil)
Method invoke_incrementing_actual_calls_by
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def invoke_incrementing_actual_calls_by(increment, allowed_to_fail, parent_stub, *args, &block)
Method add_stub
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def add_stub(error_generator, expectation_ordering, expected_from, opts={}, &implementation)
Method add_expectation
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def add_expectation(error_generator, expectation_ordering, expected_from, opts, &implementation)
Method describe_expectation
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def describe_expectation(verb, message, expected_received_count, _actual_received_count, args)
Method for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def self.for(object_module_or_name, allow_direct_object_refs=false)
case object_module_or_name
when Module
if anonymous_module?(object_module_or_name)
DirectObjectReference.new(object_module_or_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method raise_unimplemented_error
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def raise_unimplemented_error(doubled_module, method_name, object)
message = case object
when InstanceVerifyingDouble
"the %s class does not implement the instance method: %s".dup <<
if ObjectMethodReference.for(doubled_module, method_name).implemented?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_for_unexpected_arguments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def check_for_unexpected_arguments(expectation)
@messages_received_mutex.synchronize do
return if @messages_received.empty?
return if @messages_received.any? { |method_name, args, _| expectation.matches?(method_name, *args) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method method_missing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def method_missing(message, *args, &block)
proxy = __mock_proxy
proxy.record_message_received(message, *args, &block)
if proxy.null_object?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method usable_rspec_prepended_module
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def usable_rspec_prepended_module
@proxy.prepended_modules_of_singleton_class.each do |mod|
# If we have one of our modules prepended before one of the user's
# modules that defines the method, use that, since our module's
# definition will take precedence.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method default_should_syntax_host
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def self.default_should_syntax_host
# JRuby 1.7.4 introduces a regression whereby `defined?(::BasicObject) => nil`
# yet `BasicObject` still exists and patching onto ::Object breaks things
# e.g. SimpleDelegator expectations won't work
#
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method observe!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def observe!(method_name)
allow_no_prepended_module_definition_of(method_name)
if RSpec::Mocks.configuration.verify_partial_doubles? && !Mocks.configuration.temporarily_suppress_partial_double_verification
unless public_protected_or_private_method_defined?(method_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setup_chain
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def setup_chain
if chain.length > 1
if (matching_stub = find_matching_stub)
chain.shift
chain_on(matching_stub.invoke(nil), *chain, &@block)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method and_return
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
def and_return(first_value, *values)
raise_already_invoked_error_if_necessary(__method__)
if negative?
raise "`and_return` is not supported with negative message expectations"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"