Showing 9 of 9 total issues
Method find_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_type(data)
first_element = rank.zero? ? data : data.flatten[0]
type, self.type_num, self.data_size = case first_element
when Integer
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_attributes
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_attributes(cdesc, status, name, value)
cAttrName = CString(name)
if value.is_a?(Hash)
value, type = value.first
end
Method find_type
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_type(data)
first_element = rank.zero? ? data : data.flatten[0]
type, self.type_num, self.data_size = case first_element
when Integer
Method shape_of
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.shape_of(value)
if value.is_a?(Array)
if value.any? { |ele| ele.is_a?(Array) }
dim = value.group_by { |ele| ele.is_a?(Array) && shape_of(ele) }.keys
[value.size] + dim.first if dim.size == 1 && dim.first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(name = nil, type = nil, attribute = nil, input = nil, inputlist = nil)
self.name = name
self.type = type
self.attr = if attribute.nil?
{}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_attributes(cdesc, status, name, value)
cAttrName = CString(name)
if value.is_a?(Hash)
value, type = value.first
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(name = nil, type = nil, attribute = nil, input = nil, inputlist = nil)
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(value, type = nil)
self.shape = self.class.shape_of(value)
self.rank = shape.size
self.element_type = type.nil? ? find_type(value) : set_type(type)
if rank > 1 && type_num == Tensorflow::TF_STRING
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method AddOperation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def AddOperation(opspec)
opspec.name = opspec.type if opspec.name.nil?
opspec.name = opspec.type if opspec.name == ''
cname = CString(opspec.name)
ctype = CString(opspec.type)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"