Showing 400 of 537 total issues
Method startElement
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void
startElement(String uri, String localName, String qName, Attributes attrs) throws SAXException
{
final Ruby runtime = this.runtime;
Method handleAttributesSubtree
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected Iterator<Attr>
handleAttributesSubtree(Element element, NameSpaceSymbTable ns)
throws CanonicalizationException
{
Method getDTMHandleFromNode
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public /* synchronized */ int
getDTMHandleFromNode(org.w3c.dom.Node node)
{
//if (node == null) // "node must be non-null for getDTMHandleFromNode!");
Method getXPathContext
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private XPathContext
getXPathContext(final NokogiriXPathFunctionResolver fnResolver)
{
Node doc = context.getNode().getOwnerDocument();
if (doc == null) { doc = context.getNode(); }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parseAttributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void
parseAttributes(XMLAttributes attrs, Stack<String> langStack, Stack<String> xmlBaseStack)
{
if (attrs.getLength() > 0) { attributeList = new ReaderAttributeList(); }
String u, n, v;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getNamespacesWithPropagated
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void
getNamespacesWithPropagated(List<Attr> namespaces, Attr attr)
{
boolean newNamespace = true;
Iterator<Attr[]> iter = c14nNamespaceStack.iterator();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method op_and
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod(name = "&")
public IRubyObject
op_and(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject nodeSet)
{
IRubyObject[] otherNodes = getNodes(context, nodeSet);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getInternalSubset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public IRubyObject
getInternalSubset(ThreadContext context)
{
IRubyObject dtd = (IRubyObject) node.getUserData(DTD_INTERNAL_SUBSET);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_html(*args)
if Nokogiri.jruby?
options = args.first.is_a?(Hash) ? args.shift : {}
options[:save_with] ||= Node::SaveOptions::DEFAULT_HTML
args.insert(0, options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method iconv_configure_flags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def iconv_configure_flags
# give --with-iconv-dir and --with-opt-dir first priority
["iconv", "opt"].each do |target|
config = preserving_globals { dir_config(target) }
next unless config.any? && try_link_iconv("--with-#{target}-* flags") { dir_config(target) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method xpath_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xpath_for(
selector, options = nil,
prefix: options&.delete(:prefix),
visitor: options&.delete(:visitor),
ns: options&.delete(:ns),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method enter
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public boolean
enter(Element element)
{
if (canonical) {
c14nNodeList.add(element);
Method leave
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void
leave(Node node)
{
if (node instanceof Document) {
leave((Document)node);
Method isEqualNode
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public boolean
isEqualNode(Node arg)
{
if (arg == this) {
return true;
Method getXmlnsAttr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
void
getXmlnsAttr(Collection<Attr> col)
{
int size = levels.size() - 1;
if (cur == null) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_sibling
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_sibling(next_or_previous, node_or_tags)
raise("Cannot add sibling to a node with no parent") unless parent
impl = next_or_previous == :next ? :add_next_sibling_node : :add_previous_sibling_node
iter = next_or_previous == :next ? :reverse_each : :each
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method method_missing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def method_missing(method, *args, &block)
opts = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
case method.to_s
when /^(.*)!$/
@node["id"] = Regexp.last_match(1)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write_to
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_to(io, *options)
return super unless document.is_a?(HTML5::Document)
options = options.first.is_a?(Hash) ? options.shift : {}
encoding = options[:encoding] || options[0]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method protectAgainstWrappingAttack
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean
protectAgainstWrappingAttack(Node startNode, String value)
{
Node startParent = startNode.getParentNode();
Node processedNode;
Method outputAttrToWriter
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected static final void
outputAttrToWriter(
final String name, final String value,
final OutputStream writer, final Map<String, byte[]> cache
) throws IOException