Showing 388 of 406 total issues
Method initialize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(top_level, file_name, content, options, stats)
Method load_method
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_method store, cache, klass, type, name
Method render_template
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_template template_file, out_file = nil # :yield: io
io_output = out_file && !@dry_run && @file_output
erb_klass = io_output ? RDoc::ERBIO : ERB
template = template_for template_file, true, erb_klass
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method documented?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def documented?
return true if super
return false unless @is_alias_for
case @is_alias_for
when String then
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_class_specification
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_class_specification
tk = peek_tk
if tk.nil?
return ''
elsif :on_kw == tk[:kind] && 'self' == tk[:text]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method is_alias_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def is_alias_for # :nodoc:
case @is_alias_for
when RDoc::MethodAttr then
@is_alias_for
when Array then
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method generate_class_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_class_files
setup
template_file = @template_dir + 'class.rhtml'
template_file = @template_dir + 'classpage.rhtml' unless
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method report_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def report_attributes cm
return if cm.attributes.empty?
report = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method <=>
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def <=>(other)
return unless other.respond_to?(:singleton) &&
other.respond_to?(:name)
[ @singleton ? 0 : 1, name] <=>
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method gather_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def gather_files files
files = [@options.root.to_s] if files.empty?
file_list = normalized_file_list files, true, @options.exclude
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_date
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_date(date)
case date
when /\A\s*(\d+)-(\d+)-(\d+)(?:[ T](\d+):(\d+):(\d+) *([-+]\d\d):?(\d\d))?\b/
Time.new($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, ("#{$7}:#{$8}" if $7))
when /\A\s*\w{3}, +(\d+) (\w{3}) (\d+) (\d+):(\d+):(\d+) *(?:([-+]\d\d):?(\d\d))\b/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method each
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.each system = true, site = true, home = true, gems = :latest, *extra_dirs # :yields: directory, type
return enum_for __method__, system, site, home, gems, *extra_dirs unless
block_given?
extra_dirs.each do |dir|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_symbol_in_arg
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_symbol_in_arg
tk = get_tk
if :on_symbol == tk[:kind] then
tk[:text].sub(/^:/, '')
elsif :on_tstring == tk[:kind] then
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_comment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_comment container, tk, comment
return parse_comment_tomdoc container, tk, comment if @markup == 'tomdoc'
column = tk[:char_no]
line_no = comment.line.nil? ? tk[:line_no] : comment.line
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method constant_path_string
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def constant_path_string(node)
case node
when Prism::ConstantReadNode
node.name.to_s
when Prism::ConstantPathNode
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method skip_tkspace_comment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def skip_tkspace_comment(skip_nl = true)
loop do
skip_nl ? skip_tkspace : skip_tkspace_without_nl
next_tk = peek_tk
return if next_tk.nil? || (:on_comment != next_tk[:kind] and :on_embdoc != next_tk[:kind])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_rescue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_rescue
skip_tkspace_without_nl
while tk = get_tk
case tk[:kind]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_aliases
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_aliases
@content.scan(/rb_define_alias\s*\(
\s*(\w+),
\s*"(.+?)",
\s*"(.+?)"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_attr_comment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_attr_comment var_name, attr_name, read = nil, write = nil
attr_name = Regexp.escape attr_name
rw = if read and write then
/\s*#{read}\s*,\s*#{write}\s*/xm
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_class
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_class(raw_name, name, base_name = nil)
unless @classes[raw_name]
if raw_name =~ /^rb_m/
container = @top_level.add_module RDoc::NormalModule, name
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"