Showing 3 of 5 total issues
Class Result
has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
class Solid::Result
attr_accessor :unknown, :event_logs
attr_reader :source, :data, :type_checker, :terminal
Method type_and_value!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def type_and_value!(data)
type, value = data.type, data.value
return value if IgnoredTypes.include?(type)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def new
list, around_and_then, around_event_logs = listeners[:list], nil, nil
instances = list.map do |item|
instance = item.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"