File jquery.ui.widget.js
has 403 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery UI Widget 1.10.3
* http://jqueryui.com
*
* Copyright 2013 jQuery Foundation and other contributors
Function widget
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.widget = function( name, base, prototype ) {
var fullName, existingConstructor, constructor, basePrototype,
// proxiedPrototype allows the provided prototype to remain unmodified
// so that it can be used as a mixin for multiple widgets (#8876)
proxiedPrototype = {},
Function bridge
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.widget.bridge = function( name, object ) {
var fullName = object.prototype.widgetFullName || name;
$.fn[ name ] = function( options ) {
var isMethodCall = typeof options === "string",
args = slice.call( arguments, 1 ),
Function _on
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_on: function( suppressDisabledCheck, element, handlers ) {
var delegateElement,
instance = this;
// no suppressDisabledCheck flag, shuffle arguments
Function name
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn[ name ] = function( options ) {
var isMethodCall = typeof options === "string",
args = slice.call( arguments, 1 ),
returnValue = this;
Function option
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
option: function( key, value ) {
var options = key,
parts,
curOption,
i;
Function _createWidget
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_createWidget: function( options, element ) {
element = $( element || this.defaultElement || this )[ 0 ];
this.element = $( element );
this.uuid = uuid++;
this.eventNamespace = "." + this.widgetName + this.uuid;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
_hoverable: function( element ) {
this.hoverable = this.hoverable.add( element );
this._on( element, {
mouseenter: function( event ) {
$( event.currentTarget ).addClass( "ui-state-hover" );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
_focusable: function( element ) {
this.focusable = this.focusable.add( element );
this._on( element, {
focusin: function( event ) {
$( event.currentTarget ).addClass( "ui-state-focus" );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76