Showing 6 of 8 total issues
Class Connection
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Connection < EM::Connection
STALL_TIMEOUT = 90 unless defined?(STALL_TIMEOUT)
STALL_TIMER = 10 unless defined?(STALL_TIMER)
Class Request
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Request
attr_reader :proxy, :options
def initialize(options = {})
Method to_s
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_s
content = query
data = []
data << "#{request_method} #{request_uri} HTTP/1.1"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ssl_verify_peer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ssl_verify_peer(cert_string)
cert = nil
begin
cert = OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new(cert_string)
rescue OpenSSL::X509::CertificateError
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method params
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def params
flat = {}
@options[:params].each do |param, val|
next if val.to_s.empty? || (val.respond_to?(:empty?) && val.empty?)
val = val.join(",") if val.respond_to?(:join)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method concat
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def concat(data)
@timestamp = Time.now
return unless data && data.size > 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"