Showing 388 of 406 total issues
Method remove_nodoc_children
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_nodoc_children
prefix = self.full_name + '::'
modules_hash.each_key do |name|
full_name = prefix + name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method internal_add_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def internal_add_method(container, meth, line_no:, visibility:, singleton:, params:, calls_super:, block_params:, tokens:) # :nodoc:
meth.name ||= meth.call_seq[/\A[^()\s]+/] if meth.call_seq
meth.name ||= 'unknown'
meth.store = @store
meth.line = line_no
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_method_name_regular
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_method_name_regular container, name_t # :nodoc:
if :on_op == name_t[:kind] && (%w{* & [] []= <<}.include?(name_t[:text])) then
name_t[:text]
else
unless [:on_kw, :on_const, :on_ident].include?(name_t[:kind]) then
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method save_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def save_method klass, method
full_name = klass.full_name
FileUtils.mkdir_p class_path(full_name) unless @dry_run
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method generate_table_of_contents
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_table_of_contents
setup
template_file = @template_dir + 'table_of_contents.rhtml'
return unless template_file.exist?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method root_search
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def root_search req, res
search_index = []
info = []
installed_docs.map do |name, href, exists, type, path|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_visibility
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_visibility(container, single, tk)
vis_type, vis, singleton = get_visibility_information tk, single
skip_tkspace_comment false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_visibility
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_visibility container, vis_type, vis, singleton # :nodoc:
new_methods = []
case vis_type
when 'module_function' then
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_extend_or_include
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_extend_or_include klass, container, comment # :nodoc:
loop do
skip_tkspace_comment
name = get_included_module_with_optional_parens
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_regexp_tk
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def get_regexp_tk(tk)
string = tk[:text]
state = nil
loop do
inner_str_tk = get_squashed_tk
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_attr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_attr(var_name, attr_name, read, write)
rw = ''
rw += 'R' if TRUE_VALUES.include?(read)
rw += 'W' if TRUE_VALUES.include?(write)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method resolve_constant_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resolve_constant_path(constant_path)
owner_name, path = constant_path.split('::', 2)
return constant_path if owner_name.empty? # ::Foo, ::Foo::Bar
mod = nil
@module_nesting.reverse_each do |nesting|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method save_page
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def save_page page
return unless page.text?
path = page_file page.full_name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_symbol_tk
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private def get_symbol_tk(tk)
is_symbol = true
symbol_tk = Token.new(tk.line_no, tk.char_no, :on_symbol)
if ":'" == tk[:text] or ':"' == tk[:text] or tk[:text].start_with?('%s')
tk1 = get_string_tk(tk)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_file absolute_name, relative_name: absolute_name, parser: nil
unless top_level = @files_hash[relative_name] then
top_level = RDoc::TopLevel.new absolute_name, relative_name
top_level.parser = parser if parser
top_level.store = self
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method continue_entry_body
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def continue_entry_body entry_body, continuation
return unless last = entry_body.last
if last =~ /\)\s*\z/ and continuation =~ /\A\(/ then
last.sub!(/\)\s*\z/, ',')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method classes_and_includes_and_extends_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def classes_and_includes_and_extends_for name
klasses = []
extends = []
includes = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_comment_tomdoc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_comment_tomdoc(container, comment, line_no, start_line)
return unless signature = RDoc::TomDoc.signature(comment)
name, = signature.split %r%[ \(]%, 2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method display_page
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def display_page name
store_name, page_name = name.split ':', 2
store = @stores.find { |s| s.source == store_name }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convert_attrs_matching_word_pairs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_attrs_matching_word_pairs(str, attrs, exclusive)
# first do matching ones
tags = @matching_word_pairs.select { |start, bitmap|
exclusive == exclusive?(bitmap)
}.keys
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"