Showing 400 of 533 total issues
Method method_missing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def method_missing(name, *args, &block)
if args.empty?
list = xpath("#{XPATH_PREFIX}#{name.to_s.sub(/^_/, "")}")
elsif args.first.is_a?(Hash)
hash = args.first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createClosingNode
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createClosingNode(Ruby ruby, String uri, String localName, String qName, int depth, Stack<String> langStack,
Stack<String> xmlBaseStack)
Method coalesceTextNodes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected static void
coalesceTextNodes(ThreadContext context,
IRubyObject anchorNode,
AdoptScheme scheme)
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method call
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
call(String methodName,
IRubyObject arg0,
IRubyObject arg1,
IRubyObject arg2,
IRubyObject arg3,
Method getNodeValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String
getNodeValue(int nodeHandle)
{
// The _type(nodeHandle) call was taking the lion's share of our
// time, and was wrong anyway since it wasn't converting handle to
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setAttribute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void
setAttribute(ThreadContext context, String key, String val)
{
Element element = (Element) node;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (NName.equals("id")) {
if (isRealVisible) {
// treat xml:id like any other attribute
// (emit it, but don't inherit it)
result.add(attribute);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (rewriteTable == null) { rewriteTable = new HashMap<CharSequence, CharSequence>(8, 1); }
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (attr.isId() && id.equals(attr.getValue()) && se != knownElement) {
//log.debug("Multiple elements with the same 'Id' attribute value!");
return false;
}
Method findNamespaceHref
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String
findNamespaceHref(ThreadContext context, String prefix)
{
XmlNode currentNode = this;
final XmlDocument doc = document(context.runtime);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method resolveResource
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public LSInput
resolveResource(String type,
String namespaceURI,
String publicId,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getContentImpl
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public CharSequence
getContentImpl()
{
if (!node.hasChildNodes() && node.getNodeValue() == null &&
(node.getNodeType() == Node.TEXT_NODE || node.getNodeType() == Node.CDATA_SECTION_NODE)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (childElement.hasAttributeNS(namespaceNs,
currentAttr.getLocalName())) {
continue;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!m_processedFirstElement
&& "xmlns:xml".equals(attrs.item(i).getNodeName())) {
m_processedFirstElement = true;
}
Method parse_with
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod
public IRubyObject
parse_with(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject handlerRuby)
{
final Ruby runtime = context.getRuntime();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method native_write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod
public IRubyObject
native_write(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject chunk,
IRubyObject isLast)
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getStrFromNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String
getStrFromNode(Node xpathnode)
{
if (xpathnode.getNodeType() == Node.TEXT_NODE) {
// we iterate over all siblings of the context node because eventually,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!namespaceNs.equals(currentAttr.getNamespaceURI())) {
continue;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (int k = 0; k < nodeMap.getLength(); k++) {
if ("charset".equalsIgnoreCase((item = nodeMap.item(k)).getNodeName())) {
return item.getNodeValue();
}
}
Method getAttrsOfAncestors
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void
getAttrsOfAncestors(Node parent, List<Attr> namespaces, List<Attr> attributes)
{
if (parent == null) { return; }
NamedNodeMap attrs = parent.getAttributes();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"