Showing 24 of 24 total issues
Method inverse_delimiter has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def inverse_delimiter(*deprecated, with_spacing: deprecated.first)
if with_spacing
hash_rocket? ? SPACED_COLON : SPACED_HASH_ROCKET
else
hash_rocket? ? COLON : HASH_ROCKET- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method def_modifier has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def def_modifier(node = self)
arg = node.children[2]
return unless node.send_type? && node.receiver.nil? && arg.is_a?(::AST::Node)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parent_module_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parent_module_name
# what class or module is this method/constant/etc definition in?
# returns nil if answer cannot be determined
ancestors = each_ancestor(:class, :module, :sclass, :casgn, :block)
result = ancestors.filter_map do |ancestor|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method enforce_same_captures has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enforce_same_captures(enum)
return to_enum __method__, enum unless block_given?
captures_before = captures_after = nil
enum.each do |node|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"