Showing 91 of 97 total issues
File validator.rb
has 508 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'open-uri'
require 'pathname'
require 'bigdecimal'
require 'digest/sha1'
require 'date'
Class Validator
has 47 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Validator
@@schemas = {}
@@cache_schemas = true
@@default_opts = {
list: false,
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(current_schema, data, fragments, processor, validator, options = {})
return unless data.is_a?(Hash)
schema = current_schema.schema
schema['properties'].each do |property, property_schema|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(current_schema, data, fragments, processor, validator, options = {})
# Timestamp in restricted ISO-8601 YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ with optional decimal fraction of the second
if data.is_a?(String)
error_message = "The property '#{build_fragment(fragments)}' must be a date/time in the ISO-8601 format of YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ or YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.ssZ"
if (m = REGEXP.match(data))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(current_schema, data, fragments, processor, validator, options = {})
union = true
if options[:disallow]
types = current_schema.schema['disallow']
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_schemas
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_schemas(parent_schema)
schema = parent_schema.schema
# Build ref schemas if they exist
if schema['$ref']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize_schema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_schema(schema, default_validator)
if schema.is_a?(String)
begin
# Build a fake URI for this
schema_uri = JSON::Util::URI.parse(fake_uuid(schema))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(current_schema, data, fragments, processor, validator, options = {})
errors = Hash.new { |hsh, k| hsh[k] = [] }
validation_error_count = 0
one_of = current_schema.schema['oneOf']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_data(data)
if @options[:parse_data]
if @options[:json]
data = self.class.parse(data)
elsif @options[:uri]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(s)
if defined?(MultiJson)
begin
MultiJson.respond_to?(:adapter) ? MultiJson.load(s) : MultiJson.decode(s)
rescue MultiJson::ParseError => e
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(current_schema, data, fragments, processor, validator, options = {})
if data.is_a?(String)
error_message = "The property '#{build_fragment(fragments)}' must be a time in the format of hh:mm:ss"
if (m = REGEXP.match(data))
validation_error(processor, error_message, fragments, current_schema, self, options[:record_errors]) and return if m[1].to_i > 23
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create clock = nil, time = nil, mac_addr = nil
c = t = m = nil
Dir.chdir Dir.tmpdir do
unless FileTest.exist? STATE_FILE then
# Generate a pseudo MAC address because we have no pure-ruby way
Method build_schemas
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_schemas(parent_schema)
schema = parent_schema.schema
# Build ref schemas if they exist
if schema['$ref']
Method validate
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(current_schema, data, fragments, processor, validator, options = {})
union = true
if options[:disallow]
types = current_schema.schema['disallow']
else
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(schema_data, opts = {})
@options = @@default_opts.clone.merge(opts)
@errors = []
configured_validator = self.class.validator_for_name(@options[:version])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_referenced_uri_and_schema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_referenced_uri_and_schema(s, current_schema, validator)
uri, schema = nil, nil
temp_uri = JSON::Util::URI.normalize_ref(s['$ref'], current_schema.uri)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
super
@attributes = {
'type' => JSON::Schema::TypeV4Attribute,
'allOf' => JSON::Schema::AllOfAttribute,
Method validate
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.validate(current_schema, data, fragments, processor, validator, options = {})
return unless data.is_a?(Hash)
schema = current_schema.schema
schema['properties'].each do |property, property_schema|
Method initialize
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
super
@attributes = {
'type' => JSON::Schema::TypeV4Attribute,
'allOf' => JSON::Schema::AllOfAttribute,
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create clock = nil, time = nil, mac_addr = nil
c = t = m = nil
Dir.chdir Dir.tmpdir do
unless FileTest.exist? STATE_FILE then
# Generate a pseudo MAC address because we have no pure-ruby way
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"